Food emulsifiers aggravate inflammation and oxidative stress induced by food contaminants in zebrafish.

Food emulsifiers like glycerol monostearate (G) and Tween 80 (TW) are commonly used to help formation and maintain stability of emulsions. However, certain food contaminants and emulsifiers often co-occur in the same food item due to food culture and cooking methods. For this reason, the present study investigated interaction of toxic effect of emulsifiers (G and TW) and process contaminants (acrylamide (AA) and benzo [a]pyrene (BAP)) on zebrafish. Adult zebrafish were exposed to emulsifiers, food contaminants, or the combination through diet for 2 h and 7 days. Oxidative stress and inflammation caused by food contaminants were increased when food emulsifiers were present. These combined treatments also induced more severe morphological changes than the contaminant alone treatments. In the gut, disruption of villi structure and increased number of goblet cells was observed and in the liver there were increased lipid deposition, infiltration of immune cells, glycogen depletion and focal necrosis. Increased accumulation of AA and BAP in the liver and gut were detected after addition of emulsifiers, suggesting that emulsifiers can enhance absorption of diet-borne contaminants. Our results showed food emulsifiers and contaminants can interact synergistically and increase risk.

Food emulsifiers increase toxicity of food contaminants in three human GI tract cell lines.

Food products simultaneously containing both food contaminants and emulsifiers are common in baked products, coffee and chocolate. Little is known regarding how food contaminants and emulsifiers interact and alter toxicity. Recent studies have shown that while emulsifiers themselves have little toxicity, they could cause changes in the gut microenvironment and lead to issues such as increased uptake of allergens. This study examined toxic effect of two common process contaminants acrylamide (AA) and benzo [a]pyrene (BAP) combined with food emulsifiers polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (TW) or glycerol monostearate (G). In liver cell line HepG2 and gastrointestinal cell lines HIEC6 and Caco-2, toxicities of AA and BAP were increased by TW but not by G as indicated by decrease in IC50 values. Addition of TW also exacerbated gene expression changes caused by AA or BAP. Cellular uptake and cell membrane permeability were enhanced by TW but not by G, but tight junction proteins of Caco-2 monolayer was impacted by both emulsifiers. These results suggested that TW could increase toxicity of AA and BAP through increasing cell permeability thus chemical uptake and potentially through other interactions. The study is to draw the attention of regulators on the potential synergistic interaction of co-occurring chemicals in food.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in head and neck cancer: something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue and a sixpence in your shoe.

A biomarker is a measurable indicator of biological or pathological processes or the response to an exposure or intervention and is used to guide management decisions. In head and neck pathology, biomarkers are assessed by histological criteria and immunohistochemical and molecular studies. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of management of many head and neck malignancies. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy may be administered depending on the presence of adverse prognostic factors identified on histopathological or immunohistochemical examination. In this review, we outline the clinically relevant prognostic and predictive factors in head and neck malignancies including conventionally recognised factors such as tumour size, depth of invasion, lymphovascular and perineural invasion and margin status as well as novel evolving factors such as recurrent genetic rearrangements and assessment of immune checkpoints. Practical issues are discussed to assist with recognising and reporting of these factors. A summary of useful tools such as structured pathology report formats is also included to assist with comprehensive reporting of all clinically relevant parameters, minimise risk and improve workflow efficiencies.

A Matched Molecular and Clinical Analysis of the Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma Cohort in the Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program and Contextual Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare malignant vascular tumour with a prevalence of 1 per 1,000,000. It is typically molecularly characterised by a WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusion in approximately 90% of cases, or a YAP1::TFE3 gene fusion in approximately 10% of cases. EHE cases are typically refractory to therapies, and no anticancer agents are reimbursed for EHE in Australia. METHODS: We report a cohort of nine EHE cases with comprehensive histologic and molecular profiling from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program (WEHI-SFRCP) collated via nation-wide referral to the Australian Rare Cancer (ARC) Portal. The diagnoses of EHE were confirmed by histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) examination. Molecular profiling was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay, the TruSight RNA fusion panel, whole genome sequencing (WGS), or whole exome sequencing (WES). RESULTS: Molecular analysis of RNA, DNA or both was possible in seven of nine cases. The WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion was identified in five cases. The YAP1::TFE3 fusion was identified in one case, demonstrating unique morphology compared to cases with the more common WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion. All tumours expressed typical endothelial markers CD31, ERG, and CD34 and were negative for pan-cytokeratin. Cases with a WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion displayed high expression of CAMTA1 and the single case with a YAP1::TFE3 fusion displayed high expression of TFE3. Survival was highly variable and unrelated to molecular profile. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of EHE cases provides molecular and histopathological characterisation and matching clinical information that emphasises the molecular patterns and variable clinical outcomes and adds to our knowledge of this ultra-rare cancer. Such information from multiple studies will advance our understanding, potentially improving treatment options.

