Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ex-Situ and In-Situ Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies.

PURPOSE: To gain insight into safety and efficacy of in situ and ex-situ fenestration techniques for total endovascular arch repair. The term ex-situ fenestration is referring to physician-modified stent-graft technique where fenestration is performed on a back table. METHODS: Electronic search was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analyses) guidelines from 2000 to 2020. The main outcomes measured were 30-day mortality, stroke, aortic-related mortality, and reintervention rates. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were eligible: 7 ex-situ fenestration (189 patients) and 8 in-situ fenestration (149 patients). In ex-situ group, dissection was the main pathology treated and proximal sealing zones were Z0 or 1 in 53.5% of patients. In in-situ group, dissection and aneurysm were equally represented in around 40% of cases and proximal sealing zones were Z0 or 1 in 46.5% of patients. Cumulative 30-day all-cause mortality was similar in both groups: 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%-8.2%) and 3.8% (95% CI: 1.6%-8.9%), respectively, in ex-situ and in-situ groups and stroke rate of 2.8% (95% CI: 1.1%-7%) and 5.3% (95% CI: 2.6%-10.5%). After a 11.1 ± 2.6 months mean follow-up for ex-situ and 16.7 ± 2.3 months for in-situ group, there were 5.2 and 1.4 reinterventions per 100 patients-years, respectively, for ex-situ and in situ groups. Aortic-related mortality rates of, respectively, 3.2% (95% CI: 1.3%-7.4%) and 2.6% (95% CI: 0.9%-7.3%) were noted in ex-situ and in situ groups. CONCLUSION: The reported data show favorable short-term results of both ex-situ and in-situ fenestration techniques with low mortality and strokes rates. However, durability is still questionable given the lack of long-term data. Both options may have their place in arch repair beyond the spectrum of emergent and urgent cases, on condition that results stand the test of time. CLINICAL IMPACT: In situ and ex-situ fenestration techniques have been initially developed to overcome emergency or as a bail out techniques however giving the promessing favorable short term results indications of these techniques may be extended to elective patients ineligible to customized stent-grafts and possibly in the futur to more elective cases as an option for total endovascular arch repair.

Diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating mid-course responders to chemotherapy for long-bone osteosarcoma compared to the histologic response: an update.

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been described to correlate with tumoural necrosis in response to preoperative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of DWI in evaluating the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the mid-course treatment of long-bone osteosarcoma and in predicting survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-centre study over a continuous period of 11 years. Consecutive patients younger than 20 years treated with a neoadjuvant regimen for peripheral conventional osteosarcoma were eligible for inclusion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI was performed at diagnosis, and mid- and end-course chemotherapy with mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) calculated at each time point. A percentage less than or equal to 10% of the viable residual tissue at the histological analysis of the surgical specimen was defined as a good responder to chemotherapy. Survival comparisons were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- and multivariate analyses with ADC change were performed by Cox modelling. This is an expansion and update of our previous work. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients between the ages of 4.8 and 19.6 years were included, of whom 14 were good responders. At mid-course chemotherapy, good responders had significantly higher mean ADC values (P=0.046) and a higher increase in ADC (P=0.015) than poor responders. The ADC change from diagnosis to mid-course MRI did not appear to be a prognosticator of survival and did not impact survival rates of both groups. CONCLUSION: DWI at mid-course preoperative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma should be considered to evaluate the degree of histological necrosis and to predict survival. The anticipation of a response to neoadjuvant treatment by DWI may have potential implications on preoperative management.

