Using Omics to Identify Novel Therapeutic Targets in Heart Failure.

Omics refers to the measurement and analysis of the totality of molecules or biological processes involved within an organism. Examples of omics data include genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and more. In this review, we present the available literature reporting omics data on heart failure that can inform the development of novel treatments or innovative treatment strategies for this disease. This includes polygenic risk scores to improve prediction of genomic data and the potential of multiomics to more efficiently identify potential treatment targets for further study. We also discuss the limitations of omic analyses and the barriers that must be overcome to maximize the utility of these types of studies. Finally, we address the current state of the field and future opportunities for using multiomics to better personalize heart failure treatment strategies.

Feasibility of preemptive pharmacogenetic testing and improvement of medication treatment satisfaction among medically underserved patients.

Previous findings suggest that medically underserved patients are prescribed medications with pharmacogenetic (PGx) guidelines at a high frequency. Thus, underserved patients may especially benefit from PGx testing, but little evidence exists regarding the effect of testing in this population. This pilot study aimed to generate key feasibility data and explore clinical outcomes of PGx implementation in underserved populations. Black and Latino patients were recruited from an outpatient clinic and underwent PGx testing. Feasibility measures included enrollment metrics and actionable genotype frequencies. The primary clinical outcome was patient medication treatment satisfaction 6 months after testing. Implementation outcomes included the number of healthcare provider encounters and medication changes within the 6-month follow-up. Effectiveness outcomes included medication adherence, patient-perceived test value, and time spent discussing medications with providers. Ninety-nine patients completed the study. Proton-pump inhibitors were the most frequent PGx drug class prescribed at baseline (61%) followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (36%). Patients with an actionable genotype constituted 96% of the population, whereas 28% had an actionable genotype related to their PGx drug. Patient treatment satisfaction significantly increased over the 6 months after PGx testing. In addition, medication adherence and the number of provider encounters significantly increased over the study period. In a pilot study, preemptive PGx testing was feasible in primary care clinics, improved patient treatment satisfaction and adherence, and increased the number of provider encounters in medically underserved patients. Future clinical trials are warranted to assess the long-term effects of PGx testing in a larger diverse patient population.

An Introductory Tutorial on Cardiovascular Pharmacogenetics for Healthcare Providers.

Pharmacogenetics can improve clinical outcomes by reducing adverse drug effects and enhancing therapeutic efficacy for commonly used drugs that treat a wide range of cardiovascular diseases. One of the major barriers to the clinical implementation of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics is limited education on this field for current healthcare providers and students. The abundance of pharmacogenetic literature underscores its promise, but it can also be challenging to learn such a wealth of information. Moreover, current clinical recommendations for cardiovascular pharmacogenetics can be confusing because they are outdated, incomplete, or inconsistent. A myriad of misconceptions about the promise and feasibility of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics among healthcare providers also has halted clinical implementation. Therefore, the main goal of this tutorial is to provide introductory education on the use of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics in clinical practice. The target audience is any healthcare provider (or student) with patients that use or have indications for cardiovascular drugs. This tutorial is organized into the following 6 steps: (1) understand basic concepts in pharmacogenetics; (2) gain foundational knowledge of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics; (3) learn the different organizations that release cardiovascular pharmacogenetic guidelines and recommendations; (4) know the current cardiovascular drugs/drug classes to focus on clinically and the supporting evidence; (5) discuss an example patient case of cardiovascular pharmacogenetics; and (6) develop an appreciation for emerging areas in cardiovascular pharmacogenetics. Ultimately, improved education among healthcare providers on cardiovascular pharmacogenetics will lead to a greater understanding for its potential in improving outcomes for a leading cause of morbidity and mortality.

Patients' Perspectives of Factors That Influence Pharmacogenetic Testing Uptake: Enhancing Patient Counseling and Results Dissemination.

Patient preferences for pharmacogenetic (PGx) counseling, testing and results dissemination are not well-established, especially in medically underserved Black and Latino populations. The aim of this study was to capture the preferences of Black and Latino patients who received PGx testing to ascertain: (1) factors enhancing their willingness to do testing and (2) preferences for the dissemination of results. Using the constant comparative method, we thematically analyzed interviews with 13 patients from medically underserved populations who had undergone PGx testing. The findings describe participants wanting better medication options, receiving a clear explanation about the testing, valuing or having an interest in science or medicine and having misconceptions about testing results as factors affecting one's willingness to undergo PGx testing. Additionally, patients confirmed preferring receiving results of PGx testing in a sharable format and described the significance of discussing results in a clinical appointment. The findings provide insight into what Black and Latino patients may prefer in terms of clinical implementation of PGx testing. These results can be utilized for tailoring future implementation of PGx testing and informing best pre- and post-test patient counseling and education practices.

