Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
1.
Air Med J ; 42(6): 450-455, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996181

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Fatigue is common in emergency medical services (EMS) and is exacerbated in air medical transport. There is no gold standard for recognizing high-risk factors contributing to fatigue. Current survey instruments designed to assess fatigue in EMS have limited evidence supporting their reliability and validity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of a team-based flight risk assessment tool (FRAT) as an instrument to improve safety and patient care for air medical transport. METHODS: The FRAT factors professional experience, stressors, sleepiness, and work conditions at the beginning of each shift and generates a team-based score. The 1,919 FRAT scores from a single air/ground critical care transport program during 2021 were retrospectively analyzed against measurable operational outcomes and indicators of error, including first-pass intubation success, the presence of quality assurance flags on documentation, and the time spent on scene. RESULTS: There were 281 occurrences of a FRAT score that warranted mitigation, and 259 reported mitigation strategies. There were no associations between FRAT score and intubation success, quality assurance flags, and scene time. CONCLUSION: The team-based FRAT score triggered a mitigation activity on 281 occasions in 2021. There were no associations between the FRAT score and specific quality measures examined.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fadiga
2.
Cureus ; 15(9): e44918, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37814741

RESUMO

Background and objective Emergency medical services (EMS) are often assumed to only involve bringing patients to physicians for treatment in the emergency department. However, EMS staff are also responsible for responding to physicians in the primary care setting when medical emergencies arise. While emergency medicine (EM) residents are exposed to EMS as part of their curriculum, little is known about the knowledge of other resident physicians who may interact with EMS. In light of this, we conducted this study to address the scarcity of data related to this topic. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional knowledge assessment was conducted among resident physicians in emergency medicine, internal medicine, family medicine, pediatric, and combined medicine and pediatric residencies at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Results Eighteen EM residents and 26 non-EM residents completed the assessment. The EM residents had a higher average score when compared to non-emergency medicine residents (69.2% vs. 53.8%, p=0.0012). Conclusion Variations in scores between EM and other specialties that interact with EMS highlight the need for further training and familiarization related to EMS for residents in non-EM specialties.

3.
Cureus ; 15(1): e33355, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36751187

RESUMO

Introduction Intraosseous (IO) access is an alternative to peripheral intravenous access, in which a needle is inserted through the cortical bone into the medullary space using either a manual driver or an electric drill. Although studies report high success rates of IO access, failures are often attributed to incorrect site placement due to failure to adhere to anatomical landmarks. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of paramedics to locate the correct anatomic location for IO needle insertion. Methods Participants were paramedics who were recruited at Pennsylvania's annual statewide Emergency Medical Services (EMS) conference. After completing a demographics survey which included information about their training and practice environment, they were asked to identify which IO sites were permitted for IO placement using the EZ IO® drill and to place a sticker at those locations on a human volunteer. A transfer sheet was utilized, and the distance between the participants' sticker and the location as marked by a physician board-certified in both Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services was recorded. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were calculated from the records. Results Of 30 paramedics who participated in the study, 25 (83%) had been in practice for more than five years (range: 1-37 years), 13 (46%) reported running more than 20 calls per week, and 23 (79%) reported that they only or mostly provide 9-1-1 EMS response. Ten (36%) participants were currently certified in PHTLS, and 16 (57%) had previously been PHTLS certified. All participants reported having been trained in IO insertion. Seventeen (57%) reported having utilized an IO ≤10 times in the field, and 13 (43%) reported >10 field IO insertions. When asked to identify appropriate IO insertion sites for the EZ IO drill, 26 paramedics (90%) correctly identified both the proximal humerus and proximal tibia. The average distance from the landmark for the humeral insertion site was 5.06 cm, with a statistically significant difference in the means for those who did and did not rotate the arm internally before identifying the humeral IO insertion site (p < .01). The average distance from the landmark at the tibial insertion site was 4.13 cm. Conclusion Although a high percentage of paramedics were able to verbally identify the correct location for IO placement, fewer were able to locate the insertion site on a human volunteer. Our results suggest a need for hands-on refresher training to maintain competency at IO insertion, as it is a rarely utilized procedure in the field.

