Phytochrome and retrograde signalling pathways converge to antagonistically regulate a light-induced transcriptional network.

Plastid-to-nucleus retrograde signals emitted by dysfunctional chloroplasts impact photomorphogenic development, but the molecular link between retrograde- and photosensory-receptor signalling has remained unclear. Here, we show that the phytochrome and retrograde signalling (RS) pathways converge antagonistically to regulate the expression of the nuclear-encoded transcription factor GLK1, a key regulator of a light-induced transcriptional network central to photomorphogenesis. GLK1 gene transcription is directly repressed by PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF)-class bHLH transcription factors in darkness, but light-activated phytochrome reverses this activity, thereby inducing expression. Conversely, we show that retrograde signals repress this induction by a mechanism independent of PIF mediation. Collectively, our data indicate that light at moderate levels acts through the plant's nuclear-localized sensory-photoreceptor system to induce appropriate photomorphogenic development, but at excessive levels, sensed through the separate plastid-localized RS system, acts to suppress such development, thus providing a mechanism for protection against photo-oxidative damage by minimizing the tissue exposure to deleterious radiation.

The fuc1 gene product (20 kDa FUC1) of Pisum sativum has no alpha-L-fucosidase activity.

An alpha-L-fucosidase purified from pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska) epicotyl was previously described as a cell wall enzyme of 20 kDa that hydrolyses terminal alpha-L-fucosidic linkages from oligosaccharide fragments of xyloglucan. cDNA and genomic copies were further isolated and sequenced. The predicted product of the cDNA and the genomic clone (fuc1), was a 20 kDa protein containing a signal peptide and five cysteines. This was the first alpha-L-fucosidase gene to be cloned in plants but its fucosidase activity has not been demonstrated. Here, our biochemical and immuno analyses suggest that fuc1 does not encode an alpha-L-fucosidase. Pea fuc1 expressed in Escherichia coli, insect cells and Arabidopsis thaliana produced recombinant proteins without alpha-L-fucosidase activity. Pea plants had endogenous alpha-L-fucosidase activity, but the enzyme was not recognised by an antibody produced against recombinant FUC1 protein expressed in E. coli. In contrast, the antibody immunoprecipitated a 20 kDa protein which was inactive. By chromatographic analysis of pea protein extracts, we separated alpha-L-fucosidase-active fractions from the 20 kDa protein fractions. We conclude that the alpha-L-fucosidase activity is not attributable to the 20 kDa FUC1 protein. A new function for fuc1 gene product, now named PIP20 (for protease inhibitor from pea) is proposed.