Regular aspirin use among a sample of American Indians/Alaskan Natives in the Upper Midwest region of the United States.

Despite high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors among American Indian or Alaska Native adults (AI/AN), there is little information on aspirin use in this population. This survey-based study seeks to understand prevalence of aspirin use in a sample of AI/AN adults in the Upper Midwestern United States. In-person and telephone based surveys were conducted querying self-reported CVD and CVD risk factors, aspirin use, and aspirin related discussion with clinicians. A total of 237 AI/AN participants were included: mean age (SD) was 60.8 (8.4) years; 143 (60 %) were women; 59 (25 %) reported CVD history. CVD risk factors were common particularly smoking (37 %) and diabetes (37 %). Aspirin use was much higher among those with CVD (secondary prevention, 76 %) than those without (primary prevention, 33 %). Primary prevention aspirin use was significantly associated with age and all CVD risk factors in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for demographics and CVD risk factors, only age (aRR 1.13 per 5 years, 95 % CI 1.02, 1.25) and diabetes (aRR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.52, 3.92) remained significantly associated with aspirin. Regardless of CVD status, a higher proportion of those taking aspirin reported a conversation about aspirin with their doctor compared to those not taking aspirin. Among participants with no CVD, those who had such a conversation were 2.6 times more likely to use aspirin than those who did not have a conversation (aRR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.58, 4.44). The findings of this study emphasize the importance of the patient-provider relationship for preventive therapy.

Association of a Community Population and Clinic Education Intervention Program With Guideline-Based Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Low-dose aspirin is used for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in approximately one-third of the US adult population. Overuse and underuse are common and not concordant with guidelines. Objective: To test a community and clinic education intervention to improve guideline-based aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Ask About Aspirin project was a nonrandomized controlled trial conducted from, July 1, 2015, to March 31, 2020, using professional education, traditional media, and digital media to improve guideline-based aspirin use. The adult population (aged 45-79 years for men and 55-79 years for women) and primary care clinics in Minnesota were the education targets. The 4 adjacent states were controls. Interventions: The statewide campaign distributed billboards, newspaper articles and other print material, and radio announcements. An Ask About Aspirin website was heavily promoted. Primary care clinics identified appropriate aspirin candidates, and clinicians received continuing education about aspirin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Guideline-based aspirin use by the target population. Results: Cross-sectional random telephone surveys of 8342 men aged 45 to 79 years and women aged 55 to 79 years were conducted at baseline, 2 years, and 4 years after the intervention. Participation was similar between men and women (baseline: 973 [49%] vs 1001 [51%]; year 4: 912 [50%] vs 930 [50%]). Age during the study also was similar (baseline: 64.7 [IQR, 64.4-65.1] years; year 4: 66.2 [IQR, 65.8-66.5] years). A validated questionnaire evaluated aspirin use. The Ask About Aspirin website had more than 1 million visits; 124 primary care clinics with more than 1000 participating clinicians were part of the education program. Small, nonsignificant increases in discussions with clinicians regarding aspirin resulted (baseline: 341 of 1001 [34%]; year 4: 339 of 930 [36%]; P = .27). Overall aspirin use decreased after the release of new US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines in 2016 and 3 aspirin randomized clinical trials in 2018 suggested reduced aspirin use (baseline: 816 of 1974 [41%]; year 4: 629 of 1842 [34%]; P < .001). Decreases were also noted from year 2 to year 4 in appropriate use (year 2: 597 of 1208 [49%]; year 4: 478 of 1191 [40%]; P < .001) and overuse (year 2: 170 of 602 [28%]; year 4: 151 of 651 [23%]; P = .04). There were no significant differences between Minnesota and the control states. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, a multiyear statewide campaign was not associated with increased appropriate aspirin use for cardiovascular disease prevention. Contextual factors during the project, including guideline changes and media controversy following the new trials, undermined study goals. These findings suggest that although education programs using social media for cardiovascular disease prevention can result in millions of hits, the use of this strategy to encourage behavior change is problematic, even with supportive clinical sites. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607917.

Association of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors With Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Beliefs Among a Community-Based Sample of African American Adults in Minnesota.