4.
Air Med J ; 42(1): 28-35, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36710032

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) and ground emergency medical services (GEMS) crash data in the United States during 1983 to 2020 to compare incidences of total, fatal, and injury crashes. METHODS: HEMS and GEMS total, fatal, and injury crashes during 1983 to 2020 and 1988 to 2020, respectively, were analyzed in this retrospective study. Data were obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Additional data from the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Emergency Medical Services Information System, and prior literature were used for rate calculations. A Poisson regression model was used to determine rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals comparing total, fatal, and injury crash rates from 2016 to 2020. RESULTS: HEMS crash rates decreased since 1983. Total GEMS crashes have increased since 1988. Of the total crashes, 33% (HEMS) and 1% (GEMS) were fatal, and 20% (HEMS) and 31% (GEMS) resulted in injury. During 2016 to 2020, GEMS crash rates were 11.0 times higher than HEMS crash rates (95% confidence interval, 5.2-23.3; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: HEMS has a lower crash probability than GEMS. The availability of data is a limitation of this study. National GEMS transportation data could be useful in studying this topic further.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Aeronaves
5.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(1): 84-89, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34874808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: EMS was recognized as a subspecialty of Emergency Medicine in 2010. Accreditation of EMS fellowship programs started in 2013. Despite increasing numbers of programs and a decade since recognition, little has been written about the characteristics and offerings of these programs. METHODS: A 24-question electronic survey was distributed to US accredited programs in spring 2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety percent (61/68) of programs participated. Most offer two spots, an urban (89%) and/or suburban (62%) experience, with 3-12 faculty (M = 5.9, 95% CI [5.34-6.49]), physician response vehicles (59%), and aeromedical exposure (95%). Many programs train in field amputation (72%), but fewer train in field thoracotomy (49%), prehospital ultrasound (64%) and ECMO cannulation (15%). Disaster planning experience is provided mostly with hospitals (87%) or EMS agencies (85%). Most (72%) mass gathering experiences are marathons or concerts involving 1,000-24,999 participants, but 20 programs (33%) participate in events with >100,000 participants. Special operations training includes tactical (75%), fireground (52%), wilderness (39%), and international EMS (56%), but only 12% offer rotation outside the US. About half (46%) include experience with community paramedicine, and 31% are developing an ET3 program. Nearly all programs (98%) involve fellows in simulation, but only 38% provide instruction in how to teach with simulation. All fellows see patients in the ED, with 75% supervising residents. In 7%, the fellow works under a supervising attending much like a resident. In 2019-20, 28% of programs had at least one unfilled position and 15% went completely unfilled, yet, this was not correlated with any specific program characteristic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some commonality, especially in required experiences, considerable differences exist between programs in how education is delivered. However, none of them correlate with filling or the size of the program. Involvement in unique areas such as ultrasound or community paramedicine was not universal. It is unclear what if any impact these differences have on career preparation and satisfaction. Programs may wish to consider sharing resources to offer future EMS physicians more comprehensive experiences.


Assuntos
Currículo , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Bolsas de Estudo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Acreditação
6.
Cureus ; 14(7): e27013, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35989820

