[Long term aspirin in stable coronary disease with an indication for anticoagulation: is it reasonable?]. / Aspirine à vie et maladie coronarienne stable avec indication à une anticoagulation: est-ce bien raisonnable?

In patients with both stable coronary disease and atrial fibrillation, a baseline treatment of aspirin and an oral anticoagulant is often prescribed due to the proven benefits of each therapy on cardiovascular and thromboembolic events and mortality. However, recent cohort studies in this population have shown that adding aspirin to an oral anticoagulant is not associated with a reduction in recurrence of coronary or thromboembolic events, but significantly increases the bleeding risk. In these patients, in particular when their bleeding risk is high, aspirin withdrawal may be considered.

Toscana virus meningitis case in Switzerland: an example of the ezVIR bioinformatics pipeline utility for the identification of emerging viruses.

Toscana virus (TOSV) represents a frequent cause of viral meningitis in the Mediterranean Basin that remains neglected in neighbouring countries. We report a documented TOSV meningitis case in a traveller returning from Tuscany to Switzerland. While routine serological and PCR assays could not discriminate between TOSV and Sandfly fever Naples virus infection, a high-throughput sequencing performed directly on the cerebrospinal fluid specimen and analysed with the ezVIR pipeline provided an unequivocal viral diagnostic. TOSV could be unequivocally considered as the aetiological agent, proving the potential of ezVIR to improve standard diagnostics in cases of infection with uncommon or emerging viruses.

[Can antiplatelet therapy be continued in upper gastrointestinal bleeding?]. / Peut-on poursuivre un traitement antiagrégant en cas d'hémorragie digestive haute?

During a gastro-intestinal bleeding, treatment options regarding antiplatelet agents depend on the indication. In primary prevention, treatment can reasonably be stopped regarding the low expected benefit. In secondary prevention, experts recommend resuming treatment after a five-day interruption. In patients with a coronary stent, the decision is made on a case by case basis and requires close multidisciplinary collaboration between internists, cardiologists and gastroenterologists.

[Enteral nutrition: nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy?]. / Nutrition entérale: sonde nasogastrique ou gastrostomie percutanée endoscopique?

When enteral nutrition is indicated to prevent or to treat a patient with denutrition choosing between a nasogastric tube (NGT) and a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is not always an easy decision. In neurological patients with swallowing disturbances or in patients with head and neck tumors, PEG is associated with lower rates of feeding tube dislodgement, while NGT has lower rates or morbidity. A meta-analysis showed that the interruption of nutrition is less frequent with PEG but there is no difference in terms of mortality and aspiration pneumonia between PEG and NGT. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism recommends PEG when enteral nutrition is expected to last more than 3 weeks.

Clinical supervisors' perceived needs for teaching communication skills in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Lack of faculty training is often cited as the main obstacle to post-graduate teaching in communication skills. AIMS: To explore clinical supervisors' needs and perceptions regarding their role as communication skills trainers. METHODS: Four focus group discussions were conducted with clinical supervisors from two in-patient and one out-patient medical services from the Geneva University Hospitals. Focus groups were audio taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed in a thematic way using Maxqda software for qualitative data analysis. RESULTS: Clinical supervisors said that they frequently addressed communication issues with residents but tended to intervene as rescuers, clinicians or coaches rather than as formal instructors. They felt their own training did not prepare them to teach communication skills. Other barriers to teach communication skills include lack of time, competing demands, lack of interest and experience on the part of residents, and lack of institutional priority given to communication issues. Respondents expressed a desire for experiential and reflective training in a work-based setting and emphasised the need for a non-judgmental learning atmosphere. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that organisational priorities, culture and climate strongly influence the degree to which clinical supervisors may feel comfortable to teach communication skills to residents. Attention must be given to these contextual factors in the development of an effective communication skills teaching program for clinical supervisors.

