Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 60(4): 402-410, 2022 Jul 04.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35816653

RESUMO

Background: Hand injuries resulting from accidents at work are one of the main causes of disability in workers. Every worker ruled with Partial Permanent Disability must legally be reinstated to the same workplace. Objective: To know the prevalence of reintegration and causes of non-reintegration into workers with Partial Permanent Disability due to hand injuries. Material and methods: A descriptive, observational, and retrospective study, which included 100% of the opinions of Parcial Permanent Disability due to hand injuries, generated from 2012 to 2016 at UMF 61 of Veracruz. Results: 143 cases were analyzed, 127 (88.8%) were men and 16 (11.2%) women, with a mean age of 37.3 ± 11.6 years. Labor reintegration in the same company occurred in 60 (42%) of the cases, 50 (35%) were reinstated in another company and 33 (23.1%) were not reinstated to work. Regarding work termination: 51 (35.7%) workers were laid off after their ruling, 13 (9.1%) resigned, 12 (8.4%) terminated their contract, and 7 (4.9%) were retired. Currently 72 (50.3%) workers continue to perform physical work and 18 (12.6%) did not return to work. Conclusions: Labor reintegration occurred in less than half of the cases ruled. The main cause of the non-reintegration was the unjustified dismissal by the company where the accident occurred. Not reintegrating into the same workplace has: legal, economic, medical and social implications to the worker.


Introducción: las lesiones de mano derivadas de accidentes de trabajo constituyen una de las principales causas de discapacidad en los trabajadores. Todo trabajador dictaminado con Incapacidad Permanente Parcial (IPP), jurídicamente debe ser reinsertado a su mismo centro de trabajo. Objetivo: conocer la prevalencia de reinserción y causas de no reinserción laboral en trabajadores con IPP por lesiones de mano. Material y Métodos: estudio descriptivo, observacional y retrospectivo, que incluyó el 100% de los dictámenes de IPP por lesiones de mano, generados del 2012 al 2016 en la UMF 61 de Veracruz. Resultados: se analizaron 143 casos, 127 (88.8%) fueron hombres y 16 (11.2%) mujeres, con edad media 37.3 ± 11.6 años. La reinserción laboral en la misma empresa se presentó en 60 (42%) de los casos, 50 (35%) se reinsertaron en otra empresa y 33 (23.1%) no se reinsertaron al trabajo. Respecto de la terminación laboral: 51 (35.7%) trabajadores fueron despedidos posterior a su dictaminación, 13 (9.1%) renunciaron, 12 (8.4%) finalizaron su contrato, y 7 (4.9%) fueron jubilados. Actualmente 72 (50.3%) trabajadores continúa realizando un trabajo físico y 18 (12.6%) no volvió a trabajar. Conclusiones: la reinserción laboral se presentó en menos de la mitad de los casos. La principal causa de no reinserción fue el despido injustificado por la empresa donde ocurrió el accidente. No reintegrarse al mismo centro de trabajo conlleva implicaciones: legales, económicas, médicas y sociales al trabajador.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Traumatismos da Mão , Acidentes de Trabalho , Adulto , Emprego , Feminino , Traumatismos da Mão/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Local de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...