Spike timing-dependent plasticity alters electrosensory neuron synaptic strength in vitro but does not consistently predict changes in sensory tuning in vivo.

How do sensory systems optimize detection of behaviorally relevant stimuli when the sensory environment is constantly changing? We addressed the role of spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) in driving changes in synaptic strength in a sensory pathway and whether those changes in synaptic strength could alter sensory tuning. It is challenging to precisely control temporal patterns of synaptic activity in vivo and replicate those patterns in vitro in behaviorally relevant ways. This makes it difficult to make connections between STDP-induced changes in synaptic physiology and plasticity in sensory systems. Using the mormyrid species Brevimyrus niger and Brienomyrus brachyistius, which produce electric organ discharges for electrolocation and communication, we can precisely control the timing of synaptic input in vivo and replicate these same temporal patterns of synaptic input in vitro. In central electrosensory neurons in the electric communication pathway, using whole cell intracellular recordings in vitro, we paired presynaptic input with postsynaptic spiking at different delays. Using whole cell intracellular recordings in awake, behaving fish, we paired sensory stimulation with postsynaptic spiking using the same delays. We found that Hebbian STDP predictably alters sensory tuning in vitro and is mediated by NMDA receptors. However, the change in synaptic responses induced by sensory stimulation in vivo did not adhere to the direction predicted by the STDP observed in vitro. Further analysis suggests that this difference is influenced by polysynaptic activity, including inhibitory interneurons. Our findings suggest that STDP rules operating at identified synapses may not drive predictable changes in sensory responses at the circuit level.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We replicated behaviorally relevant temporal patterns of synaptic activity in vitro and used the same patterns during sensory stimulation in vivo. There was a Hebbian spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) pattern in vitro, but sensory responses in vivo did not shift according to STDP predictions. Analysis suggests that this disparity is influenced by differences in polysynaptic activity, including inhibitory interneurons. These results suggest that STDP rules at synapses in vitro do not necessarily apply to circuits in vivo.

Pauses during communication release behavioral habituation through recovery from synaptic depression.

During interactive communication, animals occasionally cease producing communication signals. The behavioral significance of resumed communication signals following a cessation, or silent pause, has been described in human speech: word recognition by listeners is enhanced after silent pauses, and speakers tend to place such pauses prior to words that are contextually unpredictable and that therefore have high information content.1-5 How central nervous systems process signals following pauses differently from signals during continuous communication has not been studied at a cellular level. Here we studied behavioral and neurophysiological impacts of pauses during electric communication in mormyrid fish. We found that isolated fish produced fewer and shorter pauses than fish housed in pairs, and that fish tended to produce burst displays immediately following pauses. In the electrosensory pathway, sensitivity to pauses first arose in the midbrain posterior exterolateral nucleus (ELp): evoked field potentials were enhanced as pause duration increased, with a time constant of ∼1 s. Intracellular recording from single ELp neurons suggested that this increased sensitivity resulted from a pause-associated recovery from synaptic depression that was induced by the preceding stimulation. Behavioral responses were also facilitated by longer pauses, with a similar time constant of ∼1 s. Further, during natural electric communication between pairs of fish, the insertion of artificial pauses resulted in increased signaling by the receiving fish immediately following the pause. Thus, our results suggest that pauses during communication release sensory circuits from synaptic depression, thereby maximizing the physiological and behavioral effects of subsequent communication signals.