The introduction of wide-angle 270° laparoscopy through a novel laparoscopic camera system.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has enjoyed improvements over the last three decades primarily in achieving high definition, but the 70° field of view (FOV) remains unchanged. Complications related to events that take place out of the FOV continue to be reported. Additional problems leading to poor visualization are fogging and smoke accumulation. A novel laparoscopic system (SurroundScope, 270Surgical) was developed and dramatically expands the FOV from the 70° to 270° by adding side cameras at the distal tip of the laparoscope, while LED illumination eliminates fogging and improves smoke effects. This study describes the initial clinical experience with SurroundScope and its potential advantages over traditional laparoscopy. METHODS: SurroundScope was studied at Bnai Zion Medical Center in Israel and the Minnesota Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery in America. 27 laparoscopic surgeries were performed, and at the end of each procedure, evaluations were completed by all surgeons and camera holders. RESULTS: All 27 cases were completed successfully without adverse events. No injuries occurred as a result of surgical tool manipulation outside of the central frame while 133 potentially adverse events were identified on side frames. There was no fogging across the 27 cases. The impact of smoke was negligible in all cases, as laparoscope removal or venting was never necessary. Surgeon respondents indicated that tools could be followed from the port to the site of surgery without camera manipulation. Most surgeons strongly agreed that the potential to identify bleeding was improved. Camera holders strongly agreed that the ergonomics were improved and that they moved the camera less than with a standard laparoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results demonstrate numerous advantages for SurroundScope as compared to traditional laparoscopy. The important benefits of expanded FOV, complete lack of fogging, and negligible smoke may improve patient safety, reduce adverse events and the duration of surgery. Further investigation to quantify these benefits is recommended.

Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing forceps biopsy sampling with wide-area transepithelial sampling brush for detecting intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia during routine upper endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intestinal metaplasia (IM) in the esophagus is a potentially premalignant mucosal change. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of IM detection during upper endoscopy by forceps biopsy sampling (FB) versus wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS) brush. METHODS: Patients presenting for upper endoscopy for foregut symptoms or surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) at 9 centers in the United States were randomized to either FB or WATS. RESULTS: Of 1002 patients, FB was done in 505 and WATS in 497. The overall frequency of finding IM was 21% and was similar with FB (19.6%) and WATS (22.7%, P = .2). Low-grade dysplasia was found in 8 patients. No patient had high-grade dysplasia. There was no difference in detection of dysplasia between FB and WATS. In patients with no history of IM, WATS found significantly more IM compared with FB when a columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) was present (32.4% with WATS vs 15.2% with FB, P = .004). In 184 patients with known BE, FB and WATS found IM with similar frequency (38.5% FB vs 41.9% WATS, P = .6) with no difference in short- or long-segment BE. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, FB and WATS detected a similar frequency of IM and dysplasia. WATS was twice as likely as FB to find IM in patients without a history of BE who had CLE on endoscopy. In patients with known BE, WATS and FB showed IM and dysplasia with similar frequency. These findings suggest that WATS can be used instead of FB with similar or improved efficacy at detecting IM and dysplasia. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03859557.).

Primary Peritoneal Mesothelioma Resulting in Small Bowel Obstruction: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare malignancy that affects the serosal surfaces of the peritoneum. The peritoneum is the second most common site of mesothelium affected following the pleura. The aggressive nature and vague presentation pose many obstacles in not only diagnosis but also the treatment of patients with this disease. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 76-year-old woman who presented with small bowel obstruction secondary to carcinomatosis secondary to primary peritoneal mesothelioma. The patient had multiple risk factors with asbestos exposure and prior therapeutic radiation. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss the highly varied and elusive presentation of peritoneal mesothelioma. Cumulative asbestos exposure, either directly or indirectly, remains the leading cause of mesothelioma. However, there are other non-asbestos etiologies. Small bowel obstruction often is a late-presenting symptom of widespread tumor burden. A concise review of the current diagnostic and surgical treatment of primary peritoneal mesothelioma demonstrates that early diagnosis and implementation remains vital.