RESUMO

Introduction Tension pneumothorax is an immediate threat to life. Treatment in the prehospital setting is usually achieved by needle thoracostomy (NT). Prehospital personnel are taught to perform NT, frequently in the second intercostal space (ICS) at the mid-clavicular line (MCL). Previous literature has suggested that emergency physicians have difficulty identifying this anatomic location correctly. We hypothesized that paramedics would also have difficulty accurately identifying the proper location for NT. Methods A prospective, observational study was performed to assess paramedic ability to identify the location for treatment with NT. Participants were recruited during a statewide Emergency Medical Services (EMS) conference. Subjects were asked the anatomic site for NT and asked to mark the site on a shirtless male volunteer. The site was copied onto a transparent sheet lined up against predetermined points on the volunteer's chest. It was then compared against the correct location that had been identified using palpation, measuring tape, and ultrasound. Results 29 paramedics participated, with 24 (83%) in practice for more than five years and 23 (79%) doing mostly or all 9-1-1 response. All subjects (100%) reported training in NT, although six (21%) had never performed a NT in the field. Nine paramedics (31%) recognized the second ICS at the MCL as the desired site for NT, with 12 (41%) specifying only the second ICS, 11 (38%) specifying second or third ICS, and six (21%) naming a different location (third, fourth, or fifth ICS). None (0%) of the 29 paramedics identified the exact second ICS MCL on the volunteer. Mean distance from the second ICS MCL was 1.37 cm (interquartile range (IQR): 0.7-1.90) in the medial-lateral direction and 2.43 cm in the superior-inferior direction (IQR: 1.10-3.70). Overall mean distance was 3.12 cm from the correct location (IQR: 1.90-4.50). Most commonly, the identified location was too inferior (93%). Allowing for a 2 cm radius from the correct position, eight (28%) approximated the correct placement. 25 (86%) were within a 5 cm radius. Conclusion In this study, paramedics had difficulty identifying the correct anatomic site for NT. EMS medical directors may need to rethink training or consider alternative techniques.

7.
Cureus ; 14(2): e22446, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35345754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transition of care from Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the Emergency Department (ED) represents an intersection at high risk for error. Minimal research has quantitatively examined data transfer at this point. In Pennsylvania, this handoff consists of a transfer-of-care form (TOC) provided by EMS to ED in addition to a verbal report. A prehospital patient care report (PCR) is later filed by EMS up to 72 hours after concluding care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the congruence between prehospital records provided at handoff and the final PCR found in the patient's medical record. Our hypothesis was that there would be discrepancies between the TOC and final PCR. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing the TOC from a single EMS agency to the final PCR found in the electronic medical record. A convenience sample of 200 patients who received advanced life support transport over a one-month period were included. Metrics to assess the discrepancy between the reports included chief complaint, allergies, medications, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), pulse, respiratory rate (RR), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and prehospital treatment provided. The level of agreement between the two sources was compared using kappa statistics and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of the 200 encounters that met inclusion criteria, 72% had matching chief complaints between the TOC and PCR. Medications matched in 66% and allergies matched in 82%. Up to three BP, pulse, and RR readings were collected; only 30% of the third BP readings were available from the TOC, while 68% were available from the PCR. Comparing the three SBP values on the TOC to respective counterparts on the PCR showed a substantial correlation (all CCC >0.95). Pulse and DBP values had moderate-to-substantial correlation (CCC: 0.93, 0.94, 0.96 and 0.77, 0.92, 0.94 respectively). RR showed inconsistent correlation (CCC: 0.37, 0.84, 0.94). GCS showed a moderate correlation between the two forms (CCC: 0.81). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences between the information transferred to the ED through the TOC compared to what was recorded in the PCR. Further evaluation of the TOC process is needed to improve accuracy.

