Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, follow-up study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of conventional surgery for lumbar disc herniation over an extended period of time and to examine factors that might correlate with unsatisfactory results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the short-term results of lumbar discectomy are excellent when there is a proper patient selection, the reported success rates in the long-term follow-up studies vary, and few factors have been implicated for an unsatisfactory outcome. METHODS: One hundred-nine patients with surgically documented herniated lumbar disc were analyzed, retrospectively, by an independent observer. Long-term follow-up (mean 12.2 years) was done by a mailed, self-report questionnaire that included items about pain relief in the back and leg, satisfaction with the results, need for analgesics, level of activity, working capacity, and reoperations. Subjective disability was measured by the Oswestry questionnaire. Radiographic review was carried out in 66% of patients. End results were assessed using the modified Stauffer-Coventry's evaluating criteria. Several variables were examined to assess their influence to the outcome. RESULTS: The late results were satisfactory in 64% of patients. The mean Oswestry disability score was 18.9. Of the 101 patients who had primary procedures, 28% still complained of significant back or leg pain. Sixty-five percent of patients were very satisfied with their results, 29% satisfied, and 6% dissatisfied. The reoperation rate was 7.3% (8 patients), about one-third of which was due to recurrent disc herniation. Sociodemographic factors predisposing to unsatisfactory outcome, including female gender, low vocational education, and jobs requiring significant physical strenuousness. Disc space narrowing was common at the level of discectomy, but was without prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of standard lumbar discectomy are not very satisfying. More than one-third of the patients had unsatisfactory results and more than one quarter complained of significant residual pain. Heavy manual work, particularly agricultural work, and low educational level were negative predictors of a good outcome. These indicators should be used preoperatively to identify patients who are at high risk for an unfavorable long-term result.

Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, the results of treating unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar injuries with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation were investigated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pain and work status of the patients, to evaluate neurologic status, and to assess the efficacy of instrumentation in the short term. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Short-segment pedicle screw construct is the method of choice for reduction and stabilization of unstable thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Many investigators have recently reported a high rate of instrument failure. In this study, the use of segmental transpedicular fixation two levels above the kyphosis decreased instrument failure and sagittal collapse. METHODS: Thirty patients, who had unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar spinal injuries, underwent application from a posterior approach of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation two levels above and one below at the thoracolumbar junction and short segment fixation in the lumbar area. Radiologic parameters were evaluated before and after surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow up was 31 months (range, 25-49) months. There were statistically significant differences between the pre- and postoperative values in all radiologic parameters. Neurologic status improved in 70% of the patients, with a mean Frankel grade of 1.3 grades. CONCLUSIONS: Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation provided spinal stability in unstable injuries, forming a rigid construct and restoring physiologic thoracolumbar and lumbar postural contours because of its highly corrective effect in the sagittal profile with no loss of correction.