Thermoregulatory, behavioral and productive responses of laying hens supplemented with different types and dosages of phytases raised in a hot environment: An integrative approach.

This study had the following objectives: (i) to evaluate the thermoregulatory and behavioral responses of light laying hens supplemented with different types and dosages of phytases in the two day shifts; and (ii) to integrate the thermoregulatory and behavioral responses with performance of these birds raised in a hot environment. 270 light laying hens of the Hy-Line White lineage, with a body weight of 1.60 ± 0.092 kg were distributed in a completely randomized design in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial model with two types of phytases (bacterial and fungal) and two dosages (450 and 900 FTU), and a control diet. The day shift (morning and afternoon) was considered as a fixed effect in the factorial arrangement. Principal component analysis (PCA), correspondence analysis (CA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) were used. There was no interaction (P > 0.05) between phytases and dosages for thermoregulatory responses. Respiratory rate (RR), cloacal temperature (CT), and surface temperature with feathers (STWF) and featherless (STF) were higher (P < 0.001) in the afternoon. Birds show different thermoregulatory and behavioral responses in the two shifts of the day. We also observed that birds supplemented with bacterial and fungal phytase showed similar thermoregulatory and behavioral responses to the control group in both day shifts. Expression of the "eating" activity was greater in the morning, while the birds remained sitting longer in the afternoon. Egg production was higher (P < 0.001) in birds supplemented with bacterial phytase. The phytase dosages had no effect on thermoregulatory, behavioral or performance responses. Egg production, feed conversion per dozen eggs corresponded to 81.1% of the differences between bacterial and fungal phytase supplementation and group control. Thus, we conclude that: (i) phytase dietary supplementation has no effect on the thermoregulatory responses of laying hens reared in a hot environment; (ii) birds supplemented with bacterial phytase showed higher egg production; and (iii) phytases (450 and 900 FTU) do not interfere with productive, behavioral and thermoregulatory responses.

Does dietary supplementation with phytases affect the thermoregulatory and behavioral responses of pullets in a tropical environment?

Dietary supplementation of two types of phytases (fungal and bacterial) with different dosages (300 and 900 FTUs) was evaluated in the thermoregulatory and behavioral responses of replacement pullets in a tropical environment. 288 Hy-Line White laying birds with a mean weight of 639.60 ± 6.05 g, clinically healthy, and eight weeks old were used in the study. Respiratory rate (RR, breaths. min-1), Cloacal temperature (CT, °C), Surface temperature with feathers (STWF, °C), and Surface temperature featherless (STF, °C) were measured in the morning and afternoon. Behavioral data were observed through the following activities: sitting, eating, drinking, exploring feathers (EF), non-aggressive pecking (NAP), and object pecking (OP) recorded every 10 min from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. Environmental variables were measured along with thermoregulatory and behavioral responses. There was an interaction for RR between phytase and period of the day (P < 0.05). The lowest RR (morning) was observed in fungal phytase. STF and STWF were higher (P < 0.05) in the afternoon. Birds supplemented with fungal phytase showed lower STWF (P < 0.05). The variables that contributed to explain physiological and behavioral responses are shown in order of importance for (i) periods of day: morning (sitting, STWF, drinking, eating, and CT) and afternoon (STF, STWF, OP, drinking, eating, RR and sitting); (ii) phytases: fungal (STF, STWF, RR, sitting, eating and drinking); and bacterial (RR, STF, STWF, CT and sitting). Thermoregulatory and behavioral responses were similar between dosages, but different between types of phytases. Birds supplemented with fungal phytase used sensible heat dissipation mechanisms and exhibited thermal comfort behaviors. The 300 and 900 FTUs phytase doses did not influence the thermoregulatory and behavioral responses of birds, while they showed natural heat dissipation and heat stress behaviors in the afternoon. We recommend a dietary supplementation of 300 FTUs fungal phytases.