Impact of pre-existent vascular and poly-vascular disease on acute myocardial infarction management and outcomes: An analysis of 2 million patients from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pre-existing vascular disease are known to have worse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is limited data for outcomes stratified by type and number of vascular territories involved. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2015-2017), we examined outcomes of AMI in patients with pre-existent vascular disease stratified by number as well as types of diseased beds including all five major vascular sites: cardiac, cerebrovascular, renal, aortic and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of adverse outcomes and invasive procedure utilization. RESULTS: Out of 2,184,614 AMI admissions, 49.7% had pre-existent vascular disease. The odds of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), mortality, ischemic stroke and major bleeding incrementally increased and was highest in those with ≥3 vascular sites involved (aOR for MACCE 1.16, CI 1.13-1.19; mortality 1.3, CI 1.26-1.34; stroke 1.15, CI 1.1-1.2; major bleeding 1.21, CI 1.16-1.25). Amongst those with a single pre-existent diseased vascular bed, the adjusted odds of MACCE appeared to be higher in those with PVD (1.28, CI 1.26-1.31), aortic disease (1.24, CI 1.19-1.29), and cerebrovascular disease (1.22, CI 1.2-1.25). Patients with pre-existent vascular disease had a lower overall likelihood of undergoing invasive revascularization procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the population presenting with AMI have pre-existent vascular disease. There is an incremental increase in adverse outcomes with increasing number of diseased vascular beds, with further differences in outcomes and utilization of invasive procedures based on sub-types of sites involved.

Applicability and procedural success rate of bioresorbable -vascular scaffolds for percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comer cohort of 383 consecutive patients.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine applicability and procedural success of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comer cohort. Background BVS use in bifurcations and severely calcified lesions is not recommended, and a relatively large crossing profile may cause limitations. It is has never been studied how widely BVS can be applied in all-comer cohorts. Methods In 383 consecutive patients (acute coronary syndrome: 124, stable coronary disease 259), a BVS (Absorb) was used as first-line device unless any of the following contraindications were present: bifurcation with side branch >2.0 mm, reference diameter <2.5 mm or >4.0 mm, required device length <12 mm, in-stent stenosis, or contraindications to 6 months of DAPT. Patients and lesions were evaluated regarding suitability for BVS treatment, procedural success (successful BVS placement and residual stenosis <30%), and outcome. Results Of 588 lesions, 303 (52%) were unsuitable for BVS placement due to presence of a bifurcation (30% of unsuitable lesions), reference -diameter >4.0 mm (13%) or <2.5 mm (12%), contraindication to 6 months DAPT (13%), in-stent stenosis (14%), and desired device length <12 mm (4%). If BVS use was attempted, procedural success with a scaffold was 95% (271/285). Crossing failure occurred in 14 cases (5%), affected lesions were significantly more calcified. After a mean follow-up period of 259 days, definite/probable scaffold thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of patients. Conclusions Approximately one-half of lesions in an all-comer population can successfully be treated with BVS. Crossing failure is rare.

Drug eluting balloons as stand alone procedure for coronary bifurcational lesions: results of the randomized multicenter PEPCAD-BIF trial.

OBJECTIVES: We set out to investigate the benefit of distal main or side branch treatment with a DCB compared to POBA in coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of bifurcation lesions is application of a DES to the main branch with provisional side branch stenting. While this resulted in considerable improvement in overall MACE rate suboptimal side branch results remained a problem. METHODS: The study was performed from 2011 to 2013 in six German centers. Native bifurcation lesions were included if side branch vessel diameter was ≥2 and ≤3.5 mm and no proximal main branch lesions was found. After successful predilatation randomization was performed to either DCB application or no further treatment. Follow-up angiograms for QCA analysis were done after 9 months. Primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL). RESULTS: 64 patients were successfully randomized. Minimal lumen diameter and grade of stenosis were equal in both groups. Only five stents were used as bail out. Angiographic follow-up was achieved in 75 % of patients. No patient died. There was one NSTEMI in the POBA group. Restenosis rate was 6 % in the DCB group vs 26 % in the POBA group (p = 0.045). TLR was necessary in one patient of the DCB group vs three patients of the POBA. The primary endpoint LLL was 0.13 mm in the DCB vs 0.51 mm in the POBA group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In bifurcation lesions that show only class A or B dissection and recoil not beyond 30 % the use of DCBs is a sound strategy.