8.
Cureus ; 13(3): e13933, 2021 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33868864

RESUMO

Introduction Endobronchial intubation is a known complication of endotracheal intubation with significant associated morbidity and a reported incidence of up to 15%. In the out-of-hospital setting, paramedics must rely on bedside techniques to confirm appropriate endotracheal tube (ETT) depth. The present real-world practices of paramedics have not been described in this regard. Methods A multi-point survey was distributed to paramedics within the state of Pennsylvania. Participants were scored on the basis of their use of techniques to confirm ETT depth with the highest sensitivity to exclude endobronchial intubation. Results Four-hundred nine (409) responses from 111 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies were recorded. Participants were found to evaluate endotracheal tube depth via auscultation of bilateral breath sounds (91.7% of participants), visualization of the endotracheal tube as it advances 1-2 cm beyond the vocal cords (82.9%), observation of symmetrical chest rise (80.0%), and by securing the ETT at 21 and 23 cm at the incisors for women and men (18.6%). Experienced paramedics were more likely to use the 21/23 cm rule (p=0.039). Participants did not employ the cumulative use of these techniques (p < 0.001) as per a method that has been previously described to exclude endobronchial intubation with 100% sensitivity. Conclusion These data suggest that paramedics are not presently employing the most sensitive techniques to exclude endobronchial intubation. An educational initiative and protocol update may be beneficial.

9.
Air Med J ; 38(3): 150-153, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122577

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of helicopter hot loading on the time to percutaneous intervention (time-to-PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing interhospital transfer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from 2009 to 2014, looking at all patients who had an STEMI, were transferred from a single non-PCI hospital by helicopter emergency medical services, and who received PCI intervention at the PCI-capable hospital. Differences in loading method, flight details, and patient demographics were analyzed to measure the effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, 134 STEMI patients were transferred. Sixty-four were hot loaded (47.7%), and 70 were cold loaded. Patients who were hot loaded had a median reduction in interhospital transfer and time-to-PCI of 22.3 minutes from 91.0 minutes (interquartile range, 65-117 minutes) by cold load to 69.5 minutes (interquartile range, 47.5-91.5 minutes) by hot load. There was no increase in reported safety-related events during the hot load process. The median length of hospital stay was equivalent for both groups at 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol of helicopter hot loading STEMI patients presenting to a non-PCI hospital significantly reduced the median time of interhospital transfer and time-to-PCI without an increase in reported safety events.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Transferência de Pacientes/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 44(2): 244-251, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28665694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent legislation in Pennsylvania allows police officers to administer naloxone to individuals in an opioid overdose. Pressure has subsequently been placed on police departments to adopt naloxone programs. OBJECTIVE: To survey Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police regarding potential obstacles to officer-administered naloxone, and their overall opinion toward such programs. METHODS: A confidential survey was administered at the Annual Conference for the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association and online over the organization's listserv. Respondents rated their level of concern toward four potential obstacles on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. A fifth question asked the degree to which they agree that the benefits of naloxone programs outweigh the risks. RESULTS: Of 180 attendees, 36 Chiefs of Police responded at the conference and 48 to the online survey. The potential agitation of revived victims was their largest reported concern, with 60% responding either a 4 or 5; this was followed by officers correctly identifying situations to use naloxone (42%), the cost of the medication (38%), and the additional administrative duties of the department (32%). Overall 60% responded they "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" the benefits of naloxone programs outweigh the risks, while 23% responded "Strongly Disagree" or "Disagree." No significant differences were seen when separating participants from rural and urban counties or from counties with high, medium, and low rates of overdose fatalities. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that although a significant subset shows concern for the above obstacles, the majority of Chiefs of Police believe that the benefits of equipping officers with naloxone outweigh the risks.


Assuntos
Atitude , Polícia/psicologia , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Pennsylvania , Polícia/legislação & jurisprudência
12.
West J Emerg Med ; 18(3): 437-445, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28435494

