Assessment of Bone Health Awareness and Education in Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastasis in the USA.

Bone metastases are common in advanced breast cancer (BC) patients and increase the risk for skeletal-related events (SREs), which present a significant health and economic burden. Bone targeting agents (BTAs) can improve health-related quality of life by delaying or preventing SREs; nevertheless, a significant portion of eligible BC patients are not receiving this therapy. A bone health education needs assessment survey was conducted to examine cancer-related bone health awareness and to identify opportunities to improve bone health education. Direct-to-patient outreach was used to recruit adult BC patients in the USA self-reporting a diagnosis of bone metastasis within the past 3 years. Of the 200 patients, 59% experienced at least one SRE prior to survey participation (44% radiation to bone, 29% bone fracture, 17% spinal cord compression, 15% surgery to bone), and 83% were currently receiving a BTA. Awareness of general cancer bone health, protection strategies against SREs, and screening tests were low to moderate. Patients currently not receiving a BTA were least knowledgeable about cancer bone health, with only 40% aware of BTAs as a protective strategy, and only 26% were very or extremely satisfied with the information received from healthcare providers. Sixty-two percent of patients wanted to receive information by more than one mode of communication. Notable gaps in bone health education were observed in bone metastatic BC patients at risk for SREs, suggesting the need for earlier and more effective communication and education strategies to promote appropriate BTA use and better health outcomes.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw among patients with cancer treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid: Results of a regulator-mandated cohort postauthorization safety study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is an adverse effect of antiresorptive treatment. This study estimated incidence proportions and incidence rates of ONJ in cancer patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This cohort study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden in 2011-2018 included 3 treatment cohorts: a denosumab inception cohort (DEIC), a zoledronic acid inception cohort (ZAIC), and a denosumab-switch cohort (DESC). The authors estimated 1- to 5-year incidence proportions and incidence rates of ONJ overall, by cancer site (breast, prostate, or other solid tumor), and by country. ONJ diagnoses were confirmed by adjudication. RESULTS: There were 1340 patients in the DEIC, 1352 in the ZAIC, and 408 in the DESC. The median ages of the 3 cohorts were 70, 69, and 70 years, respectively; the proportions of men were 72.6%, 53.8%, and 48.3%, respectively; and the median follow-up was 19.8, 12.9, and 13.3 months, respectively. The 5-year incidence proportions of ONJ were 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%-7.3%) in the DEIC, 1.4% (95% CI, 0.8%-2.3%) in the ZAIC, and 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-10.0%) in the DESC. The corresponding ONJ incidence rates per 100 person-years were 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3-3.7), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and 4.3 (95% CI, 2.8-6.3). Incidence proportions and incidence rates were highest in patients with prostate cancer and in Denmark. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides estimates of the risk of medically confirmed ONJ among patients initiating denosumab or zoledronic acid in routine clinical practice in 3 Scandinavian countries. The results varied by cancer site and by country. LAY SUMMARY: Denosumab and zoledronic acid reduce the risk of bone fractures, pain, and surgery in patients with advanced cancers involving bone. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)-death of a jawbone-is a known side effect of treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid. The authors examined almost 2900 denosumab- or zoledronic acid-treated patients with cancer in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Over the course of 5 years, ONJ developed in 5.7% of the patients whose initial treatment was denosumab, in 1.4% of the patients whose initial treatment was zoledronic acid, and in 6.6% of the patients who switched from zoledronic acid to denosumab.

Assessment of Bone Health Education in US Multiple Myeloma and Solid Tumor Patients at Risk for Skeletal-Related Events.

PURPOSE: Cancer patients with bone metastasis (BM) from solid tumors or multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of painful skeletal-related events (SREs), which can decrease quality of life and increase mortality. Bone targeting agents (BTAs) can help delay or prevent SREs; however, a significant portion of eligible patients are not receiving BTA therapy. This study was conducted to understand patient awareness of cancer-related bone health and to identify opportunities to improve bone health education in cancer patients at risk of SREs. METHODS: The online BonE heAlth eduCatiOn Needs assessment (BEACON) survey included questions about patient demographics, cancer diagnosis and treatments (including BTA usage), and extent and satisfaction with bone health education received. Direct-to-patient outreach was used to recruit patients. Eligible patients were US adults with a diagnosis of self-reported MM or BM from a solid tumor (breast, lung, or prostate cancer) within the past three years. RESULTS: Of 125 patients, 71% were diagnosed with solid tumors with BM and 29% with MM. At least one prior SRE was experienced by 57% of patients (38% radiation to bone, 32% bone fracture, 22% spinal cord compression, and 19% surgery to bone), and 74% were currently receiving BTA therapy. Awareness of cancer bone health, protection strategies, and screening tests was low to moderate; patients were least informed of the impact of lifestyle changes (38%) and specific cancer treatments (≤35%) on bone health. Sixty-two percent of patients were not completely satisfied with the bone health education received. Patients generally wanted more information (58%) and to receive information by more than one mode of communication. CONCLUSION: Notable gaps in bone health education were observed in cancer patients at risk for SREs indicating an important need for improved communication and education strategies to promote better health outcomes.

