A Structured Nursing Intervention to Address Oral Chemotherapy Adherence in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a nurse-led intervention to enhance medication knowledge and adherence using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer Oral Agent Teaching Tool (MOATT). DESIGN: Longitudinal, descriptive feasibility study. SETTING: An ambulatory thoracic oncology disease center located at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA. SAMPLE: 30 adult patients with lung cancer who received the oral agent erlotinib. METHODS: Structured, nurse-led education sessions using the MOATT were provided, with a 72-hour follow-up telephone contact. Participants completed a Knowledge Rating Scale (KRS) and adapted Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) at the end of the first cycle of oral chemotherapy. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Knowledge and adherence; feasibility. FINDINGS: Twenty-seven participants completed the study outcome measures reporting high knowledge levels and MMAS-8 scores. Structured, nurse-led education and follow-up monitoring sessions ranged from 14-30 minutes. Several participants also initiated contact for assistance with prescription procurement and symptom management. Participants reported a median of two side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The structured, nurse-led teaching, using the MOATT tool, and follow-up nurse contacts were feasible as integrated into the thoracic oncology setting. Adherence and knowledge outcomes were encouraging. Additional studies should include objective adherence measures and strategies for delivering supportive care to patients at home. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Structured teaching with patients is important to enhance proper oral anticancer medication knowledge and adherence, including follow-up monitoring of administration and side effects at 72 hours.

A phase I trial of high dose gefitinib for patients with leptomeningeal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: There are few effective treatment options for leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the feasibility of high-dose gefitinib in patients with LM from NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations or prior systemic response to EGFR-TKI. METHODS: This phase I open-label trial of a novel gefitinib dosing schedule employed a 3+3 design. Eligible NSCLC patients with LM had known EGFR mutations and/or prior response to EGFR-TKI. Patients alternated 2 weeks of high-dose daily gefitinib (dose levels: 750 mg, 1000 mg, 1250 mg) with 2 weeks of maintenance therapy (500 mg daily). Primary endpoints were safety and toxicity. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), neurological progression-free survival, radiological response, and cytological response in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). RESULTS: Seven patients were treated: 3 at 750 mg dose level, 4 at 1000 mg dose level. There were no DLTs at the 750 mg dose level, and one DLT (toxic epidermal necrolysis) at the 1000 mg dose level. The study was closed due to slow accrual. Median neurological PFS was 2.3 months (range 1.6-4.0 months); median OS was 3.5 months (range 1.6-5.1 months). Though there were no radiologically documented remissions of LM disease, four patients had improvement in neurological symptoms. One patient cleared their CSF of NSCLC cells, while 2 others had decrease in malignant cells in CSF. CONCLUSION: Although the MTD was not defined due to slow accrual, this study provides important information about the tolerability and CSF penetration of high-dose gefitinib as a therapeutic option for modest palliation for NSCLC patients with LM and a known EGFR mutation.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had previously received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. These agents have activity in non-small cell lung cancer, but their role in mesothelioma is unclear. The primary endpoint is response rate. Secondary endpoints include time to progression, survival, and toxicity. METHODS: Eligible patients with mesothelioma who had previously received 1 chemotherapy regimen were treated with erlotinib 150 mg per os daily and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg administered intravenously on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression or development of significant toxicity. Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles using previously established mesothelioma response criteria from Byrne and Nowak. RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible patients initiated therapy with erlotinib and bevacizumab between February 2004 and October 2006. There were no complete or partial responses, although 12 patients achieved stable disease for at least 2 cycles of treatment. The median time to progression was 2.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 months-5.9 months). The median survival was 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.8 months-10.1 months). The most common toxicities were rash and diarrhea. There were no treatment-related deaths, intracranial bleeding, or hemoptysis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab was tolerated reasonably well, but there was no evidence of radiographic response. This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting trials in mesothelioma patients who have failed first-line therapy. More therapeutic studies with effective agents are needed for these patients.

Phase II clinical trial of chemotherapy-naive patients > or = 70 years of age treated with erlotinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This is a phase II, multicenter, open-label study of chemotherapy-naïve patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and age > or = 70 years who were treated with erlotinib and evaluated to determine the median, 1-year, and 2-year survival. The secondary end points include radiographic response rate, time to progression (TTP), toxicity, and symptom improvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with NSCLC were treated with erlotinib 150 mg/d until disease progression or significant toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks by computed tomography scan using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Tumor samples were analyzed for the presence of somatic mutations in EGFR and KRAS. RESULTS: Eighty eligible patients initiated erlotinib therapy between March 2003 and May 2005. There were eight partial responses (10%), and an additional 33 patients (41%) had stable disease for 2 months or longer. The median TTP was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.0 to 5.5 months). The median survival time was 10.9 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 14.6 months). The 1- and 2- year survival rates were 46% and 19%, respectively. The most common toxicities were acneiform rash (79%) and diarrhea (69%). Four patients developed interstitial lung disease of grade 3 or higher, with one treatment-related death. EGFR mutations were detected in nine of 43 patients studied. The presence of an EGFR mutation was strongly correlated with disease control, prolonged TTP, and survival. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib monotherapy is active and relatively well tolerated in chemotherapy-naïve elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Erlotinib merits consideration for further investigation as a first-line therapeutic option in elderly patients.

Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib (ZD1839, "Iressa") on an expanded access study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib (ZD1839 or Iressa; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE), in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This was an open label, expanded access program (EAP) of oral gefitinib administered at 250 mg per day continuously until evidence of undue toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: Two hundred consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 0-6). One hundred seventy-two patients were treated with gefitinib; 23 expired from disease progression prior to treatment and 5 withdrew their consent. One hundred fifty-four patients are evaluable for toxicity; 8 (5.2%) experienced grade 3/4 toxicity; 2 patients discontinued therapy for grade 3 rash and one for grade 3 nausea. Of 172 patients evaluable for efficacy, 7 (4.1%; 95% CI; 1.7-8.2%) experienced a partial response (PR); 60 patients (34.9%) had stable disease (SD) as their best response. Median survival for all patients was 4.5 months (95% CI; 4.1-4.9 months). One-year survival was 29%. Significant independent prognostic factors associated with improved survival were female gender, good performance status (0/1), and adenocarcinoma histology. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib has anti-tumor activity, in a heterogeneous population of NSCLC patients treated on the EAP study. Treatment with gefitinib in this population is associated with a longer survival in women, those with good performance status and in patients with adenocarcinomas. These findings need to be further validated in additional clinical studies.

Induction docetaxel and carboplatin followed by weekly docetaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiotherapy, then surgery in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel (DOC) in combination with carboplatin (CAR) and thoracic radiotherapy (RT), in the setting of trimodality treatment of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-two patients with biopsy-proven stage IIIA (n = 20) or IIIB (n = 12) NSCLC were given two initial cycles of CAR (area under the curve = 6) and DOC (75 mg/m(2)), subsequent RT (54 Gy) with concurrent weekly CAR (area under the curve = 2), and DOC at six dose levels from 10 to 40 mg/m(2), then surgery if the patient's disease was resectable. RESULTS: Three patients did not complete induction computed tomography (CT). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent CT/RT. Fifteen patients were eligible for surgery. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2 patients, at dose levels two (atrial fibrillation) and three (transaminitis). The maximum-tolerated dose, as defined by the protocol, was not reached, although grade 3 and 4 toxicities were encountered at all dose levels. The most common more than or equal to grades 3 toxicities were neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Four patients (13.3%) responded to induction CT. Ten patients (38.5%) responded to CT/RT. Eight surgical patients (57.1%) were downstaged, including 3 pathologic complete responses. Median relapse free and overall survivals are 8.5 and 12 months. One-year and estimated 2-year survival rates are 56.3 and 34.3%. CONCLUSION: This new regimen for stage III NSCLC of induction CAR/DOC, then weekly CAR/DOC with concurrent RT followed by surgery, can be safely administered and offers encouraging results. DOC at 30 mg/m(2) in combination with CAR and RT is recommended for Phase II study.

Vaccination with irradiated autologous tumor cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor augments antitumor immunity in some patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We demonstrated that vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting antitumor immunity in multiple murine models and patients with metastatic melanoma. To test whether this vaccination strategy enhances antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase I clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resected metastases were processed to single-cell suspension, infected with a replication-defective adenoviral vector encoding GM-CSF, irradiated, and cryopreserved. Individual vaccines consisted of 1 x 10(6), 4 x 10(6), or 1 x 10(7) cells, depending on overall yield, and were administered intradermally and subcutaneously at weekly and biweekly intervals. RESULTS: Vaccines were successfully manufactured for 34 (97%) of 35 patients. The average GM-CSF secretion was 513 ng/10(6) cells/24 h. Toxicities were restricted to grade 1 to 2 local skin reactions. Nine patients were withdrawn early because of rapid disease progression. Vaccination elicited dendritic cell, macrophage, granulocyte, and lymphocyte infiltrates in 18 of 25 assessable patients. Immunization stimulated the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to irradiated, dissociated, autologous, nontransfected tumor cells in 18 of 22 patients. Metastatic lesions resected after vaccination showed T lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltrates with tumor necrosis in three of six patients. Two patients surgically rendered as having no evidence of disease at enrollment remain free of disease at 43 and 42 months. Five patients showed stable disease durations of 33, 19, 12, 10, and 3 months. One mixed response was observed. CONCLUSION: Vaccination with irradiated autologous NSCLC cells engineered to secrete GM-CSF enhances antitumor immunity in some patients with metastatic NSCLC.