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is critical for successful cardiac arrest outcomes. Mechanical devices may improve CPR quality. We simulated a prehospital cardiac arrest, including patient transport, and compared the performance of the LUCAS™ device, a mechanical chest compression-decompression system, to manual CPR. We hypothesized that because of the movement involved in transporting the patient, LUCAS would provide chest compressions more consistent with high-quality CPR guidelines. METHODS: We performed a crossover-controlled study in which a recording mannequin was placed on the second floor of a building. An emergency medical services (EMS) crew responded, defibrillated, and provided either manual or LUCAS CPR. The team transported the mannequin through hallways and down stairs to an ambulance and drove to the hospital with CPR in progress. Critical events were manually timed while the mannequin recorded data on compressions. RESULTS: Twenty-three EMS providers participated. Median time to defibrillation was not different for LUCAS compared to manual CPR (p=0.97). LUCAS had a lower median number of compressions per minute (112/min vs. 125/min; IQR = 102-128 and 102-126 respectively; p<0.002), which was more consistent with current American Heart Association CPR guidelines, and percent adequate compression rate (71% vs. 40%; IQR = 21-93 and 12-88 respectively; p<0.002). In addition, LUCAS had a higher percent adequate depth (52% vs. 36%; IQR = 25-64 and 29-39 respectively; p<0.007) and lower percent total hands-off time (15% vs. 20%; IQR = 10-22 and 15-27 respectively; p<0.005). LUCAS performed no differently than manual CPR in median compression release depth, percent fully released compressions, median time hands off, or percent correct hand position. CONCLUSION: In our simulation, LUCAS had a higher rate of adequate compressions and decreased total hands-off time as compared to manual CPR. Chest compression quality may be better when using a mechanical device during patient movement in prehospital cardiac arrest patient.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/instrumentação , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/tendências , Auxiliares de Emergência/normas , Manequins , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador/instrumentação , Ambulâncias , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Competência Clínica , Estudos Cross-Over , Desenho de Equipamento/instrumentação , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 21(4): 498-502, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28339308

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A board review question bank was created to assist candidates in their preparation for the 2015 EMS certification examination. We aimed to describe the development of this question bank and evaluate its successes in preparing candidates to obtain EMS subspecialty board certification. METHODS: An online question bank was developed by 13 subject matter experts who participated as item writers, representing eight different EMS fellowship programs. The online question bank consisted of four practice tests, with each of the tests comprised of 100 questions. The number of candidates who participated in and completed the question bank was calculated. The passing rate among candidates who completed the question bank was calculated and compared to the publicly reported statistics for all candidates. The relationship between candidates' performance on the question bank and subspecialty exam pass rates was determined. RESULTS: A total of 252 candidates took at least one practice test and, of those, 225 candidates completed all four 100-question practice tests. The pass rate on the 2015 EMS certification exam was 79% (95%CI 74-85%) among candidates who completed the question bank, which is 12% higher than the overall pass rate (p = 0.003). Candidates' performance on the question bank was positively associated with overall success on the exam (X2 = 75.8, p < 0.0001). Achieving a score of ≥ 70% on the question bank was associated with a higher likelihood of passing the exam (OR = 17.8; 95% CI: 8.0-39.6). CONCLUSION: Completing the question bank program was associated with improved pass rates on the EMS certification exam. Strong performance on the question bank correlated with success on the exam.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolaridade , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
14.
Air Med J ; 35(6): 365-368, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27894561

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the effectiveness of apneic oxygenation in preventing hypoxemia during prehospital rapid sequence intubation (RSI). METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study using a pre-existing database looking at intubation management by a single helicopter emergency medical service between July 2013 and June 2015. Apneic oxygenation using high-flow nasal cannula (15 L/min) was introduced to the standard RSI protocol in July 2014. Severe hypoxemia was defined as an incidence of oxygen saturation less than 90%. We compared patients who received apneic oxygenation during RSI with patients who did not using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were identified from the database; 29 (31.2%) received apneic oxygenation. Nineteen patients had an incidence of severe hypoxemia during RSI (20.43%; 95% confidence interval, 12.77%-30.05%). There was no statistically significant difference between the rate of severe hypoxemia between patients in the apneic oxygenation group versus the control group (17.2% vs. 21.9%, P = .78). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients who received apneic oxygenation did not show a statistically significant difference in severe hypoxemia during RSI.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Apneia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Hipóxia/prevenção & controle , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Oxigenoterapia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/terapia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia
16.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 20(6): 688-694, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27215303

