Association of fractalkine with functional severity of heart failure and impact on clopidogrel efficacy in patients with ischemic heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with heart failure (HF) display elevated levels of soluble fractalkine, a chemokine involved in inflammation processes, atherosclerosis and platelet activation. Further, fractalkine has been associated with reduced pharmacodynamic (PD) responsiveness to clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of fractalkine with the severity of HF and its impact on platelet activation and clopidogrel response in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) with and without HF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective PD study included 116 stable CAD patients on DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. Subjects were classified in two groups: patients with HF and reduced (<40%) left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF group, n = 56) and patients without HF (no HF group, n = 60). Clinical severity of HF was graded according to NYHA classification. Platelet function assays included vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay, multiple electrode aggregometry and light transmittance aggregometry. Fractalkine and P-selectin concentrations were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Fractalkine levels progressively increased with the severity of the disease in the HFrEF group (NYHA I: 471.2 ± 52.4 pg/ml, NYHA II: 500.5 ± 38.4 pg/ml, NYHA III: 638.9 ± 54.3 pg/ml, p for linear trend 0.023). Numerically higher concentrations of fractalkine were observed in the HFrEF group compared to the no HF group with borderline significance (p = 0.052). No significant differences in clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition according to fractalkine values were observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fractalkine levels were increased in patients with HFrEF and positively associated with the functional severity of the disease. No evident impact of fractalkine on clopidogrel PD efficacy was found.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has represented one of the greatest advances in the cardiology field in recent years and has changed clinical practice for patients with aortic stenosis. Despite the continuous improvement in operators' experience and techniques, and the development of new generation devices, thromboembolic and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation remain frequent, and are a major concern due to their negative impact on prognosis in this vulnerable population. In addition, the optimal antithrombotic regimen in this scenario is not known, and current recommendations are mostly empirical and not evidence based. The present review aims to provide an overview of the current status of knowledge, including relevant on-going randomised trials, on antithrombotic treatment strategies after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

High and low on-treatment platelet reactivity to P2Y12 inhibitors in a contemporary cohort of acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION: There is compelling evidence supporting the association between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) to clopidogrel with atherothrombotic and bleeding events, respectively. However, it is uncertain if current cutoff values should be used in prasugrel- or ticagrelor-treated subjects. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) efficacy of P2Y12 antagonists in a contemporary real-world population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This PD study included 988 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and receiving dual therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor). Platelet function was assessed at day 1 and day 30 post-PCI by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, multiple electrode aggregometry and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay. RESULTS: Clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 324) had greater platelet reactivity than those receiving ticagrelor (n = 469) or prasugrel (n = 195) at both time points (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). No difference between ticagrelor and prasugrel was observed at day 1 with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (51.5 ±â€¯2.8 vs. 42.7 ±â€¯3.5 PRUs; p = 0.298), whereas ticagrelor achieved greater platelet inhibition at day 30 (48.1 ±â€¯2.5 vs. 89.2 ±â€¯4.2 PRUs; p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained with the VASP assay. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor had markedly lower HPR rates than clopidogrel and very high rates of LPR at both time points. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel and ticagrelor displayed more potent and consistent PD effects than clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing PCI, with a trend towards greater platelet inhibition with ticagrelor during the maintenance phase of therapy compared to prasugrel.

Dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation: Individualizing the optimal duration.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a P2Y12 receptor antagonist in addition to aspirin is the antiplatelet treatment of choice in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite DAPT being one of the most widely investigated treatment strategies in the cardiology field, its optimal duration after coronary stenting remains controversial. The balance between the possible benefit of preventing a thrombotic event and the risk of suffering a bleeding complication due to maintenance of therapy is of critical relevance to determine the duration of DAPT in a given patient. Indeed, extended DAPT is associated with a reduction in non-fatal ischemic outcomes, at the cost of increasing the risk of bleeding events. Of note, several factors related to the patient, the procedure, or the device implanted may influence the ischemic and/or bleeding risk profiles of a given patient. Therefore, it is reasonable to recommend that the decision on DAPT duration should be individualized on a case-to-case basis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of knowledge on duration of DAPT after coronary stenting, focusing on the evidence provided mainly by randomized clinical trials, as well as to discuss the factors that may influence the individual ischemic and bleeding risk profiles for a given patient, and whether the use of risk scores may inform the decision-making process for determining DAPT duration.

Infarto agudo del miocardio secundario a trauma cerrado de tórax / Acute myocardial infarction secundary to blunt chest trauma

Se presenta el caso de un hombre de 44 años de edad sin factores de riesgo coronario; éste, después de un entrenamiento de artes marciales en el que recibió múltiples traumatismos con golpe a mano cerrada y puntapié en la cara anterior del tórax durante enfrentamiento corporal, presentó dolor opresivo intenso en región retroesternal y acudió con dos médicos, quienes le prescribieron analgésicos y antiinflamatorios. Por la persistencia de la sintomatología sin mejoría, acudió con un tercer facultativo quien realizó un electrocardiograma (ECG), el cual documentó lesión subepicárdica inferior; fue trasladado para realizar coronariografía, la cual mostró oclusión trombótica funcional del segmento proximal de la coronaria derecha, misma que fue tratada exitosamente con intervención coronaria percutánea primaria e implante de stent medicado. Este caso muestra que el infarto agudo del miocardio asociado con trauma cerrado de tórax es una patología de difícil diagnóstico.

This is a case of the 44 year old male patient without history or risk factors for coronary disease, with blunt chest trauma in the anterior region after training of an Israeli martial art, right after he had typical retroesternal chest pain, he went to different doctors who prescribed different antiinflamatory drugs, because the persistence of the pain he decided to check with a third doctor who took an EKG and found an inferior epicardial lesion. Coronary angiography showed functional thrombotic occlusion of proximal segment of the right coronary. Successful primary angioplasty and stenting was done. The case shows that myocardial infarction after blunt chest trauma is challenging in terms of diagnosis and treatment.