Navigating metastatic colorectal treatment options in the USA: a survey of patient acceptance of skin toxicities associated with Vectibix.

PURPOSE: To understand the extent to which metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receive education on the prevention and management associated with skin rash following Vectibix treatment. Furthermore, to investigate how this adverse event affects a patient's quality of life (QoL) and influences their treatment decisions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 200 mCRC patients (100 Vectibix users and 100 Vectibix non-users). After excluding respondents who had used cetuximab, 61 Vectibix users and 56 Vectibix non-users remained. RESULTS: Most Vectibix users (79%) experienced a skin rash in response to treatment of which 65% considered the rash moderate, 27% mild, and 8% severe. Vectibix users generally felt they were adequately informed about the rash (83%), with the most common messages received related to sun protection. However, sunscreen was used by only 42% of patients prior to rash and 60% of patients following the appearance of rash. The use of oral antibiotics was low prior to rash (21%) and following rash (46%). Among patients experiencing a rash within the past week (n=16), 75% reported the rash had a large negative impact on their QoL based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index. CONCLUSION: There was a disconnect between patients feeling they were adequately informed and use of prevention and management strategies such as sun protection. This suggests a gap in patient education and adoption currently exists on management strategies both prior to and following the appearance of rash. Given the negative impact that skin toxicity has on the patient's quality of life, it is essential that patients receive and subsequently utilize all information that can minimize rash severity.

An evaluation of RAS testing among metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the USA.

Background: Data on RAS testing practices prior to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment initiation are lacking in the USA. Materials & methods: Flatiron data were utilized for patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2011 and 2017. Flatiron is a longitudinal, demographically and geographically diverse database representing data from over 1.5 million active US patients treated at 255 community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics. Results: Among 17,387 mCRC patients 69% were RAS tested and 31% were never tested. Timing of RAS testing was as follows: 23% were tested at the time of their initial CRC diagnosis, 60% following mCRC diagnosis but prior to first line of treatment, 3% prior to third line, the remaining 14% were tested following third line. Conclusion: A third (31%) of patients failed to receive RAS testing, therefore all treatment options were unavailable to them. These data highlight how universal testing has not been achieved.

Biomarker testing and mutation prevalence in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in five European countries using a large oncology database.

Background: The literature on biomarker testing for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Europe is scarce. This study aimed to estimate the percentage of mCRC patients from five European countries tested for biomarkers over time. Materials & methods: An oncology database was retrospectively analyzed; evaluated biomarkers were RAS, BRAF and microsatellite instability (MSI). The patients were drug treated during 2018 and tested for relevant biomarkers in 2013-2018. Results: RAS testing was conducted in >90% of mCRC patients from 2014 onwards. BRAF testing increased from 31% of mCRC patients in 2013 to 67% in 2018. MSI testing increased from 10 to 41%. There was no notable trend over time for RAS and BRAF mutation or MSI-high prevalence. Conclusion: Biomarker testing among patients diagnosed with mCRC was increased over time. This study demonstrates the quick uptake of biomarker testing in clinical practice. These findings are significant as biomarker-based drugs are becoming more common.

Lay abstract Each patient's cancer is unique. To find the best medicine for each patient, doctors perform tests to look at the cancer's genes. It is unknown how often and how well these tests are done. We tried to find this out for patients with cancer of the bowel or rectum that has spread to other organs. We found that an important genetic test called RAS is done in most patients. Other tests, called BRAF and microsatellite instability, are also conducted increasingly frequently. This is important because the results of such tests allow doctors to decide which drug(s) should be the most effective depending on the patient's cancer genes.