Six-Year Prognostic Value of Microvascular Obstruction After Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction as Assessed by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Although recent studies showed the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters especially microvascular obstruction (MO) after reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a study assessing their prognostic significance for long-term follow-up is missing so far. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of MO on long-term prognosis after reperfused first STEMI in a setting allocating CMR-assessed parameters to hard clinical events only. In 249 patients, CMR was performed after reperfused STEMI, and hereby, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct size (IS), and the amount of MO were quantified. Follow-up (median 6.0 years) was obtained regarding occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE occurred more often in patients showing presence of MO (MO vs no MO: n = 61 [54%] vs n = 12 [9%], p <0.0001). By multivariate analysis, the extent of MO remained the strongest predictor (p <0.001) for occurrence of MACE and provided incremental prognostic value over clinical variables and LVEF (p = 0.028, c-index increase from 0.723 to 0.817). In conclusion, CMR-assessed MO proves predictive for assessment of 6-year prognosis in patients after reperfused first STEMI and provides incremental prognostic information over clinical variables and LVEF in a setting based on hard end points.

Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of adenosine for measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) constitutes the current gold standard to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses. Limited data validate the intracoronary application of adenosine against standard intravenous infusion. We systematically compared FFR measurements during intracoronary and intravenous application of adenosine about agreement and reproducibility. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 114 patients with an intermediate degree of stenosis in coronary angiography. Two FFR measurements were performed during intracoronary bolus injection (40 µg for the right and 80 µg for the left coronary artery, FFRic), and 2 FFR measurements during continuous intravenous infusion of adenosine (140 µg/kg per minute, FFRiv). FFR value, the time to reach FFR and patient discomfort (on a subjective scale from 0 for no symptoms to 5 for maximal discomfort) were recorded for each measurement. Mean time to FFR was 100 ± 27 s for continuous intravenous infusion versus 23 ± 14 s for intracoronary bolus administration of adenosine (P < 0.001). Reported discomfort after intracoronary application was significantly lower compared with intravenous adenosine (subjective scale > 0 in 35.1% versus 87.7% of the patients; P < 0.001). Correlation between FFRiv and FFRic was extremely close (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) with no systematic bias in Bland-Altman analysis (bias 0.002 [confidence interval, -0.001 to 0.005]) and low intermethod variability (1.56%). Intramethod variability was not different between intravenous and intracoronary administration (1.47% versus 1.33%; P=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary bolus injection of adenosine (40 µg for the right and 80 µg for the left coronary artery) yields identical FFR results compared with intravenous infusion (140 µg/kg per minute), while requiring less time and offering superior patient comfort.

Complete recovery after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with prolonged (59 min) mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mild therapeutic hypothermia and complex percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

We report on a 68 years old survivor of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with favorable neurological outcome following prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR 59 min) until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The case demonstrates the beneficial effect of an optimal rescue chain including basic life support performed by trained bystanders, short response time of the emergency medical service, uninterrupted CPR during transportation using a mechanical chest compression system (LUCAS®), in combination with optimal intensive care management of cardiogenic shock after ROSC including multivessel emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intravascular therapeutic hypothermia (Coolgard®-System).

CT predictors of post-procedural aortic regurgitation in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis of 105 patients.