OBJECTIVE: To assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors and their association with sociodemographic characteristics and health beliefs among African American (AA) adults in Minnesota. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of a community-based sample of AA adults enrolled in the Minnesota Heart Health Program Ask About Aspirin study from May 2019 to September 2019. Sociodemographic characteristics, health beliefs, and self-reported CVD and CVD risk factors were collected. Prevalence ratio (PR) estimates were calculated using Poisson regression modeling to assess the association between participants' characteristics and age- and sex-adjusted CVD risk factors. RESULTS: The sample included 644 individuals (64% [412] women) with a mean age of 61 years. Risk factors for CVD were common: hypertension (67% [434]), hyperlipidemia (47% [301]), diabetes (34% [219]), and current cigarette smoking (25% [163]); 19% (119) had CVD. Those with greater perceived CVD risk had a higher likelihood of prevalent hyperlipidemia (PR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.57), diabetes (PR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.98), and CVD (PR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.23) compared with those with lower perceived risk. Trust in health care provider was high (83% [535]) but was not associated with CVD or CVD risk factors. CONCLUSION: In this community sample of AAs in Minnesota, CVD risk factors were high, as was trust in health care providers. Those with greater CVD risk perceptions had higher CVD prevalence. Consideration of sociodemographic and psychosocial influences on CVD and CVD risk factors could inform development of effective cardiovascular health promotion interventions in the AA Minnesota community.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Quality of Kidney Care: Data From Electronic Health Records.

RATIONAL & OBJECTIVE: Electronic health records can be leveraged to assess quality-of-care measures in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Neighborhood socioeconomic status could be a potential barrier to receiving appropriate evidence-based therapy and follow-up. We examined whether neighborhood socioeconomic status is independently associated with quality of care received by patients with CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using electronic health record data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of patients seen at a health care system in the 7-county Minneapolis/St Paul area. EXPOSURES: Census tract socioeconomic status measures (wealth, income, and education). OUTCOMES: Indicators of CKD quality of care: (1) prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with stage ≥ 3 CKD or stage 1 or 2 CKD with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) > 300 mg/d, (2) UACR measurement among patients with laboratory-based CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.72 m2), and (3) CKD identified on the problem list or coded for at an encounter among patients with laboratory-based CKD. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Multilevel Poisson regression with robust error variance with a random intercept at the census tract level. RESULTS: Of the 16,776 patients who should be receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, 65% were prescribed these medications. Among patients with laboratory-based CKD (n = 25,097), UACR was measured in 27% and CKD was identified in the electronic health record in 55%. We found no independent association between any neighborhood socioeconomic status measures and CKD quality-of-care indicators. LIMITATIONS: 1 health care system and selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association of neighborhood socioeconomic status with quality of CKD care in our cohort. However, adherence to CKD guidelines is low, indicating an opportunity to improve care for all patients regardless of neighborhood socioeconomic status.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Health Insurance, and CKD Prevalence: Findings From a Large Health Care System.

RATIONAL & OBJECTIVE: Neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and health insurance status may be important upstream social determinants of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but their relationship remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether neighborhood SES and individual-level health insurance status were independently associated with CKD prevalence. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using electronic health records (EHRs). SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: EHRs of patients (n = 185,269) seen at a health care system in the 7-county Minneapolis/St Paul area (2017-2018). EXPOSURES: Census tract neighborhood SES measures (median value of owner-occupied housing units [wealth], percentage of residents aged >25 years with bachelor's degree or higher [education]) and individual-level health insurance status (aged <65 years: Medicaid vs other insurance; ≥65 years: Medicare vs Medicare and supplemental insurance plan) were obtained from the American Community Survey and EHR data. Neighborhood SES was operationalized into quartiles, comparing low (first quartile) versus high (fourth quartile) neighborhood SES. OUTCOMES: CKD prevalence: estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or proteinuria. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Multilevel Poisson regression with robust error variance with a random intercept at the census-tract level, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates, was used to estimate the association between neighborhood SES, insurance, and CKD. RESULTS: Neighborhood SES and insurance were independently associated with CKD prevalence. In covariate-adjusted models, patients living in low versus high neighborhood SES had a higher CKD prevalence among both younger and older patients. For example, the prevalence ratios of CKD in low versus high neighborhood SES as defined by education among patients younger than 65 and 65 years and older were 1.11 (95% CI, 1.05-1.18) and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.12), respectively. Patients younger than 65 years receiving Medicaid had higher CKD prevalence versus those with other insurance (1.51 [95% CI, 1.43-1.6]). For patients 65 years and older, insurance was not associated with prevalence of CKD in the fully adjusted model. LIMITATIONS: One health care system and selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Living in low neighborhood SES as defined by wealth and education and having Medicaid for patients younger than 65 years were associated with higher CKD prevalence.