Genetic polymorphisms in ADRB2 and ADRB1 are associated with differential survival in heart failure patients taking ß-blockers.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with differential beta-blocker (BB) effects on heart rate, blood pressure, and left ventricular ejection fraction in various patient populations. This study aimed to determine if SNPs previously associated with BB response are also associated with differential survival in heart failure (HF) patients receiving BBs. HF patient data were derived from electronic health records and the Social Security Death Index. Associations and interactions between BB dose, SNP genotype, and the outcome of death were assessed using a Cox proportional-hazard model adjusting for covariates known to be associated with differential survival in HF patients. Two SNPs, ADRB1 Arg389Gly and ADRB2 Glu27Gln, displayed significant interactions (Pint = 0.043 and Pint = 0.017, respectively) with BB dose and their association with mortality. Our study suggests that ADRB2 27Glu and ADRB1 389Arg may confer a larger survival benefit with higher BB doses in patients with HF.

Therapeutic Challenges and Emerging Treatment Targets for Pulmonary Hypertension in Left Heart Disease.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) attributable to left heart disease (LHD) is believed to be the most common form of PH and is strongly associated with increased mortality and morbidity in this patient population. Specific therapies for PH-LHD have not yet been identified and the use of pulmonary artery hypertension-targeted therapies in PH-LHD are not recommended. Endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, guanylate cyclase stimulators, and prostacyclins have all been studied in PH-LHD with conflicting results. Understanding the mechanisms underlying PH-LHD could potentially provide novel therapeutic targets. Fibrosis, oxidative stress, and metabolic syndrome have been proposed as pathophysiological components of PH-LHD. Genetic associations have also been identified, offering additional mechanisms with biological plausibility. This review summarizes the evidence and challenges for treatment of PH-LHD and focuses on underlying mechanisms on the horizon that could develop into potential therapeutic targets for this disease.

Beta-Blocker Dose Stratifies Mortality Risk in a Racially Diverse Heart Failure Population.

Heart failure (HF) is highly prevalent and a major cause of death in the United States. The effect of HF medications on survival has been predicted by validated models studied in populations predominantly of European descent. This study aimed to identify medications associated with survival in a racially diverse HF population. Patients with HF were recruited and followed from 2001 to 2015. Data were collected from electronic health records and the Social Security Death Index. The primary analysis tested the association between medication dose and all-cause mortality, with a secondary analysis assessing the composite outcome of death or cardiac-related hospitalization. Circulating concentration of the fibrotic marker procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) was also compared with medication doses in patients with concentrations available. The study population consisted of 337 patients, of which 25.2% died and 46% were hospitalized. Increased beta-blocker (BB) dose was significantly associated with survival in the base model [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, P = 0.017] and marginally associated in the comprehensive model (HR = 0.75, P = 0.068). BB dose was also associated with decreased risk of the composite end point in the base model (HR = 0.80, P = 0.029) and to a lesser extent in the comprehensive model (HR = 0.83, P = 0.085). Furthermore, increased BB dose was inversely associated with circulating PIIINP concentration (P = 0.041). In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of BB dose escalation for survival and decreased hospitalization in patients with HF, regardless of race or HF type. It also suggests that benefits observed with high-dose BBs could be mediated, at least in part, by decreased cardiac fibrosis.

Transcriptome-wide analysis associates ID2 expression with combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients who develop pulmonary hypertension (PH) have an increased risk of death, with combined pre- and post-capillary PH (CpcPH) having the highest risk. However, the mechanism behind PH development in HFpEF is poorly understood. We aimed to identify transcriptomic associations with PH development in HFpEF. Blood was collected from 30 HFpEF patients: 10 without PH, 10 with isolated post-capillary PH, and 10 with CpcPH. Gene expression measurements were completed using transcriptome-wide RNA sequencing. Gene expression differences were compared using a quasi-likelihood method adjusting for age, sex, race, and smoking-status. Biological pathways were compared using global gene expression differences. A replication in 34 additional heart failure patients and a validation in lung tissue from a representative mouse model were completed using quantitative PCR. Six differentially expressed genes were identified when comparing transcriptomics between subjects with CpcPH and those without PH. When tested in additional subjects, only the association with ID2 replicated. Consistent with clinical findings, Id2 expression was also upregulated in mice with HFpEF and PH. Pathway analysis identified proliferative and mitochondrial pathways associated with CpcPH. Thus, these patients may possess systemic pathophysiological differences similar to those observed in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients.