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Some helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) maintain an independent supply of blood for use during transport, although practice is variable and not well described. We aimed to characterize the blood-carrying practices by HEMS programs across the United States. METHODS: Online surveys were sent to the leadership of the 261 HEMS programs nationwide listed in the 2011 Atlas and Database of Air Medical Services (ADAMS) database. We examined blood-carrying practices in aggregate, including typical transport time, proportion of scene transports, and local population density. A GIS (Geographic Information System) and multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of characteristics of local practice on each program's decision to carry blood. RESULTS: A total of 235 (91%) programs responded to the survey, representing 857 of the 929 (92.2%) HEMS rotor wing aircraft nationwide. Fifty-nine (25.3%) programs independently carried blood. A higher proportion of interfacility transports (OR 1.023; 95% CI 1.010-1.036) and decreased local population density (OR 1.006; 95% CI 1.001-1.011) were associated with increased odds of carrying blood. Transport time (OR 1.006; 95% CI 0.991-1.020) and number of transports (OR 1.000; CI 1.000-1.000) were not associated with a program's blood carrying practices. There was no effect of local practices on a program's decision to carry blood (OR 1.002; 95% CI 0.980-1.026). CONCLUSION: There is great variability in the utilization of blood by HEMS programs in the United States. Programs that serve more rural areas and programs with a larger percentage of interfacility transports are more likely to independently carry blood.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves , Tipagem e Reações Cruzadas Sanguíneas , Bases de Dados Factuais , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estados Unidos
17.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 20(5): 657-61, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26954013

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal intubation remains one of the most challenging skills in prehospital care. There is a minimal amount of data on the optimal technique to use when managing the airway of an entrapped patient. We hypothesized that use of a blindly placed device would result in both the shortest time to airway management and highest success rate. METHODS: A difficult airway manikin was placed in a cervical collar and secured upside down in an overturned vehicle. Experienced paramedics and prehospital registered nurses used four different methods to secure the airway: direct laryngoscopy, digital intubation, King LT-D, and CMAC video laryngoscopy. Each participant was given three opportunities to secure the airway using each technique in random order. A study investigator timed each attempt and confirmed successful placement, which was determined upon inflation of the manikin's lungs. Intubation success rates were analyzed using a general estimating equations model to account for repeated measures and a linear mixed effects model for average time. RESULTS: Twenty-two prehospital providers participated in the study. The one-pass success rate for the King LT-D was significantly higher than direct laryngoscopy (OR 0.048, CI 0.006-0.351, p < 0.01) and digital intubation (OR 0.040, CI 0.005-0.297, p < 0.01). However, there was no statistical difference between the one-pass success rate of the King LT-D and CMAC video laryngoscopy (OR 0.302, 95% CI 0.026-3.44, p = 0.33). The one-pass median placement time of the King LT-D (22 seconds, IQR 17-26) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than direct laryngoscopy (60 seconds, IQR 42-75), digital intubation (38 seconds, IQR 26-74), and the CMAC (51 seconds, IQR 43-76). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, while the King LT-D offered the quickest airway placement, success rates were not significantly greater than intubation using the CMAC video laryngoscope. Intubation using direct laryngoscopy and digital intubation were less successful and took more time. Use of a blindly placed device or a video laryngoscope may provide the best avenues for airway management of entrapped patients.


Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Espaços Confinados , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde , Humanos , Laringoscopia/métodos , Manequins
18.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(3): 590-3, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26792238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We attempted to determine the effect of prearrival instructions that included the specific location of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in a public venue on the time to defibrillation in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario using untrained bystanders. METHODS: The study was a randomized controlled trial at an urban shopping mall. Participants were asked to retrieve an AED and come back to defibrillate a mannequin. Only the experimental group received the location of the AED. We measured the percentage of shocks that were delivered in less than 3 minutes from the start of the scenario and also recorded several other time intervals. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants completed the study, with 20 participants in the experimental group. The median time to defibrillation in the experimental group was 2.6 minutes (interquartile range, 2.4-2.8) which was significantly less than the control group's median time of 5.9 minutes (interquartile range, 4.38-7.65). Ninety percent (95% confidence interval, 68.3%-98.8%) of the participants in the experimental group defibrillated within 3 minutes, which was significantly different from the control group (10.5%; 95% confidence interval, 1.3%-33.1%). CONCLUSION: In this study, a prearrival protocol providing participants with the location of the nearest AED in a public building resulted in a significant decrease in the time required to deliver a simulated shock. Further investigations in various types of public settings are needed to confirm the results.


