Cardiovascular neural regulation is impaired in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. A study by spectral and complexity analysis of cardiovascular oscillations.

Although the clinical hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive motor weakness, different combinations of autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction have been described. No clear correlation between ANS abnormalities and ALS clinical characteristics has been found so far. We investigated the cardiovascular neural regulation in ALS with a non-invasive methodology, using spectral and complexity analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) variability. In all patients, we found low RR variance and an altered response to orthostasis, witnessed by the indices derived from both spectral and complexity analysis of HRV and SAP variability. Besides, we identified two groups with distinct autonomic profiles at rest, those with higher, and those with lower cardiac sympathetic activity. In both groups the cardiovascular response to tilting was impaired. Our study outlined that ANS is invariably impaired in ALS, and patients can present with different baseline patterns. Our findings suggest important pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights. The presence of different autonomic profiles at rest supports the new concept of ALS as a multisystem disorder with phenotypic heterogeneity. Our results are also relevant in clinical practice. They can help to improve patients' management, and to identify prognostic factors.

An easy intervention to improve short-term adherence to medications in community-dwelling older outpatients. A pilot non-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Complex interventions to improve compliance to pharmacological treatment in older people have given mixed results and are not easily applicable in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to test the short-term efficacy on self-reported medication adherence of an easy intervention in which the patient or caregiver was asked to transcribe the pharmacological treatment while it was dictated to him/her by the doctor. METHODS: Pilot non-randomised controlled trial involving 108 community-dwelling outpatients aged 65+ (54 in the intervention arm, 54 controls) referred to a geriatric service from May to July 2009 and prescribed by the geriatrician a change in therapy. The intervention was applied at the end of the visit to the person managing the medications, be it the elder or his/her caregiver. Outcome of the study was the occurrence of any adherence error, assessed at a one-month follow-up by means of a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: The socio-demographic, functional and clinical characteristics of the two compared groups were similar at baseline. At a one-month follow-up 43 subjects (40%) had made at least one adherence error, whether unintentional or intentional. In the intervention group the prevalence of adherence errors was lower than in controls (20% vs 59%; adjusted odds ratio 0.16, 95% confidence interval 0.07 - 0.39; p < 0.001) after adjusting for the person managing the medications, the adherence errors at baseline and for the number of prescribed drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In an older outpatient population the intervention considered was effective in reducing the prevalence of adherence errors in the month following the visit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12611000347965.