Evaluation of prophylactic dosages of Enoxaparin in non-surgical elderly patients with renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis dosing strategies using enoxaparin in elderly patients with renal disease are limited, while dose adjustments or monitoring of anti-Xa levels are recommended. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin 20 mg versus 30 mg subcutaneously daily by comparing anti-Xa levels, thrombosis and bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-blinded, single-center randomized clinical trial including non-surgical patients, 70 years of age or older, with renal disease requiring thromboprophylaxis. Patients were randomized to receive either 20 mg or 30 mg of enoxaparin. The primary endpoint was peak anti-Xa levels on day 3. Secondary endpoints included trough anti-Xa levels on day 3, achievement of within range prophylactic target peak anti-Xa levels and the occurrence of hemorrhage, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia or hyperkalemia during hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited and sixteen patients were randomized to each arm. Mean peak anti-Xa level was significantly higher in 30 mg arm (n = 13) compared to the 20 mg arm (n = 11) 0.26 ± 0.11, 95%CI (0.18-0.34), versus 0.14 ± 0.09, 95CI (0.08-0.19) UI/ml, respectively; p = 0.004. Mean trough anti-Xa level was higher in 30 mg arm (n = 10) compared to the 20 mg arm (n = 16), 0.06 ± 0.03, 95CI (0.04-0.08) versus 0.03 ± 0.03, 95CI (0.01-0.05) UI/ml, respectively; p = 0.044. Bleeding events reported in the 30 mg arm were one retroperitoneal bleed requiring multiple transfusions, and in the 20 mg arm one hematuria. No thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Peak anti-Xa levels provided by enoxaparin 20 mg were lower than the desired range for thromboprophylaxis in comparison to enoxaparin 30 mg. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03158792 . Registered: May 18, 2017.

Assessment of bleeding in chronic liver disease and coagulopathy using the IMPROVE bleeding criteria.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors utilized the IMPROVE (International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism) bleeding definition to explore the safety profile of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and concurrent coagulopathy (INR ≥1.5). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 193 adult patient admissions with a diagnosis of CLD and INR ≥1.5 not due to therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients were stratified based on their receipt of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis or not during hospitalization. The rates of overall bleeding, defined as the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding; major bleeding; and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, within 14 days of admission were evaluated. Secondary endpoints included the rates of thrombosis and mortality. RESULTS: The composite of overall bleeding occurred in 17.6% of the admissions. More patients in the group not receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis had overall bleeding (18.5% vs 10%), major bleeding (13.3% vs 10%), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (14.5% vs 5%), with overlapping 95% CI. When stratified per pharmacological thromboprophylaxis status, IMPROVE bleeding risk score (BRS) ≥ 7 was associated with higher rates of overall bleeding, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding as compared to IMPROVE BRS <7, whether patients received or did not receive pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The overall incidence of in-hospital mortality among our study population was 15.5%. Receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was markedly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR = 16.58, 95% CI = 4.47-61.45). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the IMPROVE BRS calculated on admission may serve as a guide for omission of thromboprophylaxis in advanced CLD.

The Role of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) in Cardiovascular Homeostasis: A Non-Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has been gaining major attention recently after the emergence of data showing the promising role of these proteins in lipid homeostasis and atherosclerosis process, glucose and blood pressure regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scholar and Scopus databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, in-vitro trials and reviews about the role of PCSK9 in cardiovascular homeostasis. RESULTS: PCSK9 was found to have major impact on lipid homeostasis and inflammatory process through regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptors. Furthermore, inflammation was found to stimulate the expression of PCSK9 in various cells. As for glomerular proteinuria, a positive correlation was determined between PCSK9 levels and the degree of proteinuria. Hypertension, a major cardiovascular risk factor, is likely affected by PCSK9 levels through their role on epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) surface expression. Likewise, some studies show that PCSK9 is associated with higher fasting blood glucose and plasma insulin, demonstrating a potential role of PCSK9 in glucose homeostasis. The role of PCSK9 in cardiovascular homeostasis is one that is still not completely unraveled. CONCLUSION: Studies have clearly shown the implication of PCSK9 in the cardiovascular risk factors: the higher the PCSK9 levels, the higher the risk of atherosclerosis, fasting plasma glucose and insulin resistance. Inhibiting PCSK9 may therefore theoretically prove to present great benefits in diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk.