Low back pain prevention behaviors and beliefs among the Polish population in a cross-sectional survey.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common problems of public health and creates a burden globally. The aim was to assess the Polish population's back pain prevention behaviors and beliefs and to examine how these health behaviors and beliefs vary across sociodemographic factors and physical activity. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among 208 randomly selected patients of the public general practitioner clinic. The differences in LBP-related beliefs and attitudes were determined due to participants' status of requiring or non-requiring LBP treatment. Results: More than half of the respondents did not engage in behaviors that protect against back pain. Individuals with higher education levels and those who exercised at least once a week were significantly more likely to adopt behaviors to protect their backs. Less than half of the participants reported having a workplace that was adequately prepared to protect against back pain, and only 35.1% of the participants reported receiving instruction while taking up work on how to avoid back pain while working. According to respondents' opinions, preventive actions are necessary to protect against back pain. Inappropriate exercises and stress can be contributors to back pain, with these opinions reported more often by women and participants with higher education levels. Participants who received treatment for LBP showed a significantly higher expression of behaviors to protect against back pain compared to participants who did not require treatment. However, there were no significant differences in participants' beliefs about back pain prevention between the group requiring LBP treatment and the group not requiring LBP treatment. Conclusion: The study provides valuable insights into the association between LBP treatment, back pain prevention behaviors, and beliefs, suggesting potential avenues for future research and intervention development. By addressing workplace ergonomics and promoting a culture of back health, it may be possible to reduce the burden of LBP in Poland.

Outcomes of Patients with Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in I-IV Stage.

Background and Objectives: Large cell neuroendocrine cancer is characterised by poor prognosis. The standard of treatment is still not established. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and combined LCNEC. Materials and Methods: All patients had confirmed pathology stage I-IV disease recorded between period 2002-2018. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox-regression analysis. Results: A total of 132 patients with LCNEC and combined LCNEC were included. Half of them had clinical stage IIIB/C-IV. Patients were treated with radical (n = 67, including surgery alone; resection with neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy, or adjuvant radiotherapy; patients treated with radiochemotherapy alone), palliative (n = 41) or symptomatic (n = 24) intention. Seventeen patients were treated with resection margin R1 or R2. Non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) chemotherapy (platinum-vinorelbine; PN schedule) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) chemotherapy approaches (platinum/carboplatinum-etoposide; PE/KE schedule) were administered in 20 and in 55 patients, respectively. The median (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) OS and PFS were 17 months (9.0-36.2 months) and 7 months (3.0-15.0 months), respectively. Patients treated with negative resection margin, with lower clinical stage, without lymph node metastasis, and with size of primary tumour ≤4 cm showed significantly better OS and PFS. The main risk factors with an adverse effect on survival were advanced CS and positive resection margin. Conclusions: Patients with LCNEC characterized poor prognosis. Independent prognostic factors influencing PFS were initial clinical stage and resection margin R0 vs. R1-2.

Outcomes of Patients with Clinical Stage I-IIIA Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer Treated with Resection.

