Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Acute Med ; 13(3): 122-124, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37841824

RESUMO

Idiopathic spontaneous intra-abdominal hemorrhage (ISIH) is a rare condition that can be catastrophic if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Herein, we report a case of ISIH due to suspected hemorrhage of the proximal branch of the superior mesenteric artery, which caused epigastric pain.

2.
Psychooncology ; 31(10): 1728-1736, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35953896

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) are frequently reported among cancer survivors, and attention is the most frequently assessed cognitive domain in CRCI. However, there is no consensus as to whether attention is impaired. We suggest that a major reason for this lack of agreement is a lack of construct validity for neuropsychological attention tests. We propose to assess the construct validity of neuropsychological attention tests with respect to experimental paradigms from cognitive psychology. METHODS: Self-reported cancer survivors (N = 314) completed an online battery comprising six experimental attention paradigms and eight neuropsychological tests. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the fit of five models derived from a general population sample (N = 636) in a previous study (M. Treviño, Cogn Res Princ Implic, in press). We then subjected the best-fitting model to a measurement invariance analysis. RESULTS: The best-fitting model was a six intercorrelated factor structure, comprising Capacity, Search, Digit Span, Arithmetic, Sustained Attention, and Flanker Interference factors. Configural and weak invariance held, indicating that the factor loadings were invariant across groups. Strong invariance, indicating that intercepts were also invariant, held except for the Approximate Number Sense test. CONCLUSIONS: According to our factor model, Spatial Span and Digit Symbol Coding measure attentional capacity, while the Trail Making Test (A&B) and Letter Cancellation tests measure visual search ability. However, Digit Span and Arithmetic tests do not measure attention. We hope that these results will lead to better scientific models, better patient education, and, ultimately, improved outcomes for survivors.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Análise Fatorial , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Psicometria
3.
Cogn Res Princ Implic ; 6(1): 51, 2021 07 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292418

RESUMO

We investigated whether standardized neuropsychological tests and experimental cognitive paradigms measure the same cognitive faculties. Specifically, do neuropsychological tests commonly used to assess attention measure the same construct as attention paradigms used in cognitive psychology and neuroscience? We built on the "general attention factor", comprising several widely used experimental paradigms (Huang et al., 2012). Participants (n = 636) completed an on-line battery (TestMyBrain.org) of six experimental tests [Multiple Object Tracking, Flanker Interference, Visual Working Memory, Approximate Number Sense, Spatial Configuration Visual Search, and Gradual Onset Continuous Performance Task (Grad CPT)] and eight neuropsychological tests [Trail Making Test versions A & B (TMT-A, TMT-B), Digit Symbol Coding, Forward and Backward Digit Span, Letter Cancellation, Spatial Span, and Arithmetic]. Exploratory factor analysis in a subset of 357 participants identified a five-factor structure: (1) attentional capacity (Multiple Object Tracking, Visual Working Memory, Digit Symbol Coding, Spatial Span), (2) search (Visual Search, TMT-A, TMT-B, Letter Cancellation); (3) Digit Span; (4) Arithmetic; and (5) Sustained Attention (GradCPT). Confirmatory analysis in 279 held-out participants showed that this model fit better than competing models. A hierarchical model where a general cognitive factor was imposed above the five specific factors fit as well as the model without the general factor. We conclude that Digit Span and Arithmetic tests should not be classified as attention tests. Digit Symbol Coding and Spatial Span tap attentional capacity, while TMT-A, TMT-B, and Letter Cancellation tap search (or attention-shifting) ability. These five tests can be classified as attention tests.


Assuntos
Atenção , Memória de Curto Prazo , Análise Fatorial , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Teste de Sequência Alfanumérica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...