Ease of Application of Various Neuromuscular Devices for Routine Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Subjective evaluations to confirm recovery from neuromuscular blockade with a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) is inadequate. Quantitative monitors are the only reliable method to confirm adequate recovery of neuromuscular function. Unfortunately, many clinicians are unfamiliar with such devices and there is concern that the introduction of objective monitoring would be exceedingly laborious and could cause workflow delays. This study investigates how long it takes experienced nurse anesthetists to apply various neuromuscular devices as well as their perception regarding the ease of application. METHODS: Twenty nurse anesthetists were consented and participated in an educational session that familiarized them with 3 devices: SunStim Plus PNS (SunMed, Grand Rapids, MI), the acceleromyography-based IntelliVue NMT device (Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and electromyography-based TetraGraph device (Senzime B.V., Uppsala, Sweden). Participants were timed while placing each monitor on patients in a real-world setting. For the quantitative devices (IntelliVue NMT and TetraGraph), participants were also timed when obtaining calibrated baseline train-of-four (TOF) ratios. Friedman test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the difference in time to connect different devices. Participants were surveyed about how easy they found it to utilize these devices. RESULTS: After adjusting for multiple comparison, time to connect was significantly less for PNS (median, 29; range, 16-58 seconds) compared to either the TetraGraph device (median, 62.8; range, 32-101 seconds; P < .001) or the IntelliVue NMT device (median, 46; range: 28-90 seconds; P < .001). The difference in time to connect between the TetraGraph device and the IntelliVue NMT device was not statistically significant (P = .053), but it took significantly less time to calibrate the TetraGraph device than the IntelliVue NMT device (median difference, -16; range, -88 to 49 seconds; P = .002). The participants found applying either the IntelliVue NMT device (P = .042) or the TetraGraph device (P = .048) more difficult than applying a PNS while finding it easier to calibrate the TetraGraph device versus the IntelliVue NMT device (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It takes 19 seconds longer to apply a quantitative neuromuscular monitor (the IntelliVue NMT device) than a PNS. While this difference reached significance, this relatively minimal additional time represents an inappropriate barrier to the application of quantitative monitors. Regardless of which quantitative monitor was utilized, these nurse anesthetists found the application and utilization of such devices relatively straightforward.

Improving satisfaction with postoperative pain management for patients with persistent pain: a preoperative pain medicine consultation intervention.

PURPOSE: Preoperative pain medicine consultations with opioid-tolerant patients allow for an accurate medication history, patient involvement in the postoperative plan, and realistic goal setting. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase attendance at preoperative pain consultations, thereby increasing patient satisfaction. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews identified patients who had a preoperative pain consultation ordered from May through July 2016. Patient interviews determined reasons for not attending appointments, involvement in goal setting, engagement in pain management planning, and satisfaction with postoperative pain management. RESULTS: Retrospective chart reviews and interviews were conducted after the intervention (May-July 2017). Scheduling changes increased attendance at preoperative pain consultations by 14 percentage points (50% vs 64%). Those who attended consultations were more involved in goal setting and decisions and were more satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pain consultations with opioid-tolerant patients can increase satisfaction through realistic goal setting and involvement in the pain management plan.

Pediatric Perioperative Nurses and the Ethics of Organ Donation After Cardiac Death.

Pediatric perioperative nurses are experiencing increased opportunities to participate in donations after cardiac death. An increased public awareness regarding transplantation has inspired more people to donate than in previous years. The demand for transplantable organs has led to opportunities that have increased donor candidates including living donors and cardiac death donors. Cardiac death in children is often sudden and unexpected, and is an emotional time not only for the family members but also for the hospital staff members, including perioperative nurses. However, when perioperative nurses adhere to standards and guidelines, they can perform their responsibilities in an ethical and compassionate manner and assist their team in doing so. This article reviews the guiding principles of pediatric organ donation after cardiac death, the phases of the process, and the ethical and moral issues surrounding donation.

Propofol Versus Midazolam/Fentanyl Sedation for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Patient Population.

PURPOSE: Despite current literature, data on the most effective sedation and best patient outcomes are insufficient for providing recovery time recommendations for elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy with sedation. We sought to identify the best sedation practice for shorter recovery times. Therefore, a study was conducted to examine recovery times among patients older than 65 years undergoing elective colonoscopy with intravenous sedation with either propofol or the combination of midazolam/fentanyl. DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive, exploratory design was used. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients older than 65 years undergoing outpatient elective colonoscopy at our institution between January and December 2013. Recovery times were evaluated for those administered intravenous propofol or a combination of midazolam/fentanyl. Patient demographics and sedation medications were obtained from patient records. A modified Aldrete score greater than 8 was required for discharge. Recovery time was defined as the time from procedure completion to a modified Aldrete score greater than 8. FINDINGS: Propofol sedation was associated with longer recovery times compared with sedation with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl (mean: 50 minutes versus 31 minutes, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol sedation was not associated with shorter recovery times. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.

Laryngeal Mask Airway and Valsalva Maneuver During Ophthalmic Surgery: A Case Report.

The use of a supraglottic airway, also called laryngeal mask airway (LMA), is gaining in popularity for delivery of general anesthesia in certain situations and is shown to be safe. Use of infraglottic airways (tracheal tubes) allows for positive pressure ventilation and maneuvers, such as holding continuous positive pressure in the airway to check for pleural and dural leaks. We describe the successful use of the LMA (Teleflex Inc) for general anesthesia, in which continuous positive airway pressure of 15 cm H2O held for 20 seconds allowed the neurosurgeon to identify the site of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and successfully repair the leak. A well-seated LMA can be successfully used to produce continuous positive pressure in the airway not exceeding 20 cm H2O for 20 seconds to facilitate surgical identification of CSF leaks.