Assuntos
Cardioversão Elétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Comunicação entre Serviços de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Desfibriladores , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manequins , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
19.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 29(6): 729-36, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23714762

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Helicopter transport can allow trauma patients to reach definitive treatment rapidly, but its appropriate utilization for interfacility transfer to a pediatric trauma center (PTC) has not been well evaluated. This study evaluated differences in variables associated with transport type and intervention at a PTC between helicopter and ground transport for interfacility trauma transfers. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated pediatric (<18 years old) trauma patients transferred to a rural PTC over a 5-year period. Records (n = 423) were evaluated for transport type, injuries, mechanism, interventions (eg, operations, transfusions, intubation), and treatment time points. Multiple logistic regression and Cox regression survival analyses were performed to evaluate associations with type of transport and interventions. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients received intervention at the PTC, with no significant difference between transport types. Helicopter transport was associated with transport distance, respiratory rate greater than 30 breaths/min, pedestrian struck by auto, subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, pneumothorax, solid organ injury, and vascular compromise/open fracture. Intervention was associated with epidural hematoma, extremity and pelvic fractures, vascular compromise/open fracture, penetrating neck/trunk injury, and complex laceration. Cox regression at less than 6, less than 4, and less than 2 hours after arrival at the PTC demonstrated similar intervention associations. Helicopter transport also correlated with intervention at these time points. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric trauma patients transferred by helicopter did not require interventions. Epidural hematoma, vascular compromise/open fracture, and penetrating neck/trunk injuries predicted prompt interventions (<2 hours) and may have benefited from helicopter transport. There was a disparity between the perceived need for rapid transport and the need for urgent interventions.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Transporte de Pacientes , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Ambulâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pennsylvania , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Rural , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
20.
Simul Healthc ; 8(4): 229-33, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23508095

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study simulated intubation with direct laryngoscopy and with a GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscope using a standard Laerdal airway manikin in a medical helicopter under various conditions. We hypothesized that the intubation times would be greater using direct laryngoscopy compared with the GlideScope under all conditions. METHODS: Twenty crew members of a single helicopter emergency medical service participated in the study. Participants intubated an airway manikin using both direct laryngoscopy and the GlideScope Ranger in varying conditions, including standing in a room with the lights on and off, in the helicopter while stationary on the ground and unbelted during both daytime and nighttime, and finally in the aircraft while in flight belted during both daytime and nighttime. A study investigator recorded the intubation times and independently confirmed tracheal placement of the endotracheal tube. RESULTS: For all 6 environments, the mean time for intubation was slightly greater using the GlideScope (18.7 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 17.4-20.0 seconds) compared with direct laryngoscopy (15.5 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 14.7-16.4). There was a statistically significant difference in times to intubation, in favor of direct laryngoscopy, in the settings of standing with the room lights on (P = 0.0013), on the ground in the helicopter unbelted during the daytime (P = 0.009), and in flight belted at nighttime (P = 0.0012), with the 3 other environments not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Using the GlideScope took more time to intubate compared with direct laryngoscopy in all tested environments. Although this difference in intubation times was statistically significant, it was not clinically significant, suggesting that both modalities may be comparable in nondifficult airways.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Competência Clínica , Laringoscopia/métodos , Manequins , Cirurgia Vídeoassistida/métodos , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...