MYB RNA detection by in situ hybridisation has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is one of the most common primary salivary gland cancers. ACC has several benign and malignant mimics amongst salivary gland neoplasms. An accurate diagnosis of ACC is essential for optimal management of the patients and their follow-up. Upregulation of MYB has been described in 85-90% of ACC, but not in other salivary gland neoplasms. In ACC, MYB upregulation can occur as a result of a genetic rearrangement t(6;9) (q22-23;p23-24), MYB copy number variation (CNV), or enhancer hijacking of MYB. All mechanisms of MYB upregulation result in increased RNA transcription that can be detected using RNA in situ hybridisation (ISH) methods. In this study, utilising 138 primary salivary gland neoplasms including 78 ACC, we evaluate the diagnostic utility of MYB RNA ISH for distinguishing ACC from other primary salivary gland neoplasms with a prominent cribriform architecture including pleomorphic adenoma, basal cell adenoma, basal cell adenocarcinoma, epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma, and polymorphous adenocarcinoma. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation and next generation sequencing were also performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of RNA ISH for detecting increased MYB RNA when MYB gene alterations were present. Detection of MYB RNA has 92.3% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity for a diagnosis of ACC amongst salivary gland neoplasms. The sensitivity of MYB RNA detection by ISH (92.3%) is significantly higher than that of the FISH MYB break-apart probe (42%) for ACC. Next generation sequencing did not demonstrate MYB alterations in cases that lacked MYB RNA overexpression indicating high sensitivity of MYB RNA ISH for detecting MYB gene alterations. The possibility that the sensitivity may be higher in clinical practice with contemporary samples as compared with older retrospective tissue samples with RNA degradation is not entirely excluded. In addition to the high sensitivity and specificity, MYB RNA testing can be performed using standard IHC platforms and protocols and evaluated using brightfield microscopy making it a time and cost-efficient diagnostic tool in routine clinical practice.

Left cheek sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma and development of isolated free flap donor site metastasis.

Rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare mesenchymal malignancy with four different morphological subtypes: alveolar, embryonal, pleomorphic and spindle cell/sclerosing. It is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of children and adolescents but occurs less commonly in adults. We describe a male patient in his 20s with sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma of the left cheek who developed an isolated free flap donor site metastasis in the first instance but subsequently progressed with bilateral pulmonary metastases. Multidisciplinary team involvement in a sarcoma specialist centre is essential and collaboration between the pathologist, radiologist, head and neck surgeon, orthopaedic surgeon, radiation oncologist and medical oncologist were integral in providing optimal management in this patient. Furthermore, this case report highlights this phenomenon of implantation metastasis in a patient with rhabdomyosarcoma, and emphasises the importance of surgical barriers between the resection and reconstruction teams in an oncological case.

