A classical case report of constrictive pericarditis, highlighting the role of magnetic resonance imaging and haemodynamic assessment.

Background: Constrictive pericarditis is a rare complication of pericarditis and is difficult to diagnose due to non-specific presentation. It mostly presents with right-sided heart failure as a consequence of a rigid pericardium that encases the heart causing impaired diastolic filling. Case summary: We present the case of a patient with signs and symptoms of dyspnoea and right-sided heart failure who was initially diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but remained symptomatic despite being euvolaemic after treatment. A septal bounce and shudder on echocardiogram prompted further investigation. Eventually, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and invasive biventricular pressure measurements led to the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. A pericardiectomy was performed after which the patient was relieved of symptoms. Discussion: Constrictive pericarditis can mimic HFpEF. Due to its potentially curable character, timely recognition is of cardinal importance. In patients with symptoms of severe right-sided heart failure not resolving after diuretic therapy, a septal shudder on echocardiography should trigger further investigation, with e.g. CMR and cardiac catheterization.

Chronic care for heart failure patients: Who to refer back to the general practitioner?-Experiences of the Dutch integrated heart failure care model.

OBJECTIVE: The number of patients with heart failure (HF) and corresponding burden of the healthcare system will increase significantly. The Dutch integrated model, 'Transmural care of HF Patients' was based on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines and initiated to manage the increasing prevalence of HF patients in primary and secondary care and stimulate integrated care. It is unknown how many HF patients are eligible for back-referral to general practitioners (GPs), which is important information for the management of chronic HF care. This study aims to evaluate clinical practice of patients for whom chronic HF care can be referred from the cardiologist to the GP based on the aforementioned chronic HF care model. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective case record-based study was conducted, which included all chronic HF patients registered in the cardiology information systems of two different hospitals. Subsequently, 200 patients were randomly selected for evaluation. The following patients were considered eligible for referral to the GP: 1/Stable HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 2/Stable HF patients with a recovered LVEF and 3/Stable HF patients with a preserved LVEF, 4/HF, palliative setting. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, 17% was considered eligible for referral to the GP. This group consisted of 5% patients with a reduced LVEF, 10.5% patients with recovered LVEF and 1.5% patients with a preserved LVEF. Main indicators for HF care by cardiologists were active cardiac disease other than HF (39.5%), recent admission for HF (29.5%) or a recent adjustment in HF medication (7.5%). CONCLUSION: Applying the chronic HF care model of the 'Transmural care of HF patients' and the ESC-guidelines, results in an important opportunity to further optimise HF integrated care and to deal with the increasing number of HF patients referred to the hospital.

Effectiveness of the European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association website 'heartfailurematters.org' and an e-health adjusted care pathway in patients with stable heart failure: results of the 'e-Vita HF' randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficient incorporation of e-health in patients with heart failure (HF) may enhance health care efficiency and patient empowerment. We aimed to assess the effect on self-care of (i) the European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association website 'heartfailurematters.org' on top of usual care, and (ii) an e-health adjusted care pathway leaving out 'in person' routine HF nurse consultations in stable HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a three-group parallel-randomized trial in stable HF patients from nine Dutch outpatient clinics, we compared two interventions ( heartfailurematters.org website and an e-health adjusted care pathway) to usual care. The primary outcome was self-care measured with the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. Secondary outcomes were health status, mortality, and hospitalizations. In total, 450 patients were included. The mean age was 66.8 ± 11.0 years, 74.2% were male, and 78.8% classified themselves as New York Heart Association I or II at baseline. After 3 months of follow-up, the mean score on the self-care scale was significantly higher in the groups using the website and the adjusted care pathway compared to usual care (73.5 vs. 70.8, 95% confidence interval 0.6-6.2; and 78.2 vs. 70.8, 95% confidence interval 3.8- 9.4, respectively). The effect attenuated, until no differences after 1 year between the groups. Quality of life showed a similar pattern. Other secondary outcomes did not clearly differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the heartfailurematters.org website and an e-health adjusted care pathway improved self-care in HF patients on the short term, but not on the long term. Continuous updating of e-health facilities could be helpful to sustain effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01755988.