News coverage about aspirin as a countervailing force against low-dose aspirin campaign promotion.

Organized health promotion efforts sometimes compete with news media, social media, and other sources when providing recommendations for healthy behavior. In recent years, patients have faced a complicated information environment regarding aspirin use as a prevention tool for heart health. We explored the possibility that campaign promotion of low-dose aspirin use might have been undermined by news coverage in the USA detailing controversies regarding aspirin use. Using time series data on low-dose aspirin sales in Minnesota, USA, we assessed whether news coverage of aspirin or audience engagement with the Ask About Aspirin campaign website predicted subsequent changes in low-dose aspirin sales, over and above any secular trend. News coverage predicted actual low-dose aspirin purchases whereas exposure to a state-level campaign did not. While a campaign effort to encourage people at risk to discuss low-dose aspirin use with their health care providers did not generate substantive changes in low-dose aspirin tablet sales in the areas of Minnesota monitored for this study, past news coverage about aspirin use, including news about negative side effects, may have suppressed low-dose aspirin sales during this same period. The extent of news coverage about aspirin and heart health had a negative effect on tablet sales recorded in greater Minnesota approximately a month later in an ARIMA time series model, coefficient = -.014, t = -2.33, p = .02. Presented evidence of news coverage effect suggests health campaign assessment should consider trends in the public information environment as potential countervailing forces.

A community-based group randomized trial to increase aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Study protocol and baseline results for the "Ask About Aspirin" initiative.

BACKGROUND: USPSTF evidence-based recommendations for the use of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease were published in 2009. We describe a statewide campaign using innovative methods to educate the public and health communities about appropriate aspirin use. METHODS/DESIGN: The "Ask About Aspirin" initiative is designed to lower the number of first heart attacks and strokes in the State of Minnesota by promoting the appropriate use of low dose aspirin. A health system intervention combined with an aspirin awareness media campaign will be evaluated in a pragmatic group randomized controlled trial including 267 primary care clinics within 84 health systems over a four year period. Matched pairs of geographic territories will be randomized to intervention (12 territories) or control (12 territories). The primary outcome of appropriate aspirin use will be measured at the individual level, by community-based telephone surveys of 100 participants in each of the 24 geographically determined clusters. DISCUSSION: We briefly describe the rationale for the interventions being studied, as well as the major design choices. Rigorous research designs such as the one described here are necessary to determine whether evidence-based recommendations can be effectively disseminated in multiple health systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02607917.

Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Trends in use patterns among African American adults in Minnesota, 2015-2019.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) disproportionately affects African Americans. Aspirin has long been recommended to reduce cardiovascular events. However, national guideline changes in 2016 limited the aspirin recommended population and several clinical trials questioning the utility of primary prevention aspirin were published in 2018. In light of the recent guidelines and study findings, we investigated primary prevention aspirin use among urban African American adults. Using three cross-sectional surveys, we collected data from self-identified African Americans with no CVD in 2015, 2017 and 2019, querying information on CVD risk factors, health behaviors and beliefs, and aspirin use. Poisson regression modeling was used to estimate age- and risk-factor adjusted aspirin prevalence, trends and associations. A total of 1491 African Americans adults, ages 45-79, were included in this analysis; 61% were women. There was no change in age- and risk factor-adjusted aspirin use over the 3 surveys for women (37%, 34% and 35% respectively) or men (27%, 25%, 30% respectively). However, fewer participants believed aspirin was helpful in 2019 compared to 2015-75% versus 84% (p < 0.001). Aspirin discussions with a health care practitioner were highly associated with aspirin use (adjusted RR 2.97, 95% CI 2.49-3.54) and aspirin use was 2.56 times higher (adjusted RR 95% CI 2.17-3.03) in respondents who agreed that people close to them thought they should take aspirin compared with those who disagreed or did not know. Despite major changes in national guidelines, overall primary prevention aspirin use did not significantly change in these African American samples from 2015 to 2019.