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. The rationale of the study was to determine the survival of LCNEC patients in I-IIIA clinical stages who underwent resection. A total of 53 LCNEC (89%) and combined LCNEC (11%) patients in stages I-IIIA who underwent surgery with radical intent between 2002-2018 were included in the current study. Overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) were estimated. Uni- and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox-regression model. Patients were treated with surgery alone (51%), surgery with radiochemotherapy (4%), with radiotherapy (2%), with adjuvant chemotherapy (41%), or with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (2%). The median (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) OS and TTR was 52 months (20.1-102.1 months) and 20 months (7.0-75.6 months), respectively. Patients treated in clinical stage I showed better OS than patients in stages II-IIIA (p = 0.008). Patients with R0 resection margin (negative margin, no tumor at the margin) and without lymph node metastasis had significantly better TTR. In the multivariate analysis, age was an independent factor influencing OS. Recurrence within 1 year was noted in more than half cases of LCNEC. R0 resection margin and N0 status (no lymph node metastasis) were factors improving TTR. Age >64 years was observed as a main independent factor influencing OS.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors - from oncology perspective.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) is a form of molecular targeted therapy which is performed by using a small peptide (somatostatin analogue - SSA) that is coupled with a radionuclide beta emitting radiation. PRRT is a nuclear medicine for the systemic treatment of non-resectable, metastasized well/moderately differentiated, neuroendocrine tumours (NET) with overexpression of somatostatin receptor. These types of tumours include gastroenteropancreatic neoplasm (GEP-NENs), e.g. arising from the small bowel (often called carcinoid tumours), the pancreas, duodenum or stomach, but also from the large bowel or the lung and many other tissues (so called diffuse neuroendocrine system). The goal of PRRT is irradiation of tumour cells, via direct binding into specific receptor, somatostatin receptors (SSTR) family, overexpressed on the cell membrane of the primary tumours as well as on the metastasis. Over many years of clinical use of PRRT with 9°Y and current with ¹77Lu DOTA conjugated somatostatin analogues proved to be efficient therapy option for NETs, with tumour responses, base on radiological evaluation. Also, a clinical response with symptoms relief and improvement in quality of life based on standard EORTC questioners is seen. Additional, common NET biomarker reduction and, ultimately, an impact on overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-resectable often progressive NEN can be expected. PRRT with 9°Y or ¹77Lu-labelled peptides is generally well tolerated by most of the patients. The acute side effects (Adverse Events - AEs) are usually mild; most of them are related to the co-administration of amino acids (AA), such as nausea and vomiting. Others are related to the radioisotopes, such as fatigue or the exacerbation of endocrine syndromes, which are very rarely and they occurs, only in patients with functional tumours and large tumours burden. Chronic and permanent damage has an effect on target organs, particularly the kidneys and the bone marrow, which are generally mild. Currently, when ¹77Lu DOTATATE is used, the potential risk to kidney damage is significantly reduced, compared to the previous usage of 9°Y labelled analogues. Up to now, kidney and bone marrow toxicity limits the dose of radioactivity of PRRT.

The utility of blood neuroendocrine gene transcript measurement in the diagnosis of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours and as a tool to evaluate surgical resection and disease progression.

OBJECTIVES: The management of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours (BPNETs) is difficult, since imaging, histology and biomarkers have a limited value in diagnosis, predicting outcome and defining therapeutic efficacy. We evaluated a NET multigene blood test (NETest) to diagnose BPNETs, assess disease status and evaluate surgical resection. METHODS: (i) Diagnostic cohort: BP carcinoids (n = 118)-typical carcinoid, n = 67 and atypical carcinoid, n = 51; other lung NEN (large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung carcinoma, n = 13); adenocarcinoma, (n = 26); squamous cell carcinoma (n = 23); controls (n = 90) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 18). (ii) Surgical cohort, n = 28: BP carcinoids (n = 16: typical carcinoid 12; atypical carcinoid 4); large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, n = 3; lung adenocarcinoma, n = 8 and squamous cell carcinoma, n = 1. Blood sampling was performed presurgery and 30 days post-surgery. Transcript levels measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction were calculated as activity scores (0-100% scale: normal < 14%) and compared with chromogranin A (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; normal <109 ng/ml). RESULTS: NETest was significantly elevated in carcinoids (48.7 ± 27%) versus controls (6 ± 6%, P < 0.001) with metrics: sensitivity 93%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value 92% and negative predictive value 91%. NETest differentiated progressive disease (73 ± 22%) from stable disease (36 ± 19%, P < 0.001) and R0 resections (10 ± 5%, P < 0.001, area under the curve: 0.98). Levels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancers were 18-24% while elevated in small-cell lung carcinoma/large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (59 ± 10%). In BPNETs on postoperative Day 30, NETest decreased by 60% (P < 0.001). Chromogranin A was elevated in only 40% of carcinoids and not altered by surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Blood NET gene levels accurately identified BPNETs (100%) and differentiated these from controls, benign and malignant lung disease. Progressive disease could be identified and surgical resection verified. Chromogranin A had no clinical utility. Monitoring NET transcript levels in blood will facilitate management by detecting residual tumour and identifying progressive disease.