Effects of losartan on whole body, skeletal muscle and vascular insulin responses in obesity/insulin resistance without hypertension.

AIMS: Renin-angiotensin system antagonists have been found to improve glucose metabolism in obese hypertensive and type 2 diabetic subjects. The mechanism of these effects is not well understood. We hypothesized that the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan would improve insulin-mediated vasodilation, and thereby improve insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle of insulin-resistant subjects. METHODS: We studied subjects with obesity and insulin resistance but without hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia or dysglycaemia [age 39.0 ± 9.6 yr (mean ± SD), body mass index (BMI) 33.2 ± 5.9 kg/m(2) , BP 115.8 ± 12.2/70.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, LDL 2.1 ± 0.5 mmol/l]. Subjects were randomized to 12 weeks' double-blind treatment with losartan 100 mg once daily (n = 9) or matching placebo (n = 8). Before and after treatment, under hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp conditions we measured whole-body insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, insulin-mediated vasodilation, and insulin-stimulated leg glucose uptake by the limb balance technique. RESULTS: Whole-body insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was not significantly increased by losartan. Insulin-mediated vasodilation was augmented following both treatments [increase in leg vascular conductance: pretreatment 0.7 ± 0.3 l/min/mmHg (losartan, mean ± SEM) and 0.9 ± 0.3 (placebo), posttreatment 1.0 ± 0.4 (losartan) and 1.3 ± 0.6 (placebo)] but not different between treatment groups (p = 0.53). Insulin's action to augment nitric oxide (NO) production and to augment endothelium-dependent vasodilation was also not improved. Leg glucose uptake was not significantly changed by treatments, and not different between groups (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: These findings argue against the hypothesis that losartan might improve skeletal muscle glucose metabolism by improving insulin-mediated vasodilation in normotensive insulin-resistant obese subjects. The metabolic benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers may require the presence of hypertension in addition to obesity-associated insulin resistance.

A cross-sectional evaluation of seasonality as a determinant of endothelial function.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in obese versus lean humans. We set out to evaluate whether agonist-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilation varies by season in a cross-sectional dataset of lean and obese humans, and whether this effect differed by obesity status. All vascular studies performed in our laboratory over a 12 year period from 1997 to 2009 were evaluated. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was measured invasively using thermodilution in the leg as the response to intra-arterially infused methacholine chloride. Resting blood pressure was measured concurrently by cuff and intra-arterially. The association of endothelium-dependent vasodilation and blood pressure measurements with season was evaluated, comparing responses in lean and obese subjects. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation differed between lean and obese subjects, and varied across seasons (p=0.02), but without an interaction between season effect and obesity status. The proportion of obese versus lean subjects differed significantly across seasons in our dataset, and after adjusting for this factor the apparent seasonal variation in endothelium-dependent vasodilation was lost (p=0.12), and was not present in either lean or obese subjects separately. Systolic arterial blood pressure varied across seasons, and this effect remained significant after adjusting obesity status (p=0.019 and p=0.043 for blood pressures measured intra-arterially and by cuff respectively). In our cross-sectional dataset, seasonal variations in blood pressure were seen but we did not observe an association between season and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in lean or obese subjects.

Contributions of dysglycaemia, obesity, and insulin resistance to impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans.

BACKGROUND: Individual effects of hyperglycaemia and obesity to impair vascular health are recognized. However, the relative contributions of dysglycaemia versus other obesity-related traits to vascular dysfunction have not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional evaluation of factors contributing to vascular function in 271 consecutive subjects, categorized as non-obese normal glucose tolerant (n = 115), non-obese dysglycaemic (n = 32), obese normal glucose tolerant (n = 57), obese dysglycaemic (n = 38), or type 2 diabetic (n = 29). Vascular function was measured invasively as leg blood flow responses to methacholine chloride, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator. Categorical and continuous analyses were carried out to assess the contributions of hyperglycaemia to vascular dysfunction. RESULTS: Even among normoglycaemic subjects, obese subjects had impaired vascular function compared to non-obese subjects (p = 0.004). Vascular function was also impaired in non-obese dysglycaemic subjects (p = 0.04 versus non-obese normoglycaemic subjects), to a level comparable to normoglycaemic obese subjects. Within obese subject groups, gradations of dysglycaemia including the presence of diabetes were not associated with further worsening of these vascular responses beyond the effect of obesity alone (p = not significant comparing all obese groups, p < 0.001 versus lean normoglycaemic subjects). After univariate and multivariable modelling analyses we found that effects of glycaemia were less powerful than effects of insulin resistance and obesity on vascular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Dysglycaemia contributes to impaired vascular function in non-obese subjects, but obesity and insulin resistance are more important determinants of vascular function in obese and diabetic subjects.

Obesity, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome: determinants of endothelial dysfunction in whites and blacks.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is strongly associated with obesity and other components of the metabolic syndrome (MS). The relative importance of these components in the determination of endothelial function is unknown. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence about whether ethnic differences exist in the relative importance of these components in regard to other cardiovascular outcomes. We evaluated the contributions of insulin resistance, obesity, and the other components of the MS to impaired endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relationships of the MS components (as defined according the National Cholesterol Education Program) and insulin resistance (estimated using the homeostasis model) with endothelium-dependent vasodilation were examined in 42 white and 55 black subjects. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed as the increment in leg blood flow (measured by thermodilution) after exposure to methacholine chloride. Waist circumference, glucose, blood pressure, and insulin resistance distributions did not differ between ethnic groups; blacks in our sample had higher HDL cholesterol (1.31 versus 1.09 mmol/L; P<0.001) and lower triglyceride levels (1.01 versus 1.37 mmol/L; P=0.005) than white subjects. In the absence of the MS, black subjects exhibited reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilation compared with white subjects (P=0.005), and both groups demonstrated significantly worse endothelial function when the MS was present (maximal increase in leg blood flow: blacks: 107+/-9% MS absent, 53+/-16% MS present; whites: 163+/-16% MS absent, 54+/-18% MS absent; P=0.007, MS absent versus present; P=NS for interaction of ethnicity and MS). Multivariable regression analysis examining relationships of endothelial function with the 5 MS components (analyzed as continuous variables) revealed independent relationships only with waist circumference (P=0.01) and systolic blood pressure (P=0.02). Waist circumference was no longer independently associated after adding insulin resistance to the modeling (P=0.02 for log of homeostasis model index of insulin resistance, P=0.02 for systolic blood pressure). Ethnicity still exerted an independent effect on endothelial function after accounting for the above components (P=0.04 for an additional effect of ethnic status on endothelial function), with an ethnic difference in the effect of insulin resistance on endothelial function (P=0.046 for interaction of ethnicity and log of homeostasis model index of insulin resistance). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that insulin resistance and systolic blood pressure are the principal determinants of endothelial dysfunction in the MS and that there are ethnic differences in the relative importance of these factors. These differences may imply different benefits from treatments targeting blood pressure or insulin resistance in different ethnic groups.