Technical feasibility and correlations between shear-wave elastography and histology in kidney fibrosis in children.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound elastography has been suggested for assessing organ fibrosis. OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of shear-wave elastography in children with kidney disease and the correlation between elasticity and kidney fibrosis in order to reduce the indications for kidney biopsy and its complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four operators measured kidney elasticity in children with kidney diseases or transplants, all of whom also had a renal biopsy. We assessed the feasibility and the intraobserver variability of the elasticity measurements for each probe used and each kidney explored. Then we tested the correlation between elasticity measurements and the presence of fibrosis. RESULTS: Overall, we analyzed 95 children and adolescents, 31 of whom had renal transplant. Measurements with the convex probe were possible in 100% of cases. Linear probe analysis was only possible for 20% of native kidneys and 50% of transplants. Intraobserver variabilities ranged from moderate to high, depending on the probe and kidney studied. Elasticity was higher with the linear probe than with the convex probe (P<0.001 for left kidney and P=0.03 for right kidney). Measurements did not differ from one kidney to another in the same child. Elasticity and fibrosis were both higher in transplant patients (P=0.02 with convex probe; P=0.01 with linear probe; P=0.04 overall). There was no correlation between elasticity and fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Of the devices used in this work, kidney elastography was more accurately analyzed with a convex probe. Our study did not identify any correlation between elasticity and kidney fibrosis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular versus open repair for common femoral artery atherosclerosis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Encouraging recent reports on endovascular treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease has rendered the question regarding the place of this technique evermore pertinent and legitimizes the performance of randomized trials. The present comprehensive review focused on the early and midterm outcomes to help assess the benefit/risk balance of endovascular vs open repair for CFA treatment. METHODS: Embase and Medline searches were conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses) standards to identify studies from 2000 to 2018 reporting on endovascular repair (ER), open surgery (OS), and comparisons of both techniques for CFA atherosclerosis treatment. The outcomes measured were 30-day mortality, morbidity, reintervention rates, midterm patency, late reintervention, and restenosis rates. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were eligible: 14 OS (1920 patients), 12 ER (1900 patients), and 2 comparative randomized trials (197 patients). The meta-analysis of the comparative studies revealed no differences in 30-day mortality or reintervention rates but improved 30-day morbidity after ER. At 1 year, the primary patency rates did not differ between ER and OS, nor did the late reintervention rate. In the noncomparative studies, with a mean follow-up period of 23.8 months for ER and 66 months for OS, the restenosis rate was 14.4% and 4.7%, respectively. The reported stent fracture rate was 3.6%. In the ER cohort, the overall primary patency at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.9%, 77.8%, and 75.1%, respectively. For the OS cohort, the overall primary patency rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 93.4%, 91.4%, and 90.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite expectations, our analysis of the reported data suggests that the perioperative mortality is not in favor of ER; however, the perioperative morbidity showed an advantage for ER compared with OS. Also, although comparable in the first year, the long-term primary patency rate was much greater after OS. At present, the place of ER for CFA treatment still requires further definition. Additional clarification of the indications and more research are both required to determine the optimal endovascular technology and femoral bifurcation reconstruction with stenting.

Mechanical characterisation of human ascending aorta dissection.

Mechanical characteristics of both the healthy ascending aorta and acute type A aortic dissection were investigated using in vitro biaxial tensile tests, in vivo measurements via transoesophageal echocardiography and histological characterisations. This combination of analysis at tissular, structural and microstructural levels highlighted the following: (i) a linear mechanical response for the dissected intimomedial flap and, conversely, nonlinear behaviour for both healthy and dissected ascending aorta; all showed anisotropy; (ii) a stiffer mechanical response in the longitudinal than in the circumferential direction for the healthy ascending aorta, consistent with the histological quantification of collagen and elastin fibre density; (iii) a link between dissection and ascending aorta stiffening, as revealed by biaxial tensile tests. This result was corroborated by in vivo measurements with stiffness index, ß, and Peterson modulus, Ep, higher for patients with dissection than for control patients. It was consistent with histological analysis on dissected samples showing elastin fibre dislocations, reduced elastin density and increased collagen density. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report biaxial tensile tests on the dissected intimomedial flap and in vivo stiffness measurements of acute type A dissection in humans.

Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Chronic Type B Dissection Treatment: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The respective place of endovascular repair (ER) versus open surgery (OS) in thoracic dissecting aneurysm treatment remains debatable. This comprehensive review seeks to compare the outcomes of ER versus OS in chronic type B aortic dissection treatment. METHODS: Embase and Medline searches (2000 to 2017) were performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Outcomes data extracted comprised (1) early mortality and major complications: stroke, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), dialysis, and respiratory complications; and (2) late survival and reinterventions. Reintervention causes were divided into proximal, adjacent, and distal. Comparative studies allowed comparative meta-analysis. Noncomparative studies were analyzed in pooled proportion meta-analyses for each group. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were identified after exclusions, of which 4 were comparative. Comparative meta-analysis demonstrated lower early mortality for ER (odds ratio [OR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 15.4), stroke (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.02 to 18.35), SCI (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 0.97 to 11.25), and respiratory complications (OR, 6.88; 95% CI,1.52 to 31.02), but higher reintervention rate (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.69). Midterm survival was similar (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.42 to 3.32). Noncomparative studies demonstrated that most reinterventions were related to the aortic segment distal to primary intervention in both groups (OS 73%, ER 59%). Reintervention procedures were mainly surgical for OS (85%), mainly endovascular for ER (75%). Rupture rates were 1.2% (OS) and 3% (ER). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is associated with significant early benefits, but this is not sustained at midterm. Reintervention is more frequent, but the OS is not exempt from reintervention or late rupture. Both techniques have their place, but patient selection is key.

Effect of Immunosuppression on Target Blood Immune Cells Within 1 Year After Lung Transplantation: Influence of Age on T Lymphocytes.