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) allows accurate and detailed analysis of the anatomy of the aortic root and valve, including quantification of calcium. We evaluated the correlation between different CT parameters and the degree of post-procedural aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien prosthesis. Pre-intervention contrast-enhanced dual source CT data sets of 105 consecutive patients (48 males, mean age 81 ± 6 years, mean logEuroSCORE 34 ± 13%) with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis referred for TAVI using the Edwards Sapien prosthesis (Edwards lifesciences, Inc., CA, USA) were analysed. The degrees of aortic valve commissural calcification and annular calcification were visually assessed on a scale from 0 to 3. Furthermore, the degree of aortic valve calcification as quantified by the Agatston score, aortic annulus eccentricity, aortic diameter at the level of the sinus of valsalva and at the sinotubular junction were assessed. Early post-procedural AR was assessed using aortography. Significant AR was defined as angiographic AR of at least moderate degree (AR ≥ 2). Visual assessment of the degree of aortic annular calcification as well as the Agatston score of aortic valve calcium correlated weakly, yet significantly with the degree of post-procedural AR (r = 0.31 and 0.24, p = 0.001 and 0.013, respectively). Compared to patients with AR < 2, patients with AR ≥ 2 showed more severe calcification of the aortic annulus (mean visual scores 1.9 ± 0.6 vs. 1.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.003) as well as higher aortic valve Agatston scores (1,517 ± 861 vs. 1,062 ± 688, p = 0.005). Visual score for commissural calcification did not differ significantly between both groups (mean scores 2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5, respectively, p = 0.117). No significant correlation was observed between the degree of AR and commissural calcification, aortic annulus eccentricity index or aortic diameters. The extent of aortic valve annular calcification, but not of commissural calcification, predicts significant post-procedural AR in patients referred for TAVI using the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens prosthesis.

Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.

Radial access use has been growing steadily but, despite encouraging results, still varies greatly among operators, hospitals, countries and continents. Twenty years from its introduction, it was felt that the time had come to develop a common evidence-based view on the technical, clinical and organisational implications of using the radial approach for coronary angiography and interventions. The European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) has, therefore, appointed a core group of European and non-European experts, including pioneers of radial angioplasty and operators with different practices in vascular access supported by experts nominated by the Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Their goal was to define the role of the radial approach in modern interventional practice and give advice on technique, training needs, and optimal clinical indications.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: long-term survival and neurological outcome.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are incompletely understood, including the influence of successful coronary reperfusion. METHODS: We analysed clinical and procedural data as well as 1-year outcome of 72 consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary intervention (PCI) after witnessed OHCA and STEMI and compared the results with 695 patients with STEMI and PCI, but without OHCA. Neurological recovery after OHCA was assessed using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale. RESULTS: PCI was successful in 83.3% after OHCA vs. 84.3% in the non-OHCA group (p=0.87). One-year mortality was 34.7% vs. 9.5% (p<0.001). 58.3% of the OHCA-patients showed complete neurological recovery (CPC 1) or moderate neurological disability (CPC 2). Another 6.9% showed severe cerebral disability (CPC 3) or permanent vegetative status (CPC 4). Delay from collapse until start of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Life Support (ACLS) was shorter for survivors with CPC status ≤2 (median 1 min, range 0-11 min) compared to non-survivors or survivors with CPC status >2 (median 8 min, range 0-13 min), p<0.0001. Age-adjusted multivariate analysis identified 'unsuccessful PCI', 'vasopressors on admission' and 'start of ACLS after >6 min' as independent predictors of negative long-term outcome (death or CPC >2). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is high in patients with STEMI complicated by OHCA - even though PCI was performed with the same success rate as in patients without OHCA. The majority of survivors had favourable neurological outcomes at 1 year, especially if advanced life support had been started within ≤6 min and PCI was successful.