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

This study aims to identify prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to improve the current 8th edition TNM classification. A systematic review of the literature reported between 2013 and 2019 in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted. Studies were included if (1) original clinical studies, (2) ≥50 NPC patients, and (3) analyses on the association between prognostic factors and overall survival. The data elements of eligible studies were abstracted and analyzed. A level of evidence was synthesized for each suggested change to the TNM staging and prognostic factors. Of 5,595 studies screened, 108 studies (44 studies on anatomical criteria and 64 on non-anatomical factors) were selected. Proposed changes/factors with strong evidence included the upstaging paranasal sinus to T4, defining parotid lymph node as N3, upstaging N-category based on presence of lymph node necrosis, as well as the incorporation of non-TNM factors including EBV-DNA level, primary gross tumor volume (GTV), nodal GTV, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, platelet count, SUVmax of the primary tumor, and total lesion glycolysis. This systematic review provides a useful summary of suggestions and prognostic factors that potentially improve the current staging system. Further validation studies are warranted to confirm their significance.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Currently, approved first-line treatment options of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) include (1) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, ADT plus one of the following: (2) docetaxel, (3) abiraterone, (4) enzalutamide, and (5) apalutamide. The high cost of novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors warrants an understanding of the combinations' value by considering both efficacy and cost. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of these five treatment options in mHSPC from the US payer perspective to guide treatment sequence. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime cost and effectiveness of these five first-line treatment options for mHSPC using outcomes data from published literature. Health outcomes were measured in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Drug costs were obtained from the Veterans Affairs Pharmaceutical Catalog. We extrapolated survival beyond closure of the trials. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Life-years, QALYs, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated. Univariable, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate parameter uncertainty. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$100,000 per QALY was used. RESULTS: Compared to ADT alone, docetaxel plus ADT provided a 0.28 QALY gain at an ICER of US$12,870 per QALY. Abiraterone plus ADT provided an additional 1.70 QALYs against docetaxel plus ADT, with an ICER of US$38,897 per QALY. Compared to abiraterone plus ADT, enzalutamide plus ADT provided an additional 0.87 QALYs at an ICER of US$509,813 per QALY. Apalutamide plus ADT was strongly dominated by enzalutamide plus ADT. Given the WTP threshold of US$100,000 per QALY, abiraterone plus ADT represented high-value health care. CONCLUSIONS: Abiraterone plus ADT is the preferred treatment option for men with mHSPC at a WTP threshold of US$100,000 per QALY.

A critical analysis of the 8th edition TNM staging for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases and comparison to N1S3 stage and ITEM risk score: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We performed a critical analysis of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with nodal metastases and compared the performance to the N1S3 and ITEM systems. METHODS: Multicenter study of 990 patients with metastatic HNcSCC treated with curative intent. The end points of interest were disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Model fit was evaluated using Harrell's Concordance Index (C-index), proportion of variation explained (PVE), Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. RESULTS: N1S3 and ITEM demonstrated good distribution into risk categories in contrast to the AJCC system, which classified the majority (90.6%) of patients as N2-3 and Stage IV due to the high rate of extranodal extension. The N2c and N3a categories appeared redundant. There was considerable discordance between systems in risk allocation on an individual patient basis. N1S3 was the best performed (DSS: C-index 0.62, PVE 10.9%; OS: C-index 0.59, PVE 4.5%), albeit with relatively poor predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC N category and tumor node metastasis stage have poor patient distribution and predictive performance in HNcSCC. The AJCC stage, N1S3, and ITEM score all provide limited prognostic information based on objective measures highlighting the need to develop a staging system specific to HNcSCC.

NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry is highly specific for the diagnosis of mesenchymal chondrosarcomas: experience in the Australian population.

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) is a rare sarcoma that typically arises in adolescents and young adults and characteristically harbours a HEY1-NCOA2 gene fusion. A recent study has shown that NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is highly specific and sensitive in MCs. NKX3.1 is a nuclear marker expressed in prostatic tissue and is widely used in most laboratories to determine prostatic origin of metastatic tumours. In the current study we investigated whether this stain can be used in the diagnostic workup of MC, as it may assist in triaging cases for further molecular testing, by assessing its expression in a cohort of MCs and in a wide spectrum of sarcoma types. Furthermore, we aimed to elucidate if expression of NKX3.1 by MCs is related to androgen receptor (AR) expression. We identified NKX3.1 positive nuclear staining in 9 of 12 individual patients of MC (n=20 of 25 samples when taking into account separate episodes). Four of the five negative specimens had been previously subjected to acid-based decalcification. NKX3.1 was negative in 536 samples from 16 non-MC sarcomas derived from largely tissue microarrays (TMAs). Overall, we identified 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity for NKX3.1 IHC in MCs. The sensitivity increased to 95.2% when acid-based decalcified specimens were excluded from the analysis. No correlation between NKX3.1 expression and AR IHC was identified. In summary, our findings indicate that NKX3.1 nuclear positivity is highly sensitive and specific for MC, provided that ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based rather than acid-based decalcification is used for sample processing. NKX3.1 IHC in the right clinical and histopathological setting can potentially be sufficient for the diagnosis of MC, reserving molecular confirmation only for equivocal cases.