BACKGROUND Lymphocytes are targeted by immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation and they influence allograft outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets (PBLS) determined by flow cytometry during the first year post-transplant from patients who underwent a first lung transplantation in a French University Hospital between December 2011 and July 2013 were retrospectively analyzed according to recipient characteristics and allograft outcome. RESULTS Fifty-seven recipients were enrolled and 890 PBLS were collected. T lymphocytes and NK cells were rapidly decreased, below normal range, from the first postoperative days. B cells decreased more gradually, remaining within normal range, with the lowest level reached after day 100. In multivariate analysis, greater T lymphopenia was found in older recipients (-414 [-709 to -119] cells/µL, p=0.007). According to the outcome, multivariate analysis evidenced lower levels of lymphocytes when bacterial and viral infection occurred (-177 [-310 to -44] cells/µL, p=0.009 and (-601 [-984 to -218] cells/µL, p=0.002, respectively), higher CD8+ T lymphocytes with BOS (+324 [+94 to +553] cells/µL, p=0.006), and higher leukocytes with restrictive allograft syndrome (+3770 [+418 to +7122] cells/µL, p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS Aging is associated in our cohort with more severe T lymphopenia after induction therapy for lung transplantation. The analysis of leukocytes and PBLS is associated with specific profile according to the allograft outcome.

Aortic Anatomy and Complications of the Proximal Sealing Zone after Endovascular Treatment of the Thoracic Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Technical and clinical success of thoracic aortic endovascular procedures relies mainly on the choice of the proximal sealing zone (PSZ). The latter can be affected by multiple complications, all of them having a potential gravity and a direct link with the quality of the PSZ. The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors of PSZ complications occurrence. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2015, all the patients treated by a thoracic stent graft in zones 2, 3, or 4 were retrospectively reviewed, with analysis of the preoperative and postoperative angio-computed tomography. Proximal sealing zone complications are type Ia endoleaks, bird beak ≥20 mm, malposition ≥11 mm, migration ≥10 mm, and retrograde dissection. Three types of potential risk factors were analyzed: (1) related to the patients (age, gender, pathology, urgency, hybrid surgery); (2) related to the stent graft (bare or covered proximal stent, degree of oversizing, number of stents, generation); (3) related to the morphology (radius of curvature, diameter, degree of conicity, calcifications and thrombus of the neck, depth of the arch, angulation of the proximal sealing zone, and tortuosity index of the arch and the thoracic aorta. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (mean age: 54 years, 17-93 years) were treated for traumatic aortic rupture (n = 27, 35.5%), aortic dissection (n = 26, 34%), aneurysm (n = 15, 20%), and other diseases (floating thrombus, aortoesophageal fistula) (n = 8, 10.5%). A hybrid surgery was carried out in 18 patients (24%). Primary technical success was 93.5% (n = 71). With a mean follow-up of 29 months, 30 PSZ complications were observed in 21 patients (28%): type Ia endoleaks (n = 3, 4%), bird beak (n = 7, 9%), malposition (n = 3, 4%), migration (n = 1, 1.5%), retrograde dissection (n = 1, 1.5%), or several complications (n = 6, 7.8%). Among the morphological factors, 2 parameters were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications: tortuosity index (group without PSZ complications 1.62 ± 0.2 vs. group with PSZ complications 1.72 ± 0.2, P = 0.042), and the diameter of the proximal neck (group without PSZ complications 25.7 ± 5 vs. group with PSZ complications 31 ± 6.0, P = 0.001). Neither the demographic factors nor those related to the stent graft presented a statistically significant relation with the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: This work clearly highlights the relation between PSZ complications, independently of their type, and the local and global aortic morphology. A wide proximal neck, > 34 mm, and an important aortic tortuosity, > 1.8, are situations at risk.

One-Year Outcome for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Results From the French National Register.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the status of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) management in France and to assess predictors of adverse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed the first-year outcome of all cases of CDH reported to the French National Register in 2011. RESULTS: A total of 158 cases were included. Of these, 83% (131) were prenatally diagnosed, with a mortality rate of 39% (44 of 112) for live born infants with a known outcome at hospital discharge. Mortality increased to 47% (60 of 128) including those with termination of pregnancy and fetal loss. This contrasts with the 7% (2 of 27) mortality rate of the patients diagnosed postnatally (P = .002). Mortality worsened with 1 prenatal marker of CDH severity (OR 3.38 [1.30-8.83] P = .013) and worsened further with 2 markers (OR 20.64 [5.29-80.62] P < .001). Classic postnatal risk factors of mortality such as side of hernia (nonleft P = .001), prematurity (P < .001), low birth weight (P = .002), and size of the defect (P < .001) were confirmed. Of the 141 live births (114 prenatal and 27 postnatal diagnosis) with known outcomes, 93 (67%) survived to hospital discharge, 68 (60%) with a prenatal diagnosis and 25 (93%) with a postnatal diagnosis. The median time to hospital discharge was 34 days (IQR, 19.25-62). Of these survivors, 71 (76%) were followed up for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in management of CDH, mortality was high and associated with prenatal risk factors. Postnatally, severe persistent pulmonary hypertension was difficult to predict and presented persistent challenges in management.

