Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 49(2): 289-92, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25220048

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measuring quality of care delivery is essential to palliative care program growth and sustainability. We formed the Carolinas Consortium for Palliative Care and collected a quality data registry to monitor our practice and inform quality improvement efforts. MEASURES: We analyzed all palliative care consultations in patients with cancer in our quality registry from March 2008 through October 2011 using 18 palliative care quality measures. Descriptive metric adherence was calculated after analyzing the relevant population for measurement. INTERVENTION: We used a paper-based, prospective method to monitor adherence for quality measures in a community-based palliative care consortium. OUTCOMES: We demonstrate that measures evaluating process assessment (range 63%-100%), as opposed to interventions (range 3%-17%), are better documented. CONCLUSIONS/LESSONS LEARNED: Analyzing data on quality is feasible and valuable in community-based palliative care. Overall, processes to collect data on quality using nontechnology methods may underestimate true adherence to quality measures.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 130(3): 426-30, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23769759

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if early palliative care intervention in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is potentially cost saving or cost-effective. METHODS: A decision model with a 6 month time horizon evaluated routine care versus routine care plus early referral to a palliative medicine specialist (EPC) for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Model parameters included rates of inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, chemotherapy administration, and quality of life (QOL). From published ovarian cancer data, we assumed baseline rates over the final 6 months: hospitalization 70%, chemotherapy 60%, and ED visit 30%. Published data from a randomized trial evaluating EPC in metastatic lung cancer were used to model odds ratios (ORs) for potential reductions in hospitalization (OR 0.69), chemotherapy (OR 0.77), and emergency department care (OR 0.74) and improvement in QOL (OR 1.07). The costs of hospitalization, ED visit, chemotherapy, and EPC were based on published data. Ranges were used for sensitivity analysis. Effectiveness was quantified in quality adjusted life years (QALYs); survival was assumed equivalent between strategies. RESULTS: EPC was associated with a cost savings of $1285 per patient over routine care. In sensitivity analysis incorporating QOL, EPC was either dominant or cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) <$50,000/QALY, unless the cost of outpatient EPC exceeded $2400. Assuming no clinical benefit other than QOL (no change in chemotherapy administration, hospitalizations or ED visits), EPC remained highly cost-effective with ICER $37,440/QALY. CONCLUSION: Early palliative care intervention has the potential to reduce costs associated with end of life care in patients with ovarian cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Assistência Terminal/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Metástase Neoplásica , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Compostos de Platina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 131(1): 215-21, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23774302

RESUMO

Despite the increasing availability of palliative care, oncology providers often misunderstand and underutilize these resources. The goals of palliative care are relief of suffering and provision of the best possible quality of life for both the patient and her family, regardless of where she is in the natural history of her disease. Lack of understanding and awareness of the services provided by palliative care physicians underlie barriers to referral. Oncologic providers spend a significant amount of time palliating the symptoms of cancer and its treatment; involvement of specialty palliative care providers can assist in managing the complex patient. Patients with gynecologic malignancies remain an ideal population for palliative care intervention. This review of the literature explores the current state of palliative care in the treatment of gynecologic cancers and its implications for the quality and cost of this treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Análise Custo-Benefício , Educação Médica , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...