Meta-analysis of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of imaging techniques in aiding and confirming the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies that evaluated the effectiveness of 3 different imaging techniques in aiding the diagnosis of CRPS type I. A systematic search in bibliographical databases resulted in 24 studies with 1,916 participants. RESULTS: To determine the effectiveness of each imaging technique, we determined the average specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value and then statistically compared them using the analysis of variance statistical test, which indicated that compared with magnetic resonance imaging and plain film radiography, triple-phase bone scan had a significantly better sensitivity and negative predictive values. However, there appeared to be no statistical significance between imaging techniques when we evaluated specificity and positive predictive value using the analysis of variance test. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta-analysis support the use of triple-phase bone scan in ruling out CRPS type I, owing to its greater sensitivity and higher negative predictive value than both magnetic resonance imaging and plain film radiography. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic I.

Sea urchin injuries to the hand: a case report and review of the literature.

Sea urchin injuries to the hand are uncommon. A variety of home remedies can be found on the internet and other sources for dealing with this problem in the acute setting. Many long term complications such as granulomas, arthritis, and tenosynovitis can result from a neglected sea urchin injury. We report an unusual case of a patient with a remote sea urchin injury who presented with ulnar digital nerve paresthesias. A traumatic neuroma was found on surgical exploration. We review the literature on injuries to the hand caused by sea urchins and their management. Management of sea urchin injuries to the hand with retained spines requires surgical debridement in order to prevent significant long term complications including stiffness, tenosynovitis, granulomas, and arthritis.

Symptomatic phrenic nerve palsy after supraclavicular block in an obese man.

Regional anesthesia has an expanding role in upper extremity surgery. Brachial plexus blocks offer several advantages including providing effective analgesia, reducing narcotic requirements, and facilitating ambulatory care surgery. Despite the popularity of nerve blocks, the surgeon must not forget the complications associated with regional anesthesia. This article describes a case of symptomatic phrenic nerve palsy after supraclavicular brachial plexus block in an obese man. A 46-year-old obese man underwent a left-sided supraclavicular block in preparation for decompression of Guyon's canal for ulnar mononeuropathy at the wrist. The patient experienced acute-onset dyspnea, chest discomfort, and anxiety, and physical examination demonstrated reduced breath sounds in the left hemithorax. Chest radiographs documented elevation of the left hemidiaphragm consistent with an iatrogenic phrenic nerve palsy. The patient was admitted for 23-hour observation and underwent an uncomplicated ulnar nerve decompression under Bier block anesthesia 1 week later. No long-term sequelae have been identified; however, there was a delay in surgical care, admission to the hospital, and transient pulmonary symptoms. We attribute this complication to significant abdominal obesity causing compromised pulmonary reserve and poor tolerance of transient hemidiaphragmatic paresis. In recent studies, waist circumference and abdominal height were inversely related to pulmonary function. We suspect that the incidence of symptomatic phrenic nerve palsy associated with brachial plexus blocks will increase as the prevalence of obesity increases in this country.

Variations of the flexor digitorum superficialis as determined by an expanded clinical examination.

PURPOSE: Current examination techniques do not detect the wide clinical variability of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS). Modification of current examination techniques may be necessary to detect anomalies and lead to more accurate diagnosis. We examined 500 subjects using an expansion of current techniques to elicit the range of variations in FDS function discernable on clinical examination. METHODS: FDS function was evaluated by asking subjects to flex the finger of interest while all other fingers were held fully extended at the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints. Isolated flexion at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint indicated independent FDS function. Obligatory flexion at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint indicated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) activity. Because FDS activity could not be evaluated if concurrent FDP activity was present, these fingers were designated as having FDP substitution. Difficulty isolating PIP joint flexion suggested connections to adjacent FDS or FDP, prompting the examiner to serially release adjacent fingers while observing for improvement in PIP or DIP range of motion. RESULTS: Independent FDS function was most consistently present in the ring and middle fingers, less so in the index finger, and least in the small finger. Variations included FDP substitution or connections to flexor tendons in 1 or 2 adjacent fingers with or without evidence of FDP substitution. Absent FDS function cannot be presumed in any subject based solely on clinical examination of a single digit. CONCLUSIONS: Current examination techniques are inadequate to discern among the multiple variations of FDS function. An expanded examination technique is recommended for accurate diagnosis of FDS function following flexor tendon injury.

Factitious disorders.

Factitious disorders reside under the broad umbrella of dysfunctional syndromes. This article is meant specifically to focus on common patterns of upper extremity factitious illness. It is intended to emphasize recognition, differential diagnosis, and problems related to misdiagnosis. It is not devoted to treatment, which is a separate issue.

Complex regional pain syndrome type I in the upper extremity.

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) remains a challenging condition for physicians to treat since the earliest descriptions dating back to the Civil War. It has been most commonly reported after traumatic injury or fracture; however, many other causes have been documented. This article focuses on CRPS type 1 as it pertains to the upper extremity. In general, patients who have complex regional pain syndrome suffer from pain, sensory changes, edema, sweating, and temperature disturbance in the afflicted extremity. Chronic changes can involve the skin, nails, and bone. The pathophysiology of this condition remains unclear and is probably multifactorial, involving persistent inflammation, the sympathetic nervous system, the central nervous system and external stimuli. Treatment should be based on a multidisciplinary experienced team approach that is focused on functional restoration. Future research will provide insight into pathophysiology and optimal treatment regimens.

Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes and the workers' compensation environment: an update.

Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes are terms used to describe a constellation of complaints ranging from generalized aches to specific tender trigger points often accompanied by fatigue, depression, and sleep disturbances. In the past 5 years, research has been directed primarily at determining the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes and the treatment of patients' comorbidities to alleviate their symptomatology. Controversy exists as to whether fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes represent a specific pathology or are merely terms to describe clinical conditions that provide patients with the reassurance that their symptoms are real and help clinicians with therapeutic direction. In the occupational health setting, this uncertainty can lead to significant difficulty in determining short- and long-term disability and assigning culpability to an individual's work environment.