A method to determine suitable fluoroscopic projections for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: In transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), optimal selection of fluoroscopic projections that permit orthogonal visualization of the aortic valve plane is important but may be difficult to achieve. OBJECTIVE: We developed and validated a simple method to predict suitable fluoroscopic projections on the basis of cardiac CT datasets. METHODS: In 75 consecutive patients that underwent TAVI, angulations in which a 35-mm thick maximum intensity projection would render all aortic valve calcium into 1 plane were determined by manual interaction with contrast-enhanced dual-source CT datasets. TAVI operators used the predicted angulation for the first aortic angiogram and performed additional aortic angiograms if no satisfactory view of the aortic valve plane was obtained. Predicted angulations were compared with the angulation used for valve implantation. Radiation exposure and contrast use was compared between patients with accurate prediction of fluoroscopic angulations by CT and patients in whom CT failed to predict a suitable view. RESULTS: The mean difference between the predicted angulation according to CT and the angulation used for implantation was 3 ± 6 degrees. CT predicted a suitable angulation (<5-degree deviation) in 63 of 75 cases (84%). The mean number of aortic angiograms acquired in patients with correct prediction (1.02 ± 0.1) was significantly lower than in patients with incorrect prediction of the implantation angle by CT (3.0 ± 1.7; P < 0.001). Contrast agent required for the entire TAVI procedure was lower in patients with correct prediction (72 ± 36 mL vs 106 ± 39 mL; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT permits prediction of suitable angulations for TAVI in most cases.

Embolic cerebral insults after transapical aortic valve implantation detected by magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the rate of periprocedural embolic ischemic brain injury during transapical aortic valve replacement in 25 consecutive patients. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is rapidly being established as a new therapeutic approach for aortic valve stenosis. Although initial clinical results are promising, it is unknown whether mobilization and embolization of calcified particles may lead to cerebral ischemia. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (10 men, 15 women, mean age: 81 ± 5 years, mean log EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation]: 32 ± 10%) scheduled for transapical aortic valve implantation were included. All patients received a baseline cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scan. The scan was repeated approximately 6 days after valve implantation. The magnetic resonance imaging studies included axial diffusion-weighted, T(2)-weighted, fluid attenuated inversion recovery-weighted, and T(2) gradient echo sequences. Standardized assessment of the neurologic status was performed before aortic valve replacement and post-operatively. RESULTS: Transapical aortic valve implantation was successfully performed in all patients. In 17 patients (68%), new cerebral lesions could be detected, whereas 8 patients showed no new cerebral insults. The pattern of distribution and morphology were typical of embolic origin. Despite the high incidence of morphologically detectable lesions, only 5 patients showed clinical neurologic alterations. Out of these patients, only 1 suffered from a permanent stroke. CONCLUSIONS: New embolic ischemic cerebral insults are detected in 68% of patients after transapical valve implantation. Clinical symptoms are rare and usually transitory. Larger trials will need to establish the clinical significance of asymptomatic ischemic lesions as well as the rate of ischemic events in patients undergoing transfemoral valve replacement.

Short-term prognosis of contemporary interventional therapy of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: does gender matter?

BACKGROUND: A higher mortality risk for women with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been a common finding in the past, even after acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We set out to analyze whether there are gender differences in real-world contemporary treatment and outcomes of STEMI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with STEMI and acute coronary angiography with the intention of performing a PCI at our center 6/1999-6/2006 was carried out (n = 566). Data were examined for gender-specific differences regarding patients' characteristics, referral patterns, timing of acute symptoms, angiographic findings, procedural details, and adverse events at 30 days after PCI. RESULTS: Women (n = 161) were on average 8 years older than men (n = 405), had higher co-morbidity, were more often transported to the hospital by ambulance and presented less often to the emergency room on their own (4.2% vs. 12.6% in men, P = 0.02). The pre-hospital delay from symptom onset to admission was significantly longer for women (median 185 vs. 135 min, P < 0.02). There was no gender difference in time from admission to PCI (median 46 min vs. 48 min, P = 0.42). Both genders received PCI with similar frequency (88.8% vs. 92.4%, P = 0.19), with similar success rates (83.2% vs. 85.3%, P = 0.68). Thirty-day overall mortality for women was not significantly higher than for men (8.7% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.6). Re-infarction or stroke within 30 days were rare for both genders without gender-specific differences whereas bleeding necessitating blood replacement was significantly more frequent in women (16.8% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, female gender was not independently associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality (OR 0.964, P = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Women underwent PCI therapy for STEMI with the same frequency and the same angiographic success as men. Despite their more advanced age and the higher prevalence of co-morbidities, they did not have a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate than men. Female gender was not an independent risk factor of 30-day mortality. Longer pre-hospital delays before hospital admission in women indicate that awareness of risk from coronary artery disease should be further raised in women.