Targeted education improves the very low recognition of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis management by general internists.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures in older persons are strong predictors of subsequent fracture risk but remain largely under-recognized. To evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the recognition of vertebral fractures and the prescription of anti-osteoporosis treatment among general internists, we conducted a prospective study in a service of general internal medicine of a large university teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. During a 3.5-month observation period (phase 1), all lateral spinal or chest radiographs performed on consecutive inpatients over 60 years were reviewed by two independent investigators, and vertebral fractures were graded according to their severity. METHODS: Results were compared with radiology reports and general internists' discharge summaries. During the following 2-month intervention period (phase 2), internists were actively educated about vertebral fracture identification by means of lectures, posters and flyers. Radiologists did not receive this educational strategy and served as controls. RESULTS: Among 292 consecutive patients (54% men; range: 60-97 years) included in phase 1, 85 (29%) were identified by investigators as having at least one vertebral fracture; radiologists detected 29 (34%), and internists detected 19 (22%). During the intervention phase, 58 (34%) of 172 patients were identified with vertebral fractures by investigators; radiologists detected 13 patients (22%) whereas among internists the detection rate almost doubled (25/58 patients, 43%; p=0.008 compared to phase 1). The percentage of patients with vertebral fracture who benefitted from an osteoporosis medical management increased from 11% (phase 1) to 40% (phase 2, p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the large under-recognition of vertebral fractures, irrespective of their severity, and demonstrate that a simple educational strategy can significantly improve their detection on routine radiographs and, consequently, improve osteoporosis management.

Relationship between hospital length of stay and quality of care in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between hospital length of stay (LOS) and quality of care in patients admitted for congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: This observational study was conducted in the medical wards of the Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. A random sample of 371 patients was drawn from the 1084 patients discharged alive with a principal diagnosis of CHF between January 1997 and December 1998. Explicit criteria grouped into three scores were used to assess the quality of processes of care: admission work-up (admission score); evaluation and treatment during the stay (treatment score); and readiness for discharge (discharge score). The association between LOS and quality of care was analysed using linear regression with adjustment for clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The mean proportion of criteria met were 80% for the admission score, 66% for the treatment score, and 76% for the discharge score. Mean (SD) LOS was 13.2 (8.8) days. The admission score was not associated with LOS, but the treatment score increased by 0.5% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.7; p < 0.001) with each additional day in hospital and the discharge score increased by 2.5% (95% CI 1.6 to 3.3; p < 0.001) per day from admission to day 10 but remained unchanged thereafter. Adjustment for potential confounders did not substantially modify these relationships. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF there is a significant association between LOS and the quality of the treatment provided, as well as with readiness for discharge. Appropriate reorganisation of processes of care should accompany attempts at reducing LOS to avoid detrimental effects on quality of care.

Role of echocardiography in the evaluation of syncope: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of echocardiography in the stepwise evaluation of syncope. DESIGN: A prospective observational study with an 18 month follow up. SETTING: University teaching hospital providing primary and tertiary care. SUBJECTS: 650 consecutive patients with syncope and clinical suspicion of an obstructive valvar lesion, or with syncope not explained by history, physical examination, or a 12 lead ECG, who underwent bidimensional Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The causes of syncope were assigned using published diagnostic criteria. Echocardiography was considered diagnostic when confirming a suspected diagnosis, or when revealing occult cardiac disease explaining the syncope. RESULTS: A systolic murmur was identified in 61 of the 650 patients (9%). Severe aortic stenosis was suspected in 20 of these and was confirmed by echocardiography in eight. Follow up excluded further cases of aortic stenosis. In patients with unexplained syncope (n = 155), routine echocardiography showed no abnormalities that established the cause of the syncope. Echocardiography was normal or non-relevant in all patients with a negative cardiac history and a normal ECG (n = 67). In patients with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG (n = 88), echocardiography showed systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%) in 24 (27%) and minor non-relevant findings in the remaining 64. Arrhythmias were diagnosed in 12 of the 24 patients with systolic dysfunction (50%), and in 12 of the 64 remaining patients (19%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography was most useful for assessing the severity of the underlying cardiac disease and for risk stratification in patients with unexplained syncope but with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG.

Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield of a standardized sequential evaluation of patients with syncope in a primary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with syncope as a chief complaint were enrolled. Their evaluation included initial and routine clinical examination, including carotid sinus massage, as well as electrocardiography and basic laboratory testing. Targeted tests, such as echocardiography, were used when a specific entity was suspected clinically. Other cardiovascular tests (24-hour Holter monitoring, ambulatory loop recorder ECG, upright tilt test, and signal-averaged electrocardiography) were performed in patients with unexplained syncope after the initial steps. Electrophysiologic studies were performed in selected patients only as clinically appropriate. Follow-up information on recurrence and mortality were obtained every 6 months for as long as 18 months for 94% (n = 611) of the patients. RESULTS: After the initial clinical evaluation, a suspected cause of syncope was found in 69% (n = 446) of the 650 patients, including neurocardiogenic syncope (n = 234, 36%), orthostatic hypotension (n = 156, 24%), arrhythmia (n = 24, 4%), and other diseases (n = 32, 5%). Of the 67 patients who underwent targeted tests, suspected diagnoses were confirmed in 49 (73%) patients: aortic stenosis (n = 8, 1%), pulmonary embolism (n = 8, 1%), seizures/stroke (n = 30, 5%), and other diseases (n = 3). Extensive cardiovascular workups, which were performed in 122 of the 155 patients in whom syncope remained unexplained after clinical assessment, provided a suspected cause of syncope in only 30 (25%) patients, including arrhythmias in 18 (60%), all of whom had abnormal baseline ECGs. The 18-month mortality was 9% (n = 55, including 8 patients with sudden death); syncope recurred in 15% (n = 95) of the patients. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield of a standardized clinical evaluation of syncope was 76%, greater than reported previously in unselected patients. Electrocardiogram-based risk stratification was useful in guiding the use of specialized cardiovascular tests.

Detecting acute thoracic aortic dissection in the emergency department: time constraints and choice of the optimal diagnostic test.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic strategies for the emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute thoracic aortic dissection and to measure the effect of delays related to the availability of these tests on the selection of the most appropriate one. METHODS: We carried out a decision analysis representing the risks of performing one or two sequential tests, the tests' accuracy, the risks and benefits of treatment, and the time-dependent mortality rate in untreated patients with dissection (1%/hour). Data were drawn from a Medline search. Our subjects were patients who presented to the emergency department with chest pain in whom acute thoracic aortic dissection was suspected. For different clinical probabilities of aortic dissection, we compared the risks and benefits of testing using the following procedures (alone and in combinations): aortography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and both transesophageal (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We then measured the effect of delays in these tests on the selection of the appropriate procedure. The outcome studied was 30-day survival. RESULTS: We determined that the "threshold" clinical probability of aortic dissection above which the benefits of testing outweigh its risks is low. It ranges from 2% with the most reliable procedure (MRI) to 9% with the least (TTE). At low probability of dissection (< 15%), the accuracy of all tests except TTE is sufficient to rule out dissection. Delays have negligible effect on these results. When the likelihood of dissection is higher, the preferred option is to order a second diagnostic test if the results of the first are negative. The threshold probabilities above which to order a second test range from 15% (CT, then aortography) to 35% (MRI, then aortography). Excessive delays may affect the selection of tests when the likelihood of dissection is high (eg, 50%). Thus, although it is less accurate, a CT scan obtained within 2 hours or a TEE obtained within 6 hours of presentation to the ED yields a higher survival rate than an MRI obtained within 9 hours. Similarly, the benefits of ordering a second test, if the result of the first are negative, outweigh the risks only if the delay in obtaining the test does not exceed 10 hours. CONCLUSION: All patients in whom aortic dissection is suspected, even if the index of suspicion is very low, should undergo one of the available diagnostic procedures (except TTE). A patient with a moderate to high probability of disease should undergo a second investigation if the findings of the first are negative. When the probability of dissection is high, the physician must consider delays in obtaining specific diagnostic tests and order those that will be the most quickly available.