Impact of biomarkers and primary tumor location on the metastatic colorectal cancer first-line treatment landscape in five European countries.

Background: Advances in therapies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and improved understanding of prognostic and predictive factors have impacted treatment decisions. Materials & methods: This study used a large oncology database to investigate patterns of monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus chemotherapy treatment in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK in mCRC patients treated in first line in 2018. Results: Anti-EGFR mAbs were most often administered to patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and those with left-sided tumors, while anti-VEGF mAbs were preferred in RAS mutant and right-sided tumors. Adopted treatment strategies differed between countries, largely due to reimbursement. Conclusion: Biomarker status and primary tumor location steered treatment decisions in first line. Adopted treatment strategies differed between participating countries.

Lay abstract Each patient's cancer is unique. For example, colon cancer on the left side is different from colon cancer on the right side. Colon cancer is different from cancer of the rectum. Cancers also have changes in their genes, which means some treatments should work, while others may not. Doctors can select among different medicines to find the drug that works best for each patient. We looked at patients with cancer of the colon or rectum that has spread to other organs. We tried to find out how doctors in Europe select drugs for their patients after performing tests called RAS or BRAF. We found that doctors make different choices in different countries.

Discharge status and post-discharge healthcare costs after skeletal-related event hospitalizations among medicare patients with bone metastatic solid tumors or multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have quantified direct inpatient costs of skeletal-related events (SREs); however, costs associated with subsequent post-SRE care have not been examined. METHODS: We identified two study cohorts using 2011-2015 Medicare 20% sample data: patients diagnosed with 1) bone metastases from solid tumors or 2) multiple myeloma (MM), both with SRE-related hospitalization discharge dates January 1, 2011-September 30, 2015. We assessed discharge status and costs from discharge to the earliest of death, end of Medicare enrollment, or December 31, 2015. Discharge status was defined as: skilled nursing facility (SNF), rehabilitation facility, hospice, home health agency (HHA), long-term care (LTC) nursing home, LTC hospital, or rehospitalization within or after 30 days. Percentage, stay duration, and Medicare costs were calculated for each setting. All analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: We identified 7988 bone metastases patients and 4277 MM patients discharged from index SRE-related hospitalizations; corresponding mean ages were 76.9 and 76.6 years. The largest proportion of bone metastases patients were discharged to SNF (32.9%), then HHA (13.7%), hospice (13.5%), and LTC (11.3%); the pattern was similar for MM patients (SNF, 35.9%; HHA, 18.2%; hospice, 7.2%; LTC, 1.5%). Almost 10% of patients in both cohorts were re-hospitalized within 30 days. Mean Medicare cost per patient per facility stay was < $10,000 for hospice, and from $15,517 for LTC nursing home to $49,729 for LTC hospital for MM patients. CONCLUSION: Most elderly cancer patients (>75%) require healthcare facility support after SRE-related hospitalization, with substantial associated costs. Post-discharge management is clinically and economically important.

A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Describing the Prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Gene Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumors of the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients that are wildtype (WT) for KRAS or NRAS mutations respond more favorably to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatments. Treatment guidelines now recommend that all mCRC patients have WT KRAS and NRAS tumor status confirmed prior to initiating anti-EGFR therapy. Evidence also suggests that BRAF mutations may predict lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy. As such, there is now a need for comprehensive data on the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations among patients with mCRC. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted among studies that described the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF gene mutations in mCRC patients. Observational cohort studies and standard of care arm of randomized clinical trials were included. Random effects meta-analysis models were used to create summary prevalence estimates for each of the mutation types. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Exploratory analyses of overall and progression-free survival by mutation status were also conducted. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 275 studies comprising 77,104 mCRC patients. The summary prevalence estimate was 35.9% for KRAS mutations, 7.1% for BRAF mutations, and 4.1% for NRAS mutations. Female patients had significantly more KRAS and BRAF mutations than males, and significant variation by study location was observed for both KRAS and BRAF mutation prevalence. Overall survival was significantly decreased for patients with KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations compared to those with WT tumors. Progression-free survival was also significantly decreased among patients with KRAS and BRAF mutations. CONCLUSIONS: KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation statuses in patients with mCRC are important predictors of treatment success and may also have prognostic value. In this paper we present the first systematic and comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations and demonstrate the prognostic impact of mutation status on survival.