Bending the Curve in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Bethesda + 40 and Beyond.

More than 40 years after the 1978 Bethesda Conference on the Declining Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease provided the scientific community with a blueprint for systematic analysis to understand declining rates of coronary heart disease, there are indications the decline has ended or even reversed despite advances in our knowledge about the condition and treatment. Recent data show a more complex situation, with mortality rates for overall cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease and stroke, decelerating, whereas those for heart failure are increasing. To mark the 40th anniversary of the Bethesda Conference, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association cosponsored the "Bending the Curve in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Bethesda + 40" symposium. The objective was to examine the immediate and long-term outcomes of the 1978 conference and understand the current environment. Symposium themes included trends and future projections in cardiovascular disease (in the United States and internationally), the evolving obesity and diabetes epidemics, and harnessing emerging and innovative opportunities to preserve and promote cardiovascular health and prevent cardiovascular disease. In addition, participant-led discussion explored the challenges and barriers in promoting cardiovascular health across the lifespan and established a potential framework for observational research and interventions that would begin in early childhood (or ideally in utero). This report summarizes the relevant research, policy, and practice opportunities discussed at the symposium.

Aspirin Use and Misuse for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Daily aspirin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention is common among adults. Numerous clinical trials observe reduced cardiovascular disease with regular low-dose aspirin. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2016 published guidelines for aspirin use, but controversy exists about the side effects, and overuse or underuse may be common despite the guidelines. Using the Task Force recommendations, this paper describes the prevalence of appropriate aspirin use and physician advice in a population sample. METHODS: A random sample of men and women (aged 50-69 years) living in the Upper Midwest in 2017-2018 were surveyed, collecting demographic data, health history, and aspirin use. Appropriate primary prevention with aspirin was defined as having ≥10% cardiovascular disease risk (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking) with daily or every other day aspirin use. Those with prevalent cardiovascular disease were labeled as secondary prevention. RESULTS: A total of 1,352 adults were surveyed (697 women, 655 men). The criteria for secondary prevention were fulfilled in 188 participants, and these were eliminated from the analysis. In the remaining group, aspirin was indicated in 32.9% (383 of 1,164). Among those, 46.0% (176 of 383) were appropriate users, and 54.0% (207 of 383) were nonusers despite indications. Overuse, where aspirin is not indicated, was common at 26.9% (210 of 781). Discussion with a physician, although reported in 29% of subjects, was associated with some improvement in the appropriate use but also with overuse and underuse. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention is common. However, many adults are medicating without indication (overuse) or are not using aspirin despite guidelines (underuse).

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Identification of Patients With CKD Using Electronic Health Records.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) is recommended for patients with diabetes and hypertension as stated by the respective professional societies. However, CKD, a silent disease usually detected at later stages, is associated with low socioeconomic status (SES). We assessed whether adding census tract SES status to the standard screening approach improves our ability to identify patients with CKD. STUDY DESIGN: Screening test analysis. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: Electronic health records (EHR) of 256,162 patients seen at a health care system in the 7-county Minneapolis/St. Paul area and linked census tract data. EXPOSURE: The first quartile of census tract SES (median value of owner-occupied housing units <$165,200; average household income <$35,935; percentage of residents >25 years of age with a bachelor's degree or higher <20.4%), hypertension, and diabetes. OUTCOMES: CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, or urinary albumin-creatinine ratio >30mg/g, or urinary protein-creatinine ratio >150mg/g, or urinary analysis [albuminuria] >30 mg/d). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Sensitivity, specificity, and number needed to screen (NNS) to detect CKD if we screened patients who had hypertension and/or diabetes and/or who lived in low-SES tracts (belonging to the first quartile of any of the 3 measures of tract SES) versus the standard approach. RESULTS: CKD was prevalent in 13% of our cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, and NNS of detecting CKD after adding tract SES to the screening approach were 67% (95% CI, 66.2%-67.2%), 61% (95% CI, 61.1%-61.5%), and 5, respectively. With the standard approach, sensitivity of detecting CKD was 60% (95% CI, 59.4%-60.4%), specificity was 73% (95% CI, 72.4%-72.7%), and NNS was 4. LIMITATIONS: One health care system and selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging patients' addresses from the EHR and adding tract-level SES to the standard screening approach modestly increases the sensitivity of detecting patients with CKD at a cost of decreased specificity. Identifying further factors that improve CKD detection at an early stage are needed to slow the progression of CKD and prevent cardiovascular complications.