PD-1 blockade using pembrolizumab in adolescent and young adult patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas represent 10%-15% of cancers in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients, and survival for those with metastatic disease or relapse is poor. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition has improved outcomes in multiple tumor types, but data in advanced sarcomas, particularly within the AYA population, are limited. AIM: We aim to evaluate response and toxicity for AYA patients with sarcoma treated with pembrolizumab. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed AYA patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma who received self-funded pembrolizumab between May 2015 and January 2019. Eighteen patients were identified. One patient with Ewing sarcoma had a sustained complete response to therapy. Two patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma received a clinical benefit from pembrolizumab: one had a radiological partial response with an excellent clinical response and one patient achieved stable disease. Four patients died of disease prior to first scheduled assessment and thus were not evaluable. The remaining eleven patients had progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The role of immunotherapy in AYA sarcoma warrants further investigation. Biomarkers of response need to be further evaluated in order to guide patient selection.

Prognostic value of the 8th edition American Joint Commission Cancer nodal staging system for patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (AJCC8) introduced a separate staging system for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) which parallels mucosal SCC and incorporates extranodal extension (ENE). This study aims to evaluate its prognostic utility. METHODS: Univariate analysis of 1146 patients with metastatic HNcSCC from four Australian cancer centers was performed according to both AJCC 7th (AJCC7) and the 8th editions. RESULTS: AJCC8 increased classification of 924 (80.6%) patients to either pN2a or pN3b and 341 patients (29.8%) from stage III to IV compared to AJCC7. The disease-specific survival (DSS) was not significantly different between pN1, pN2 or pN3a categories per AJCC8. Estimates of model performance for the AJCC8 pN staging revealed modest predictive capacity (Harrell's C of 0.62 for DSS). CONCLUSIONS: The risk stratification according to pN classification of AJCC8 staging system performed poorly as a prognostic indicator.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for metastatic head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional study of within-stage heterogeneity and impact on prognostic performance.

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) stratifies risk poorly. We hypothesized that this results from prognostic heterogeneity within N and TNM groups. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of disease-specific survival (DSS) in a multicenter study of 1146 patients with nodal metastases from HNcSCC. RESULTS: The majority of patients were classified as pN2a or pN3b (83.1%) and TNM stage IV (90.6%). On multivariate analysis, there was statistically significant prognostic heterogeneity within these groups based on the number and size of nodal metastases, immunosuppression, and perineural invasion. When stage IV patients were categorized into low, moderate, and high-risk groups based on adverse features, there was wide variation in prognosis with 5-year DSS ranging from 90% to 60% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC staging system stratifies risk poorly in HNcSCC due to significant prognostic heterogeneity within pN2a, pN3b, and stage IV groups.

Number of nodal metastases and the American Joint Committee on cancer staging of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine if the number of nodal metastases is an independent predictor of survival in HNcSCC, whether it provides additional prognostic information to the AJCC N and TNM stage and identify optimal cut-points for risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of patients with parotid and/or cervical nodal metastases from HNcSCC treated with curative intent by surgery ±â€¯adjuvant therapy. The impact of number of nodal metastases on disease-specific and overall survival was assessed using multivariate Cox regression. Optimal cut-points for prognostic discrimination modelled using the AIC, BIC, C-index and PVE. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1128 patients, with 962 (85.3%) males, median age of 72.9 years (range: 18-100 years) and median follow-up 3.4 years. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 946 (83.9%) patients. Based on objective measures of model performance, number of nodal metastases was classified as 1-2 (N = 816), 3-4 (N = 162) and ≥5 (N = 150) nodes. In multivariate analyses, the risk of disease-specific mortality progressively increased with 3-4 nodes (HR, 1.58; 95% CI: 1.03-2.42; p = 0.036) and ≥5 nodes (HR, 2.91; 95% CI: 1.99-4.25; p < 0.001) with similar results for all-cause mortality. This simple categorical variable provided superior prognostic information to the TNM stage. CONCLUSION: Increasing number of nodal metastases is an independent predictor of mortality in HNcSCC, with categorization as 1-2, 3-4 and ≥5 nodes optimizing risk stratification and providing superior prognostic information to TNM stage. These findings may aid in the development of future staging systems as well as identification of high-risk patients in clinical trials.