Outcomes of contemporary interventional therapy of ST elevation infarction in patients older than 75 years.

BACKGROUND: Data on contemporary real-world outcomes of interventional revascularization in patients > or = 75 y of age with ST elevation infarction (STEMI) are limited. METHODS: We analyzed all 504 consecutive patients who underwent angiography for acute STEMI between 1999 and 2005 at our center, and followed them up over one year. Outcomes in patients > or = 75 y of age were compared with younger patients. RESULTS: Patients > or = 75 y of age (n = 115) were majority females (55% versus 21%, p < 0.001), more cases of diabetes (42% versus 27%, p = 0.004), hypertension (78% versus 65%, p = 0.03) and a history of coronary events (25% versus 15%, p = 0.002). Younger patients were more often smokers (63% versus 30%, p < 0.001). After coronary angiography patients > or = 75 y of age underwent less frequent intervention (PCI; 84% versus 93%, p = 0.01). However, if PCI was performed, technical success rates were similar to younger patients (84% versus 86%). The 30-d mortality was 13% versus 6.4% (p = 0.03), but after successful PCI, the 30-d mortality rate was not significantly higher in old patients (7.4% versus 3.9%, p = 0.23). Bleeding complications were very low in both age groups if the radial access route was chosen. Multivariate predictors of 30-d mortality were cardiogenic shock/survived cardiac arrest, ejection fraction < 30%, conservative treatment or unsuccessful PCI (OR 3.01), renal insufficiency, diabetes, and age. One-y mortality was higher in the elderly (24.3% versus 9.9%, p < 0.001). Among 30-d-survivors, only multivessel disease and age were multivariate predictors of 1-y mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients > or = 75 y of age benefit from PCI in STEMI, and failed or unattempted PCI worsens prognosis in the old as well as in younger patients.

Predictive value of the decrease in circulating dendritic cell precursors in stable coronary artery disease.

DCs (dendritic cells) are present in atherosclerotic lesions leading to vascular inflammation, and the number of vascular DCs increases during atherosclerosis. Previously, we have shown that the levels of circulating DCPs (DC precursors) are reduced in acute coronary syndromes through vascular recruitment. In the present study, we have investigated whether DCP levels are also reduced in stable CAD (coronary artery disease). The levels of circulating mDCPs (myeloid DCPs), pDCPs (plasmacytoid DCPs) and tDCP (total DCPs) were investigated using flow cytometry in 290 patients with suspected stable CAD. A coronary angiogram was used to evaluate a CAD score for each patient as follows: (i) CAD excluded (n=57); (ii) early CAD (n=63); (iii) moderate CAD (n=85); and (iv) advanced CAD (n=85). Compared with controls, patients with advanced stable CAD had lower HDL (high-density lipoprotein)-cholesterol (P=0.03) and higher creatinine (P=0.003). In advanced CAD, a significant decrease in circulating mDCPs, pDCPs and tDCPs was observed (each P<0.001). A significant inverse correlation was observed between the CAD score and mDCPs, pDCPs or tDCPs (each P<0.001). Patients who required percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting had less circulating mDCPs, pDCPs and tDCPs than controls (each P<0.001). Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis suggested mDCPs, pDCPs and tDCPs as independent predictors of CAD. In conclusion, we have shown that patients with stable CAD have significantly lower levels of circulating DCPs than healthy individuals. Their decrease appears to be an independent predictor of the presence of, and subsequent therapeutic procedure in, stable CAD.

Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age.