News coverage and online advertising effects on patient-led search for aspirin, heart health, and stroke information and educational tool use.

OBJECTIVE: Using indicators of campaign effort and relevant news stories, we sought to predict two patterns of patient behavior regarding information about aspirin and heart health: patient use of a campaign web tool to determine whether they should talk with a physician about using aspirin and patient searches for information about aspirin and the heart. METHODS: We used ARIMA modeling to predict two time series as a function of independent variables. RESULTS: We found significant prediction of time series in both models, but campaign expenditure only predicted use of a campaign web tool whereas weekly news stories predicted online searches regarding aspirin and the heart originating from Minnesota. CONCLUSION: Patient information engagement is a function of information salience at least in part. Campaign advertising expenditure can prompt audience use of campaign tools but news coverage also operates as an important force on patient search behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health promotion professionals charged with reaching patients with heart health and stroke prevention messages should monitor news coverage as a potential complementary or rival force while at the same time promoting campaign-related information online.

Cardiovascular Family History Increases Risk for Late-Onset Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Report.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of childhood cancer have an increased risk of therapy-related cardiovascular disease. It is not known whether family history of cardiovascular disease further increases risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes among survivors. METHODS: Family history of cardiovascular disease was collected from 1,260 survivors [median age at diagnosis, 8 years (range, 0-23); age at last follow-up, 35 years (range, 18-66)] of childhood cancer in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Multivariable risk models evaluated associations with cardiovascular disease (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2-4 events) and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Among survivors exposed to chest-directed radiation and/or anthracycline chemotherapy (n = 824), 7% reported a first-degree family history of heart failure, 19% myocardial infarction, 11% stroke, 26% atherosclerotic disease (myocardial infarction and/or stroke), 62% hypertension, and 31% diabetes mellitus. Eighteen percent of exposed survivors developed heart failure, 9% myocardial infarction, 3% stroke, 11% atherosclerotic disease, 30% hypertension, and 9% diabetes mellitus. Having a first-degree family history of atherosclerotic disease was independently associated with development of treatment-related heart failure [RR, 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.88; P = 0.04] among exposed survivors. Risk for hypertension was increased among exposed survivors with a first-degree family history of hypertension (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26-1.92; P < 0.0001) or of any cardiovascular disease [myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.59; P = 0.01)]. CONCLUSIONS: Family history of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors independently increased risk of heart failure and hypertension among survivors of childhood cancer exposed to cardiotoxic therapies. IMPACT: These data show the importance of cardiovascular family history as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in survivors of childhood cancer.

Cardiac biomarkers and association with subsequent cardiomyopathy and mortality among adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of childhood cancer exposed to cardiotoxic therapies are at significant cardiovascular risk. The utility of cardiac biomarkers for identifying the risk of future cardiomyopathy and mortality is unknown. METHODS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) were assessed in 1213 adults 10 or more years from a childhood cancer diagnosis; 786 were exposed to anthracycline chemotherapy and/or chest-directed radiation therapy (RT). NT-proBNP values above age- and sex-specific 97.5th percentiles were considered abnormal. Generalized linear models estimated cross-sectional associations between abnormal NT-proBNP and anthracycline or chest RT doses as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A Poisson distribution estimated rates and a Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for future cardiac events and death. RESULTS: At a median age of 35.5 years (interquartile range, 29.8-42.5 years), NT-proBNP and cTnT were abnormal in 22.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Exposure to chest RT and exposure to anthracycline chemotherapy were each associated with a dose-dependent increased risk for abnormal NT-proBNP (P for trend <.0001). Among exposed survivors with no history of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-graded cardiomyopathy and with normal systolic function, survivors with abnormal NT-proBNP had higher rates per 1000 person-years of cardiac mortality (2.93 vs 0.96; P < .0001) and future cardiomyopathy (32.10 vs 15.98; P < .0001) and an increased risk of future cardiomyopathy (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.28-4.08) according to a multivariable assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal NT-proBNP values were prevalent and, among survivors who were exposed to cardiotoxic therapy but did not have a history of cardiomyopathy or current systolic dysfunction, identified those at increased risk for future cardiomyopathy. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this novel finding.

Aspirin Use and Awareness for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Hispanics: Prevalence and Associations with Health Behavior Beliefs.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) persists as the leading cause of death and disability in many Americans including Hispanics. Primary prevention for CVD may be achieved through regular aspirin use in high risk individuals. This study examined regular aspirin use and specific attitudes and social norms toward CVD and aspirin use within an urban Hispanic population in Minnesota. A sample of primary prevention Hispanics aged 45-79 years were surveyed about CVD history and risk factors, aspirin use, demographic characteristics, and health beliefs and social norms in relation to CVD and aspirin. Relative risk estimation using Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to examine associations with aspirin use. In this sample of 152 Hispanics (55% women), the mean age was 53 years, 70% had a regular healthcare provider, and 22% used aspirin. Aspirin discussions with a regular healthcare provider were strongly associated with aspirin use (adjusted risk ratio 3.02, 95% CI 1.20-7.60). There was a positive association between health beliefs and social norms that affirm preventive behaviors and aspirin use (adjusted linear risk ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.45) while uncertainty about the role of aspirin for individual use and in the community was negatively associated with aspirin use (adjusted linear risk ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03). This growing population may benefit from health education about CVD risk and the role of aspirin in prevention.

Estimation of Cardiovascular Risk from Self-Reported Knowledge of Risk Factors: Insights from the Minnesota Heart Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cost-effective primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) relies on accuracy of risk assessment. Current risk scores require clinical and laboratory measures, are expensive and are often difficult to apply in the population setting. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to estimate CVD risk from individuals' knowledge of their own CVD risk factors and compare it to the risk calculated from measured risk factors. METHODS: Using the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equations (PCE), we calculated 10-year CVD risk for 9856 primary prevention individuals aged 40-79 in the Minnesota Heart Survey (MHS). Using log-linear regression models, we estimated PCE risk from the individual's self-reported knowledge of four dichotomous risk factors: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and smoking. Age was included in all models, and models were developed separately in women and men. Model performance was assessed internally using leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: The median measured PCE CVD risk in women was 2.1% (IQR: 0.8-5.6%), and in men was 6.3% (3.1-13.0%). Using the newly developed equations, the median estimated risk was 2.2% (0.9-5.8%) in women, and 6.9% (3.2-13.1%) in men. Using a threshold of 7.5% to categorize low and high risk, the novel risk calculation gave an accuracy of 95% for women and 87% for men compared to the measured PCE risk. The negative predictive value was 97% for women and 91% in men. CONCLUSION: Self-reported knowledge of risk may be useful in the identification of individuals at low risk for CV events, however, should always be followed up with measurement of risk factors if symptoms or history suggest CVD.

Exercise Intolerance, Mortality, and Organ System Impairment in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

PURPOSE: Exercise intolerance, associated with heart failure and death in general populations, is not well studied in survivors of childhood cancer. We examined prevalence of exercise intolerance in survivors exposed or not to cardiotoxic therapy, and associations among organ system function, exercise intolerance, and mortality. METHODS: Participants consisted of 1,041 people who had survived cancer ≥ 10 years (and had or did not have exposure to anthracyclines and/or chest-directed radiation) and 285 control subjects. Exercise intolerance was defined as peak oxygen uptake < 85% predicted from maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing; organ functions were ascertained with imaging or clinical testing. Multivariable regression of the data was performed to compare exercise capacity between survivors exposed or unexposed to cardiotoxic therapy and control subjects, and to evaluate associations between treatment and organ function, and organ function and exercise intolerance. Propensity score methods in time-to-event analyses evaluated associations between exercise intolerance and mortality. RESULTS: Survivors (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 35.6 ± 8.8 years) had lower mean (± SD) peak oxygen uptake (exposed: 25.74 ± 8.36 mL/kg/min; unexposed: 26.82 ± 8.36 mL/kg/min) than did control subjects (32.69 ± 7.75 mL/kg/min; P for all < .001). Exercise intolerance was present in 63.8% (95% CI, 62.0% to 65.8%) of exposed survivors, 55.7% (95% CI, 53.2% to 58.2%) of unexposed survivors, and 26.3% (95% CI, 24.0% to 28.3%) of control subjects, and was associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.09 to 14.14). Global longitudinal strain (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.63), chronotropic incompetence (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.75 to 7.31); forced expiratory volume in 1 second < 80% (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.09), and 1 SD decrease in quadriceps strength (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.82) were associated with exercise intolerance. Ejection fraction < 53% was not associated with exercise intolerance. CONCLUSION: Exercise intolerance is prevalent among childhood cancer survivors and associated with all-cause mortality. Treatment-related cardiac (detected by global longitudinal strain), autonomic, pulmonary, and muscular impairments increased risk. Survivors with impairments may require referral to trained specialists to learn to accommodate specific deficits when engaging in exercise.

Use of a Geographic Information System to create treatment groups for group-randomized community trials: The Minnesota Heart Health Program.

BACKGROUND: Group-randomized trials of communities often rely on the convenience of pre-existing administrative divisions, such as school district boundaries or census entities, to divide the study area into intervention and control sites. However, these boundaries may include substantial heterogeneity between regions, introducing unmeasured confounding variables. This challenge can be addressed by the creation of exchangeable intervention and control territories that are equally weighted by pertinent socio-demographic characteristics. The present study used territory design software as a novel approach to partitioning study areas for The Minnesota Heart Health Program's "Ask about Aspirin" Initiative. METHODS: Twenty-four territories were created to be similar in terms of age, sex, and educational attainment, as factors known to modify aspirin use. To promote ease of intervention administration, the shape and spread of the territories were controlled. Means of the variables used in balancing the territories were assessed as well as other factors that were not used in the balancing process. RESULTS: The analysis demonstrated that demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the intervention and control territories created by the territory design software. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of exchangeable territories diminishes geographically based impact on outcomes following community interventions in group-randomized trials. The method used to identify comparable geographical units may be applied to a wide range of population-based health intervention trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Institutes of Health (Clinical Trials.gov), Identifier: NCT02607917 . Registered on 16 November 2015.

Aspirin Use for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in an African American Population: Prevalence and Associations with Health Behavior Beliefs.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, disproportionately affecting African Americans. Aspirin is an effective, low cost option to reduce cardiovascular events. This study sought to describe the use of aspirin for CVD prevention in African Americans and evaluate associations with demographics, cardiovascular risk factors and health behaviors and beliefs. A total of 684 African Americans adults ages 45-79 years completed surveys and were included in this analysis. Proportions of aspirin use were stratified by primary and secondary prevention and by number of CVD risk factors in the primary prevention population. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with aspirin use. Secondary prevention aspirin use was 62%. Primary prevention aspirin use was 32% overall and increased to 54% in those with > 2 CVD risk factors. A history of diabetes [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.42, 95% CI 2.18-5.35] and hypertension (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.39-3.65) were strongly associated with primary prevention aspirin use, but a conversation with a health care provider was even stronger (aOR 6.41, 95% CI 4.07-10.08). Participants who answered positively to statements about people similar to them taking aspirin or that close contacts think they should take aspirin, were much more likely to take aspirin (aOR 4.80; 95% CI 2.58-8.93 and aOR 7.45; 95% CI 4.70-11.79 respectively). These findings support a hypothesis that aspirin use may increase by encouraging conversations with health care providers and creating a supportive social environment for aspirin use. Further studies need to be done to test this hypothesis.