Establishment and application of drug utilization evaluation applying the weighted TOPSIS method: A study based on real-world data of tislelizumab.

BACKGROUND: How to comprehensively evaluate the rationality of drug use is a challenging issue. OBJECTIVE: To establish the evaluation index of the effective use of tislelizumab, so as to ensure its higher rationality and normalization in clinical application. METHODS: Based on the indications, drug instructions, and relevant guidelines of the National Basic Medical Insurance Restriction Catalogue, a retrospective analysis and evaluation of 286 cases of using tislelizumab injection in our hospital from January to December 2022 were conducted using the weighted technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. RESULTS: Among the 286 medical records evaluated, the main irrational manifestations were inappropriate indications (90 cases, 31.47%), auxiliary examination and laboratory examination did not meet the minimum requirements of combination chemotherapy drugs (40 cases, 13.99%), the drug course was not standard (39 cases, 13.64%). Among the included cases, 57.34% were reasonable cases (Ci⩾ 0.8), 10.84% were basic reasonable cases (0.6 ⩽Ci< 0.8), and 31.82% were unreasonable cases (Ci< 0.6). CONCLUSION: The TOPSIS method, with its attribute hierarchical model (AHM)-weighted approach, can be employed as the rational assessment technique for the injection of tislelizumab. The clinical application of tislelizumab in our hospital is still insufficient, which needs to be further improved management.

Impact of Thrombolysis Time Metrics When Participating in National Stroke Center Construction Project.

Purpose: Intravenous thrombolysis has emerged as an effective approach to improve the long-term survival and functional status of patients with ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a national stroke project on the door-to-needle-time (DNT). Patients and Methods: The patients were divided into pre-construction and construction periods. Construction Measures were performed during the construction period. The DNT and onset-to-needle time (ONT) were compared in two period groups. Results: After participating in the National Stroke Center Project and effective measurements, the thrombolysis treatment metrics were improved significantly. The DNT (IQR) was shortened from 65.0 (54.5,85.0) minutes in the Pre-Construction period to 40.0 (33.0,53.0) minutes in the Construction period (p < 0.001). Similarly, the ONT was reduced from 157.0 (IQR) (115.0,184.0) minutes to 116.0 (87.8,170.0) minutes (p = 0.035). Conclusion: The DNT time and ONT time can be shortened by National Stroke Center Construction projects. More suitable hospitals should be encouraged to participate as the National Stroke Center.