Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiographics ; 36(6): 1746-1758, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27726746

RESUMO

Osteoarthritis of the hip remains a prevalent disease condition that influences ever-changing treatment options. Procedures performed to correct anatomic variations, and, in turn, prevent or slow the progression of osteoarthritis, are aptly referred to as types of hip preservation surgery (HPS). Conditions that predispose individuals to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), including pincer- and cam-type morphology, and hip dysplasia are specifically targeted in HPS. Common surgical interventions include acetabuloplasty, osteochondroplasty, periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and derotational femoral osteotomy (DFO). The radiologist's understanding of the surgical approach, pre- and postoperative imaging findings, and common complications of HPS are paramount to providing value to the patient and surgeon. Acetabuloplasty and osteochondroplasty are performed to address pincer- and cam-type morphology in patients with FAI. With both of these HPS techniques, the goal is to restore the normal morphology by resecting excess bone in the acetabulum or femoral head or neck. As a result, a frequently encountered complication is incomplete or excessive resection. Excessive resection can predispose the patient to dislocation in the case of acetabuloplasty and fracture in the case of osteochondroplasty. Iatrogenic injury to adjacent structures such as the ischiofemoral ligament and acetabular cartilage also may occur. Although rare, especially when an arthroscopic approach is used, avascular necrosis remains a risk. Femoral head undercoverage in hip dysplasia is corrected by using PAO, which may be performed as the sole procedure or in conjunction with DFO. Incomplete or excessive rotation during surgery can result in postprocedural complications. As with any orthopedic procedure involving osteotomy, nonhealing is a risk. Iatrogenic injury in the form of fracture or hardware failure also may be seen. ©RSNA, 2016.


Assuntos
Artrografia/métodos , Impacto Femoroacetabular/diagnóstico por imagem , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Quadril/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Artroplastia/efeitos adversos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Impacto Femoroacetabular/etiologia , Impacto Femoroacetabular/terapia , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/etiologia , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/terapia , Lesões do Quadril/etiologia , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Osteoartrite do Quadril/complicações , Osteotomia/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 204(3): W289-92, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25714314

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE. This article describes the creation of a virtual workstation for use by medical students and implementation of that workstation in the reading room. CONCLUSION. A radiology virtual workstation for medical students was created using OsiriX imaging software to authentically simulate the experience of interacting with cases selected to cover important musculoskeletal imaging diagnoses. A workstation that allows the manipulation and interpretation of complete anonymized DICOM images may enhance the educational experience of medical students.


Assuntos
Instrução por Computador , Educação Médica/métodos , Radiologia/educação , Software , Interface Usuário-Computador
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...