Effect of respiratory muscle training in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent respiratory disorder characterized by progressive airflow limitation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on key pulmonary function parameters, inspiratory muscle strength and quality of life in patients with stable COPD. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception to June 12, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of RMT on stable COPD were included for meta-analysis. Results: In total, 12 RCTs involving 453 participants were included in the meta-analysis. RMT demonstrated a significant increase in maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax, MD, 95% CI: 14.34, 8.17 to 20.51, P < 0.001) but not on maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax). No significant improvement was observed in 6-Min walk test (6MWT), dyspnea, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity ratio (FVC) and quality of life between RMT and control groups. However, subgroup analysis revealed a significant negative effect of RMT alone on FEV1/FVC (MD, 95% CI: 2.59, -5.11 to -0.06, P = 0.04). When RMT was combined with other interventions, improvements in FEV1/FVC and FEV1 were found, although not statistically significant. Conclusion: RMT can effectively improve maximal inspiratory pressure in stable COPD patients, but the effect is slight in improving lung function, dyspnea and quality of life. It is recommended to combine with other treatment strategies to comprehensively improve the prognosis of COPD patients.

Difference in meal-related esophageal intraluminal impedance change between gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has overlapping symptoms with functional disorders such as functional heart burn. Twenty-four-hour pH with impedance monitoring is useful for differentiation. The intraluminal impedance change with meal in distal esophagus is not investigated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective investigation of clinical files, 24-hour pH with intraluminal impedance monitoring in patients with GERD and functional disorders. The post-reflux swallow induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index as well as the impedance in distal esophagus before the first meal and 30 min and 60 min after the meal were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: A significant decrease of intraluminal impedance in distal esophagus was noted at 30 min (ΔI30min -301.5 [747.5] Ω, p = 0.018) and recovered at 60 min (ΔI60min -194.6 [766.0] Ω, p = 0.126) after meals in GERD patients. On the other hand, there was no significant change of impedance in patients with functional disorders. There were positive correlations between ΔI30min and PSPW index (correlation = 0.232, p = 0.038). Comparing GERD to functional disorders, the best cut-off value for ΔI30min was -212Ω with 74.4% sensitivity and 60.5% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The intraluminal impedance in distal esophagus was lowered after meals in GERD patients other than functional disorders. This impedance change was correlated with PSPW index and could help differentiate GERD from functional disorders.

High Dose of Atorvastatin for the Treatment of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Carotid Artery Stenting.

Statins have been used to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). However, the optimal dose of statins is still under controversy. This study aimed to investigate the optimal dose of atorvastatin for the treatment of CIN after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Seventy-six patients receiving selective CAS were randomized to receive 3 different dose of atorvastatin (low dose, 20 mg, n = 30; intermediate dose, 40 mg, n = 24; high dose, 60 mg, n = 22). Preoperatively and on day 3 postoperatively, the levels of serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatine kinase (CK) were measured. Creatinine clearance (Ccr) and CIN incidence were calculated. In patients treated with high-dose atorvastatin, no significant change was observed in levels of serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine clearance, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after the CAS procedure (P > 0.05). The CIN incidence in the high-dose group (0%) was significantly lower than the low-dose (13.3%) and intermediate (8.3%) groups (P < 0.05). In the high-dose group, levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatine kinase were significantly increased after CAS (P < 0.05). Pretreatment with 40 mg of atorvastatin is both effective and safe in preventing CIN after CAS. Adverse events of the live and heart should be closely monitored during atorvastatin treatment.