Management of EGFR Inhibitor-induced Skin Toxicity and Factors Impacting Patients' Adherence to Skin Toxicity Treatment: Health Care Provider and Patient Surveys in European Oncology Centers.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to provide a description of existing measures for the prevention and management of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities and factors impacting patients' adherence to those measures in France, Germany, and Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 2 separate surveys. Health care professionals (HCPs; oncologists and nurses) in France, Germany, and Spain were interviewed, and patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and head-and-neck cancer in France and Germany self-completed questionnaires. The study was conducted between February and July 2018. RESULTS: A total of 53 oncologists, 44 nurses, and 143 patients participated in the study. HCPs stated that skin toxicities moderately (52%) or severely (28%) impacted patient care. Ninety percent of HCPs reported routine provision of prophylactic measures. The great majority of patients self-reported adherence with the prophylactic (80% to 88% depending on the type of measures) and reactive (93% to drug prescription) skin toxicity recommendations. HCPs estimated patient adherence to be 45% for full adherence and 40% for partial adherence. Most HCPs reported a positive or very positive impact of preventive measures and recommendations on skin toxicity incidence and severity, patients' quality of life, and various aspects of quality of anti-cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Skin toxicities are an important adversity negatively impacting on patient care. However, despite the positive perception of the effectiveness of skin toxicity prophylaxis, almost one-third of oncology centers did not provide formal guidelines, and 10% of HCPs did not provide routine prophylactic measures. Patient adherence appears to be high for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicity prevention measures.

The Healthcare Professionals' Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe.

PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitative self-completion questionnaires and asked healthcare professionals about the impact of SIRs and consequent actions taken. RESULTS: The procedures to prevent and manage SIRs were similar across countries and settings. In all countries, they were part of a larger risk-assessment and adverse events-prevention process. Preventive measures included patient history, risk assessment, pre-medication, and close monitoring of high-risk patients. The management procedures comprised stopping the infusion, triggering of the emergency chain, administering corticosteroids ± antihistamines, and hospitalization if necessary. The recalled SIRs had important consequences to affected patients, healthcare providers, and hospital organizational plans. All affected patients needed to be monitored closely for a prolonged time, thus blocking hospital beds. 44% of patients needed to be hospitalized, 17% needed resuscitation, and one patient died of cardiac arrest immediately after the start of the infusion. Importantly, 82% of patients were not re-challenged with the presumedly SIR-causing regimen or re-challenged in a later line. CONCLUSION: SIRs are unpredictable in nature, may have an extremely rapid onset, and are potentially fatal. Such events have a profound impact on the affected and surrounding patients, the care team and the organizational plan of the day-hospitals. Specific tools to reliably identify high-risk patients and predict the occurrence of events are needed.

Prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients by tumor sidedness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Studies have shown that the prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations may differ by tumor sidedness among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Both mutation status and tumor sidedness may impact survival and disease progression and RAS mutation status has been shown to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of RAS and BRAF mutations by tumor sidedness in studies of mCRC patients. Forty-four studies comprising 15 981 mCRC patients tested for RAS and/or BRAF mutations were included in the meta-analyses. The prevalence of RAS mutations differed significantly by tumor side (32.4% among left-sided tumors, 41.3% among right-sided tumors; P = .017), as did the prevalence of KRAS mutations (35.8% among left-sided tumors, 46.3% among right-sided tumors; P < .0001) and BRAF mutations (4.3% among left-sided tumors, 16.3% among right-sided tumors; P < .0001). Among right-sided tumors, the prevalence of RAS and KRAS mutations varied significantly by study design, with higher prevalence among observational studies than clinical trials, and there was significant variation by study location for the prevalence of KRAS mutations in left-sided tumors and the prevalence of BRAF mutations in right-sided tumors. These results help to better characterize the mCRC population to better inform clinicians and researchers. Few of the included studies reported overall or progression-free survival (PFS) by both tumor sidedness and mutation status. As both of these factors may have prognostic impact, future studies should consider evaluating survival by these variables.

A Multinational Assessment of Gastric, Esophageal, and Colorectal Cancer Burden: A Report of Disease Incidence, Prevalence, and Fatality.

INTRODUCTION: Digestive cancers, including colorectal, stomach, and esophageal cancer, represent one-third of all new cancer cases in the world. This comprehensive analysis seeks to summarize the burden of digestive system cancers on a global scale, within specific countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. METHODS: Burden is measured using prevalence, incidence, and case-fatality rates. Estimates of incidence rates and case-fatality ratios were further stratified by gender and age group (< 65 years and ≥ 65 years). RESULTS: In general, these data highlight differences in the prevalence and incidence of gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancers by gender and region. Large variations in case-fatality rates by gender and age are also present. CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate the worldwide burden of digestive diseases and may help guide resource allocation to decrease the impact of digestive cancers around the world.

The incidence of infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibody drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of patient and study characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Systemic cancer therapies may induce infusion reactions (IRs) or hypersensitivities. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with anti-EGFR therapies, including cetuximab and panitumumab, may be subject to these reactions. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the IR incidence in this population and identify variations in this incidence by patient or study characteristics. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify observational studies or clinical trials of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR therapies that reported occurrences of IRs, hypersensitivity, or allergy/anaphylaxis. The objective of the study was to estimate the incidence of IRs. Random effects models were used to meta-analyze the incidence of IRs overall and stratified by therapy type, study design, geographic location, RAS or KRAS mutation status, grade of reaction severity, and terminology used to describe the reaction. RESULTS: The pooled estimate for IR incidence was 4.9% (95% confidence interval: 3.6%-6.5%). Lower-grade reactions were more common than higher-grade reactions overall and the incidence of reactions among cetuximab patients was nearly four times that of panitumumab patients (6.1% vs 1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: IRs occur in approximately 5% of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR therapies, and the incidence varies significantly by grade of severity and therapy type. Studies evaluating these outcomes should consider investigating survival outcomes by IR status to determine its prognostic relevance.

A National Survey of Medical Oncologist's Opinions and Perceptions for Managing Rash Among mCRC Patients Treated with Panitumumab.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe medical oncologist's opinions and perceptions regarding the management of dermatologic toxicities among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who were treated with panitumumab in the USA and assess if there were differences across demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We developed a survey based on the current literature and expert opinions regarding the management of dermatologic toxicities. The survey was implemented online in September 2016. Eligible oncologists were board certified and had treated at least five new or continuing patients with mCRC in the last 3 months, among whom at least three patients had received or were currently receiving panitumumab. RESULTS: A total of 250 oncologists completed the survey. The data suggest that approximately 82% of patients received recommendations for moisturizer, 88% for sunscreen and 67% for ultraviolet (UV)-protective garments prior to or at the time of initiation of panitumumab therapy. There were minor differences in how dermatologic toxicities were managed across specific demographic or clinical groups. The data also suggest that the management associated with panitumumab use among mCRC patients can be greatly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the urgent need for heightened education regarding dermatologic toxicity management among oncologists who treated mCRC patients with panitumumab. Easily implemented strategies, such as moisturizer, sunscreen, and UV-protective garments should be recommended to all patients. FUNDING: Amgen, Inc. Plain language summary available for this article.

Vitamin D Supplementation to Treat Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms: A Review.

For the past 15 years, cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States and worldwide. With an aging population, there has been increasing use of statin therapy to reduce the risk of CVD. However, statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) remain an obstacle to this treatment, leading to discontinuation and nonadherence to statin therapy. Signs and symptoms of SAMS include muscle pain, tenderness, and increased serum creatine kinase. Despite the idiopathic pathophysiology of SAMS, some studies have shown an association between vitamin D deficiency and SAMS; the use of vitamin D supplements can lead to relief of these symptoms. The purpose of this review was to critique evidence for the association between low serum vitamin D and SAMS and the use of vitamin D supplementation for treatment.

Dermatologic Toxicities: A Chart Review of Clinical Management Among Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Panitumumab.

BACKGROUND: At least 90% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are treated with an anti-EGFR will develop a dermatologic toxicity. Preemptive management strategies have been shown to reduce the severity of rash. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to describe treatment modalities used for the management of dermatologic toxicity among patients with mCRC who were treated with panitumumab and to assess the proportion of patients who were recommended preemptive versus reactive management strategies. METHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated different treatment modalities and routes of administration. The modalities were categorized as prescription or over-the-counter. The timing in relation to the first dose of panitumumab was used to define preemptive versus reactive treatments. FINDINGS: In a sample of 330 patients, only 10% of patients were recommended to begin treatment for rash preemptively. The two most common treatment modalities for preemptively and reactively treated patients were prescription oral antibiotics and prescription topical antibiotics.

European follow-up of incorrect biomarker results for colorectal cancer demonstrates the importance of quality improvement projects.

Biomarker analysis for colorectal cancer has been shown to be reliable in Europe with 97% of samples tested by EQA participants to be correctly classified. This study focuses on errors during the annual EQA assessment. The aim was to explore the causes and actions related to the observed errors and to provide feedback and assess any improvement between 2016 and 2017. An electronic survey was sent to all laboratories with minimum one genotyping error or technical failure on ten tumor samples. A workshop was organized based on 2016 survey responses. Improvement of performance in 2017 was assessed for returning participants (n = 76), survey respondents (n = 13) and workshop participants (n = 4). Survey respondents and workshop participants improved in terms of (maximum) analysis score, successful participation, and genotyping errors compared to all returning participants. In 2016, mostly pre- and post-analytical errors (both 25%) were observed caused by unsuitability of the tumor tissue for molecular analysis. In 2017, most errors were due to analytical problems (50.0%) caused by methodological problems. The most common actions taken (n = 58) were protocol revisions (34.5%) and staff training (15.5%). In 24.1% of issues identified no action was performed. Corrective actions were linked to an improved performance, especially if performed by the pathologist. Although biomarker testing has improved over time, error occurrence at different phases stresses the need for quality improvement throughout the test process. Participation to quality improvement projects and a close collaboration with the pathologist can have a positive influence on performance.

Racial and Ethnic Variability in the Prevalence and Incidence of Comorbidities Associated with Gastric Cancer in the United States.

PURPOSE: Comorbidities are known to impact quality of life, treatment choices, and survival. Our objectives were to characterize comorbid conditions in a cohort of elderly gastric cancer patients and to determine if there is variability in the prevalence or incidence of the comorbid conditions across racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: A total of 12,612 individuals, ≥66 years of age, diagnosed with gastric cancer between 2000 and 2007, and an equal number of gender- and region-matched cancer-free individuals, were identified using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked to Medicare claims in the United States. The prevalence (%) in the year before diagnosis and the 12-month incidence rates after diagnosis were estimated for 32 chronic and ten acute comorbid conditions for the entire cohort and by race/ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, and other) and Asian subgroups (e.g., Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Pacific Islander). RESULTS: White and Black cases exhibited the highest prevalence of most comorbid conditions. Asian and Pacific Islander cases exhibited the lowest. There was substantial variability in the 12-month incidence of the comorbidities across the racial/ethnic groups. Electrolyte disorder was the most common incident condition among Whites and Blacks. With the exception of Whites, anemia was the most common incident condition in all racial and ethnic groups 180 days following chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in the prevalence and incidence in comorbidities across racial/ethnic groups.

Changes in secondary hyperparathyroidism-related biochemical parameters and medication use following parathyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about changes in parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and phosphorous levels after parathyroidectomy in hemodialysis patients. We studied the effects of parathyroidectomy on these biochemical values in a large cohort of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients identified in both the United States Renal Data System and the database of a large dialysis organization who underwent parathyroidectomy in 2007-09, were aged ≥ 18 years, had Medicare Parts A and B as primary payer and had received hemodialysis for ≥ 1 year pre-parathyroidectomy. Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous variables; categorical variables were used to characterize the population and evaluate monthly laboratory and medication use; median values were calculated for laboratory measures. RESULTS: Among 1402 parathyroidectomy patients, mean age was 48.9 years, 52.4% were males, 58.8% were African American and mean dialysis duration was 7.5 years. Median PTH levels increased over the year before parathyroidectomy from 1039 to 1661 pg/mL and decreased afterward to 98 pg/mL at 1 month; levels remained ≥ 897 pg/mL for 10% of patients. Median calcium levels fell from 9.6 mg/dL before to 7.9 mg/dL 1 month after parathyroidectomy; levels were ≤ 7.1 mg/dL for 25% and remained ≤ 7.2 mg/dL for the lowest 25% at 3 months. Median phosphorous level was 6.8 mg/dL immediately before parathyroidectomy, decreased to 3.8 mg/dL immediately after and reached 5.8 mg/dL at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: While PTH levels dropped after parathyroidectomy for most patients, surgery was sometimes ineffective in reducing levels and sometimes led to over-suppression. Hypocalcemia could be profound and long lasting, suggesting the need for prolonged vigilance.