Outcomes analysis of stent-graft repair for thoracic aorta emergencies.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify patient, pathology and procedure-related factors affecting perioperative and mid-term mortality of thoracic aorta emergencies. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2014, patients treated emergently with thoracic stent-graft were retrospectively reviewed. Variables analyzed were: age, renal insufficiency, shock, cardiac arrest, transfer status, pathology, debranching procedures, operation duration, vascular access and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE). Seventy-four patients (54.5±22 years) were treated for traumatic rupture (N.=31), aneurysm (TAA) (N.=16), acute aortic syndrome (N.=18), aorto-esophageal fistula (N.=2), floating thrombus (N.=7). Thirty-four patients (46%) were in shock, including 3 suffering preoperative cardiac arrest. Proximal landing zones were: zone 0 (N.=4), zone 1 (N.=4), zone 2 (N.=37), zone 3 (N.=21) and zone 4 (N.=8). Debranching procedures were performed in 16 cases (22%). RESULTS: Perioperative all-cause- mortality was 18.9% (N.=14). Univariable analysis identified age, renal insufficiency, shock, transfer status, cardiac arrest, debranching procedures in zones 0 or 4 and EuroSCORE as predictors of death (P=0.002, P=0.001, P=0.002, P=0.05, P=0.006, P=0.028, P<0.001 respectively). Multivariable analysis pinpointed shock and renal insufficiency as independent risk factors. Over a mean 41 months follow-up, survival was 72% at both 1 and 3 years and was impacted by pathology and debranching procedures. Aortic re-intervention rate was 12% (N.=9), significantly higher in TAA group (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhagic shock remains highly lethal for endovascular repair. Hybrid procedures in zones 0 or 4 should be avoided to improve short and mid-term outcomes. TAA groups require close surveillance to detect late events.

Examination of factors in type I endoleak development after thoracic endovascular repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of operative indication, anatomy, and stent graft on type I endoleak occurrence after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients admitted for thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2007 and 2013. All computed tomography angiography imaging was analyzed for the presence of endoleak and measurement of diameters and lengths. Variables studied included underlying disease, emergency, achieved aortic neck length, difference between proximal and distal neck diameters, landing zone 2, and stent graft characteristics (diameter, number, type of device, oversizing degree, and covered aorta length). RESULTS: The study population involved 84 patients (mean age, 56 years; range, 17-94 years) who were treated for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (n = 29; 34.5%), traumatic aortic rupture (n = 27; 32%), type B aortic dissection (n = 19; 22.5%), intramural hematoma (n = 2; 2%), penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 5; 6%), and aortoesophageal fistula (n = 2; 2%). Of these, 60 patients (71.5%) were treated emergently and 24 (28.5%) electively. Primary type I endoleak was noted in eight patients (9.5%), of which two resolved spontaneously. After a mean follow-up of 32 months (range, 3-76 months), secondary type I endoleak was detected in four patients (4.5%). All of them occurred after emergent TAA treatment. Comparison between emergent and elective groups revealed no significant differences in neck length (19.5 mm vs 26.5 mm; P = .197), oversizing degree (11.1% vs 10.9%; P = .811), or endoleak rates (13.3% vs 8.3%; P = .518). Hemorrhagic shock was not predictive of endoleak (P = .483). Cox regression analysis of the different anatomic and stent graft-related factors revealed short proximal landing zone as the unique independent predictor of type I endoleak (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.99; P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Endoleak risk seems not to be increased by an emergency setting. However, the relatively high rate of late endoleak observed after emergent TAA repair advocates for close follow-up, contrary to traumatic aortic rupture. Furthermore, regardless of the pathologic process, a longer proximal landing zone is likely to guarantee early and late success.

Association between structural and functional corticospinal involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis assessed by diffusion tensor MRI and triple stimulation technique.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the functional and structural integrity of the corticospinal tract (CST) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and the triple stimulation technique (TST) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Fourteen patients with ALS, 13 healthy controls (HCs), and 6 patients with lower motor neuron (LMN) syndrome underwent DTI and TST. RESULTS: The mean diffusivity was higher in ALS patients than HCs (P < 0.01). The TST ratio was lower in ALS patients compared with HCs (P < 0.001) and in LMN patients compared with HCs (P < 0.05). The increase in the mean diffusivity was correlated with the decrease in the TST ratio (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant correlations exist between the DTI and TST results, indicating both structural and functional involvement of the CST in patients with ALS.