AIMS: The transradial (TR) approach has potentially lower complication rates than transfemoral (TF) approach coronary angiography. However, it may be technically more challenging, especially in elderly patients with alterations in vascular anatomy. We thus determined success rates, procedural data, and complication rates of TR angiography in comparison to the TF approach in elderly patients in a randomized, prospective trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred consecutive patients >or=75 years with known or suspected coronary artery disease were included in the study. After exclusion of 93 patients with contraindications to the radial approach, 152 patients were randomized to the TR and 155 to TF coronary angiography and intervention. In 13 patients randomized to TR, cross-over to TF was necessary (9%). Total examination time was significantly longer for the TR approach (18.1 vs. 15.0 min, P = 0.009), but no difference was found for fluoroscopy time, number of catheters used, or amount of contrast agent. The rate of major complications (bleeding requiring surgery or transfusion, stroke) was 0% for TR and 3.2% for TF approach (P < 0.001). Minor complications occurred in 1.3% versus 5.8% of patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, TR coronary angiography and intervention has a high technical success rate and lower complication rates than the TF approach.

Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: time for a consensus!

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary bifurcation lesions remains a subject of debate. Many studies have been published in this setting. They are often small scale and display methodological flaws and other shortcomings such as inaccurate designation of lesions, heterogeneity, and inadequate description of techniques implemented. METHODS: The aim is to propose a consensus established by the European Bifurcation Club (EBC), on the definition and classification of bifurcation lesions and treatments implemented with the purpose of allowing comparisons between techniques in various anatomical and clinical settings. RESULTS: A bifurcation lesion is a coronary artery narrowing occurring adjacent to, and/or involving, the origin of a significant side branch. The simple lesion classification proposed by Medina has been adopted. To analyze the outcomes of different techniques by intention to treat, it is necessary to clearly define which vessel is the distal main branch and which is (are) the side branche(s) and give each branch a distinct name. Each segment of the bifurcation has been named following the same pattern as the Medina classification. The classification of the techniques (MADS: Main, Across, Distal, Side) is based on the manner in which the first stent has been implanted. A visual presentation of PCI techniques and devices used should allow the development of a software describing quickly and accurately the procedure performed. CONCLUSION: The EBC proposes a new classification of bifurcation lesions and their treatments to permit accurate comparisons of well described techniques in homogeneous lesion groups.

Measurement of coronary artery bifurcation angles by multidetector computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal stent deployment in coronary artery bifurcations requires information about the angle between main vessel and side branch. We evaluated the accuracy and interobserver variability of bifurcation angle measurements by contrast-enhanced 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in comparison with invasive angiography and examined the average angles of 4 main coronary bifurcations. METHODS: To determine the accuracy of MDCT for measurement of bifurcation angles, we scanned a coronary artery phantom containing 6 bifurcations (2-mm metal rods with angles between 25 degrees and 90 degrees ) using MDCT, and angles determined in the MDCT data set were compared with the true values. To assess interobserver variability of angle measurements in comparison to invasive angiography, the angles of 3 bifurcation sites (left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary artery [LAD/LCX], LAD and first diagonal branch [LAD/Diag 1], and posterior descending coronary artery and right posterolateral branch [PDA/Rpld]) were determined in 15 patients both in 16-detector row MDCT data sets and invasive coronary angiograms by 2 independent observers each. To assess the natural distribution of the 4 main coronary artery bifurcation angles (LAD and LCX, LAD and Diag 1, LCX and OM1, PDA and Rpld), the average angles of these bifurcations were determined in 16-slice MDCT data sets acquired for coronary artery visalization in a group of 100 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. RESULTS: The phantom study revealed a mean difference between measured and true angles of 0.7 +/- 0.5 degrees . In the comparison MDCT versus invasive angiography, the 45 angles were significantly lager in MDCT (mean: 66 +/- 20 degrees vs. 56 +/- 24 degrees , P = 0.027). Interobserver variability was significantly lower in MDCT (r = 0.91) than invasive angiography (r = 0.62). Analysis of the natural distribution of bifurcation angles by MDCT revealed average values of 80 +/- 27 degrees (LAD/LCX), 46 +/- 19 degrees (LAD/Diag1), 48 +/- 24 degrees (LCX/OM1), and 53 +/- 27 degrees (PDA/Rpld), respectively. CONCLUSION: MDCT allows assessment of coronary bifurcation angles with high accuracy, which may be of future potential for planning interventional treatment.