Exercise-resembling effects of periodic somatosensory stimulation in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the beneficial effects of exercise training on autonomic derangement and neurohumoral activation in chronic heart failure (CHF) is largely unexplained. In our here-presented hypothesis-generating study we propose that part of these effects is mediated by the exercise-accompanying somatosensory nerve traffic. To demonstrate this, we compared the effects of periodic electrical somatosensory stimulation in patients with CHF with the effects of exercise training and with usual care. METHODS: In a randomized controlled study we measured, in CHF patients, changes in blood pressure, baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), neurohormones, exercise capacity and quality of life (QOL) in response to periodic somatosensory stimulation in the form of 2 Hz transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at both feet, in response to conventional exercise training (EXTR) and, as control (CTRL), in patients with usual care only. RESULTS: Group sizes were N=31 (TENS group), N=25 (EXTR group) and N=30 (CTRL group), respectively. Practically all improvements in BRS, neurohormone concentrations, exercise capacity and QOL in the TENS group were comparable to, or sometimes even better than in the EXTR group. These improvements were not observed in the CTRL group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that periodic electrical somatosensory stimulation is as effective as exercise training in improving BRS, neurohormone concentrations, exercise capacity and QOL in CHF patients. These results encourage exploration of exercise modalities that concentrate on rhythm rather than on effort, with the purpose to normalize autonomic derangement and neurohumoral activation in CHF.

Rehabilitation: Periodic somatosensory stimulation increases arterial baroreflex sensitivity in chronic heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: One of the beneficial effects of exercise training in chronic heart failure (CHF) is an improvement in baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), a prognostic index in CHF. In our hypothesis-generating study we propose that at least part of this effect is mediated by neural afferent information, and more specifically, by exercise-induced somatosensory nerve traffic. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of periodic electrical somatosensory stimulation on BRS in patients with CHF with the effects of exercise training and with usual care. METHODS: We compared in stable CHF patients the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS, N = 23, LVEF 30 ± 9%) with the effects of bicycle exercise training (EXTR, N = 20, LVEF 32 ± 7%). To mimic exercise-associated somatosensory ergoreceptor stimulation, we applied periodic (2/s, marching pace) burst TENS to both feet. TENS and EXTR sessions were held during two successive days. RESULTS: BRS, measured prior to the first intervention session and one day after the second intervention session, increased by 28% from 3.07 ± 2.06 to 4.24 ± 2.61 ms/mmHg in the TENS group, but did not change in the EXTR group (baseline: 3.37 ± 2.53 ms/mmHg; effect: 3.26 ± 2.54 ms/mmHg) (P(TENS vs EXTR) = 0.02). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure did not change in either group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that periodic somatosensory input alone is sufficient and efficient in increasing BRS in CHF patients. This concept constitutes a basis for studies towards more effective exercise training regimens in the diseased/impaired, in whom training aimed at BRS improvement should possibly focus more on the somatosensory aspect.

Effectiveness of beta-blocker therapy in daily practice patients with advanced chronic heart failure; is there an effect-modification by age?

AIMS: The effects of beta-blockers in daily practice patients with advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fraction (EF) are not well established. We aimed to assess, first, the association between beta-blocker prescription at discharge and mortality in a cohort of patients with advanced CHF, and second, whether this association is modified by the age of the patient. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with advanced CHF (n = 625) were prospectively followed after discharge from the Cardiology Department. The mean age was 76 years, 53% male, mean EF 42 +/- 16%. Overall, 308 (49%) patients had a beta-blocker prescribed at discharge, 140 (22%) low-dose and 168 (27%) high-dose therapy. We used multivariate Cox analysis to assess the association between beta-blocker use at discharge and mortality. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 22 months, 117 (27%) patients died. Prescription of a beta-blocker was associated with a 45% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.39, 0.78). The relative risk reduction was similar with low and high doses of beta-blockers (42% and 49%). However, the relative risk reduction was higher in younger than in older patients (P = 0.006). In patients < or = 75 years old prescription of a beta-blocker was associated with 71% risk reduction, whereas in patients >75 years old it was associated with 21% risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In this daily practice cohort of patients with advanced CHF, prescription of a beta-blocker was associated with significant mortality reduction. However, the beneficial effects of beta-blockers appear to be greater in younger patients.

Prescription of beta-blockers in patients with advanced heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Clinical implications and survival.

BACKGROUND: The effects of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are not well established. AIMS: To assess the association between beta-blocker prescription at discharge and mortality in a cohort of patients with advanced HF and preserved LVEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied a cohort of 443 patients with advanced HF and preserved LVEF (LVEF> or =40%). Mean age was 78 years, 56% female, 33% NYHA class IV. Overall, 227 patients (51%) had a beta-blocker prescribed at discharge. Mean duration of follow-up was 25 (+/-18) months. Death (all cause) occurred in 40 patients (17.6%) who were receiving a beta-blocker at discharge and 73 patients (33.8%) who were not on a beta-blocker. In multivariate Cox analysis, including adjustment for propensity score, prescription of a beta-blocker remained associated with a 43% relative mortality risk reduction (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.88, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with advanced HF and preserved LVEF, prescription of a beta-blocker was associated with a significant mortality reduction. This beneficial effect of beta-blocker use needs to be further confirmed in prospective, randomised clinical trials.