Molecular patterns in salivary duct carcinoma identify prognostic subgroups.

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDCa) is a rare cancer with high rate of metastases and poor survival despite aggressive multimodality treatment. This study analyzes the genetic changes in SDCa, their impact on cancer pathways, and evaluates whether molecular patterns can identify subgroups with distinct clinical characteristics and outcome. Clinicopathologic details and tissue samples from 66 patients (48 males, 18 females) treated between 1995 and 2018 were obtained from multiple institutions. Androgen receptor (AR) was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and the Illumina TruSight 170 gene panel was used for DNA sequencing. Male gender, lympho-vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and smoking were significant predictors of disease-free survival. AR was present in 79%. Frequently encountered alterations were mutations in TP53 (51%), PIK3CA (32%) and HRAS (22%), as well as amplifications of CDK4/6 (22%), ERBB2 (21%), MYC (16%), and deletions of CDKN2A (13%). TP53 mutation and MYC amplifications were associated with decreased disease-free survival. Analysis of cancer pathways revealed that the PI3K pathway was most commonly affected. Alterations in the cell cycle pathway were associated with impaired disease-free survival (HR 2.6, P = 0.038). Three subgroups based on AR and ERBB2 status were identified, which featured distinct molecular patterns and outcome. Among AR positive SDCa, HRAS mutations were restricted to AR positive tumors without ERBB2 amplification and HRAS mutations featured high co-occurrence with PIK3CA alterations, which seems specific to SDCa. AR negative SDCa were associated with poor disease-free survival in multivariate analysis (HR 4.5, P = 0.010) and none of these tumors exhibited ERBB2 amplification or HRAS mutations. AR and ERBB2 status in SDCa thus classifies tumors with distinct molecular profiles relevant to future targeted therapy. Furthermore, clinical factors such as smoking and molecular features such as MYC amplification may serve as markers of poor prognosis of SDCa.

Positive survival trend in metastatic head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma over four-decades: Multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed changes over time of survival of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with lymph node metastases. METHODS: A multicenter analysis of 1301 patients with metastatic HNcSCC treated between 1980 and 2017. Differences in disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) by decade were assessed using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: Over the study period, we noted an increase in the proportion of patients aged over 80 years (3.9%-31.7%; P < .001) and immunosuppression (1.9%-9.9%; P = .03). After adjusting for number and size of metastatic nodes, extranodal extension, perineural invasion, immunosuppression, treatment, and institution, there was a reduction in risk of cancer-related mortality from 0.47 in 1990-1999 (P = .04) to 0.30 in 2000-2009 (P < .001) when compared to 1980-1989. This remained stable at 0.30 in 2010-2017 (P = .001). OS remained stable after 1990. CONCLUSION: Despite an aging and more frequently immunosuppressed population, fewer patients are dying from metastatic HNcSCC.

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology-Proposed modifications to improve clinical utility.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration of a salivary gland lesion is a well-established diagnostic procedure that aids management decisions. Recently, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) classification has been proposed in order to improve the reproducibility and communication in the management of salivary gland lesions. METHODS: A total of 375 patient's cytological reports collected between January 2010 and December 2017 were reviewed and reclassified according to MSRSGC and a risk of malignancy was calculated for each of the category. RESULTS: The rate of malignancy in MSRSGC classification was 19.0%, 11.8%, 25.0%, 5.5%, 50.0%, 71.4%, and 94.6% for each of the category (I, II, III, IVa, IVb, V, and VI), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MSRSGC classification is a valuable tool in everyday practice. The modified version of MSRSGC aims to improve the surgical relevance and facilitate uniform management.