Intensive recreational athletes in the prospective multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry: Results from the European cohort.

BACKGROUND: In the ICD Sports Safety Registry, death, arrhythmia- or shock-related physical injury did not occur in athletes who continue competitive sports after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. However, data from non-competitive ICD recipients is lacking. This report describes arrhythmic events and lead performance in intensive recreational athletes with ICDs enrolled in the European recreational arm of the Registry, and compares their outcome with those of the competitive athletes in the Registry. METHODS: The Registry recruited 317 competitive athletes ≥ 18 years old, receiving an ICD for primary or secondary prevention (234 US; 83 non-US). In Europe, Israel and Australia only, an additional cohort of 80 'auto-competitive' recreational athletes was also included, engaged in intense physical activity on a regular basis (≥2×/week and/or ≥ 2 h/week) with the explicit aim to improve their physical performance limits. Athletes were followed for a median of 44 and 49 months, respectively. ICD shock data and clinical outcomes were adjudicated by three electrophysiologists. RESULTS: Compared with competitive athletes, recreational athletes were older (median 44 vs. 37 years; p = 0.0004), more frequently men (79% vs. 68%; p = 0.06), with less idiopathic ventricular fibrillation or catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (1.3% vs. 15.4%), less congenital heart disease (1.3% vs. 6.9%) and more arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (23.8% vs. 13.6%) ( p < 0.001). They more often had a prophylactic ICD implant (51.4% vs. 26.9%; p < 0.0001) or were given a beta-blocker (95% vs. 65%; p < 0.0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction, ICD rate cut-off and time from implant were similar. Recreational athletes performed fewer hours of sports per week (median 4.5 vs. 6 h; p = 0.0004) and fewer participated in sports with burst-performances ( vs. endurance) as their main sports: 4% vs. 65% ( p < 0.0001). None of the athletes in either group died, required external resuscitation or was injured due to arrhythmia or shock. Freedom from definite or probable lead malfunction was similar (5-year 97% vs. 96%; 10-year 93% vs. 91%). Recreational athletes received fewer total shocks (13.8% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.01) due to fewer inappropriate shocks (2.5% vs. 12%; p = 0.01). The proportion receiving appropriate shocks was similar (12.5% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.51). Recreational athletes received fewer total (6.3% vs. 20.2%; p = 0.003), appropriate (3.8% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.06) and inappropriate (2.5% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.04) shocks during physical activity. Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation storms during physical activity occurred in 0/80 recreational vs. 7/317 competitive athletes. Appropriate shocks during physical activity were related to underlying disease ( p = 0.004) and competitive versus recreational sports ( p = 0.004), but there was no relation with age, gender, type of indication, beta-blocker use or burst/endurance sports. The proportion of athletes who stopped sports due to shocks was similar (3.8% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Participants in recreational sports had less frequent appropriate and inappropriate shocks during physical activity than participants in competitive sports. Shocks did not cause death or injury. Recreational athletes with ICDs can engage in sports without severe adverse outcomes unless other reasons preclude continuation.

Device therapy and hospital reimbursement practices across European countries: a heterogeneous scenario.

As in other settings, in the field of clinical use of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), the implementation, in various ways, of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) has created new scenarios in most European healthcare systems. A DRG system is primarily a financial tool with the aim of promoting efficiency and improving utilization of resources. However, there are a variety of ways in which this system is used for funding the activity of centres implanting CIEDs. It is possible that the specific type and method of reimbursement may influence the implementation of CIEDs in the 'real world' through a variable spectrum of practices. These may range from the situation where reimbursement may, together with other factors, constitute a true barrier to the implementation of guidelines, to scenarios where reimbursement is adequate, and/or to situations where reimbursement may be adequate for standard devices but not for prompt implementation of effective technological innovations. The variety in reimbursement also affects how in-office checks of CIEDs are covered and, above all, the possibility to pay for remote follow-up of CIEDs. In the field of medical devices, refinement of DRG systems and adoption of new strategies and policies are needed to sustain and enhance those effective technological innovations that may be beneficial for specific patient populations. It is also important that physicians are deeply involved in the development and deployment of DRGs, and that each country DRGs agency has a transparent approach to engagement with stakeholders, along with robust and transparent mechanisms for updating these systems.

Morphology discrimination criterion wavelet improves rhythm discrimination in single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Spanish Register of morphology discrimination criterion wavelet (REMEDIO).

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly being used for treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/fibrillation. Inappropriate therapy delivery remains the most frequent complication in patients with ICDs, resulting in psychological distress, proarrhythmia, and battery life reduction. We aim to determine if inappropriate therapies could be reduced by using a morphology discrimination criterion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the performance of the Wavelet morphology discrimination algorithm (Medtronic, Inc.) independently from other discrimination enhancements (rate onset and interval stability). A non-randomized, prospective, multicenter, and observational study was designed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the new morphology criterion. Sensitivity and specificity in slow tachycardia with cycle length (CL) between 340 and 500 ms were analysed as a pre-specified secondary endpoint. A total of 771 spontaneous episodes in 106 patients were analysed. Five hundred and twenty-two episodes corresponded to true supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with ventricular CL in the VT or FVT zone, of which 473 had therapy appropriately withheld. Of the 249 episodes of true VT/FVT, 21 were classified according to the Wavelet criteria as SVT (specificity: 90.6%; sensitivity: 91.6%). All of them were spontaneously terminated with no adverse clinical consequences. No syncopal episodes occurred. For VTs in the slowest analysed range (CL: 340-500 ms), a total of 235 episodes were studied, yielding a specificity of 95.9% and sensitivity of 83.2%. CONCLUSION: Wavelet discrimination criteria in single-chamber ICDs as the sole discriminator can significantly reduce inappropriate therapy for SVT, not only in the range of VTs in the slowest analysed range (340-500 ms for this study) but also for faster VTs. No significant clinical consequences were found when the algorithm was used, but final data should prompt the use of the algorithm in combination with a high rate time-out feature.