Computed tomography or contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for follow-up of liver metastases after Cyberknife therapy?: A prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) allows the study of vascularization of secondary liver lesions. The Cyberknife (Accuray, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) is a therapeutic method that allows a tumor target to be subjected to a high radiant dose gradient. This prospective pilot study aimed to demonstrate the concordance of CEUS versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in determining the stability or disease progression of secondary liver lesions after treatment with the Cyberknife. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were consecutively enrolled, and 3 different operators evaluated the CEUS images and the intermodality concordance with CECT. All patients received CEUS at 1 and 2 months after the Cyberknife therapy. The intermodality agreement was evaluated by the Cohen κ coefficient and a multivariate analysis according to the method of Janson and Olsson (Educ Psychol Meas 2001; 61:277-289). RESULTS: Forty secondary liver lesions were detected and treated. Forty-one CECT and 51 CEUS examinations were performed without any adverse events in the 24 patients. The intermodality agreement rates, calculated for the operators as Cohen κ values, were κ = 1.00, 0.881, and 0.767, respectively. The multivariate analysis of intermodality agreement showed an almost perfect value (ι = 0.841). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found excellent diagnostic correspondence between CEUS and CECT in the evaluation of local disease stability or progression after Cyberknife therapy in liver metastases. These findings suggest that CEUS could play an important role in the surveillance of these patients because of its high accuracy and reproducibility, thus reducing the need for CECT.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided fiducial marker placement for liver cancer robotic stereotactic radio-surgery treatment: A comparative analysis of three types of markers and needles.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Percutaneous placement of fiducial markers is required to perform stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver neoplastic lesions. This prospective trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous ultrasound-guided placement of three different types of markers in patients with liver cancer referred for SBRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent percutaneous ultrasound-guided implantation of a fiducial marker in the liver. Three sizes of needles were used: 25 gauge (G), 22G, and 17G. The 25G and 22G needles contained gold anchor markers of 0.28×10mm and 0.4 ×10mm size, respectively. In contrast, the 17G needle contained a gold grain marker of 1×4mm. Each patient received 1-6 markers, depending on lesion size and numbers. Technical feasibility and the occurrence of adverse events were registered. Computed tomography scans were acquired prior to SBRT to evaluate the location, visibility, or complications related to the markers. RESULTS: A total of 163 needles were used to deliver 163 markers in 50 patients. No major complications occurred. Minor complication occurrence rate was 12%. The total complication occurrence for all type of markers was 8.5%. No complications were observed with the use of the gold anchor marker of 0.4 ×10mm size. Variance analysis of the three markers showed a significant difference in the frequency of complications amongst the three markers (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ultrasound-guided placement of fiducial markers for SBRT of liver neoplastic lesions is safe and feasible. In our series, the 22G needle showed some advantage in terms of handling and safety when compared with the 25G and 17G needles. In addition, the gold anchor marker of 0.4 ×10mm size displayed a lower percentage of displacement.

Safety profile of methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate, which was initially developed in 1948 for the treatment of leukemia, is known to be an immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drug. It has been widely used for over 60 years as both a low and high-dose therapy in chronic inflammatory diseases. The aim of this review was to analyze and summarize the available data specifically on the safety of this drug in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. AREAS COVERED: A structured search of articles was conducted using the PubMed database up to April 2016. All articles in English with isolated or combined keywords were included according to their relevance to the aims of this study. EXPERT OPINION: Numerous of studies have established the efficacy of parenteral methotrexate in the management of steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant Crohn's disease, either for inducing or maintaining remission. However, its efficacy in ulcerative colitis has not been properly investigated. Additionally, methotrexate has been shown to reduce the effect of immunization with anti-TNF agents when combined. The drug has potential advantages over thiopurines such as its weekly administration, a possible shorter time of action, low cost, decreased risk for malignancy and overall a comparable safety profile.

The genetic burden of inflammatory bowel diseases: implications for the clinic?

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which include Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation. Their etiology is multifactorial, with complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors, which are still largely unclear. Areas covered: The influence of genetics is clearly demonstrated by important epidemiological data, including familial aggregation and concordance in twins. In 2001, the first genetic susceptibility gene for IBD, the NOD2 gene, was identified. Currently, thanks to genetic wide association studies, over 200 susceptibility genetic markers are know. Expert commentary: However, clinically highly relevant gene associations are still very limited and the usefulness of these information in the current clinical strategies for treatment and surveillance of IBD is weak. Nevertheless, the recent identification of some genetic risk variants has clarified some newbiological pathways of these diseases thus paving the way for the discoveries in the near future of new targeted therapies.