Hounsfield Unit-Calculated Bone Mineral Density Loss Following Combat-Related Lower Extremity Amputations.

BACKGROUND: After combat-related lower extremity amputations, patients rapidly lose bone mineral density (BMD). As serial dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans are rarely performed in this setting, it is difficult to determine the timeline for bone loss and recovery or the role of interventions. However, a strong correlation has been demonstrated between DXA BMD and computed tomography (CT) signal attenuation. We sought to leverage multiple CT scans obtained after trauma to develop a predictive model for BMD after combat-related lower extremity amputations. METHODS: We reviewed amputations performed within the United States military between 2003 and 2016 in patients with multiple CT scans. We collected pertinent clinical information, including amputation level(s), complications, and time to weight-bearing. The primary outcome measure was the development of low BMD, estimated in Hounsfield units (HU) from CT scans with use of a previously validated method. One hundred and twenty-eight patients with 613 femoral neck CT scans were available for analysis. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the effects of modifiable and non-modifiable variables on BMD. A random-effects model was applied to determine which factors were most predictive of low BMD and to quantify their effects. RESULTS: Both amputated and non-amputated extremities demonstrated substantial BMD loss, which stabilized approximately 3 years after the injury. Loss of BMD followed a logarithmic pattern, stabilizing after 1,000 days. On average, amputated limbs lost approximately 100 HU of BMD after 1,000 days. Other factors identified by the mixed-effects model included nonambulatory status (-33.5 HU), age at injury (-3.4 HU per year), surgical complications delaying weight-bearing (-21.3 HU), transtibial amputation (20.9 HU), and active vitamin-D treatment (-19.7 HU). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with combat-related lower extremity amputations experience an initially rapid decline in BMD in both intact and amputated limbs as a result of both modifiable and non-modifiable influences, including time to walking, amputation level, surgical complications, and age. The paradoxical association of vitamin-D supplementation with lower HU likely reflects this treatment being assigned to patients with low BMD. This model may assist with clinical decision-making prior to performing lower extremity amputation and also may assist providers with postoperative decision-making to optimize management for prophylaxis against osteoporosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Glenoid Bone Loss Pattern in Patients With Posterior Instability Versus Anterior Instability: A Matched Cohort Study.

Background: The pattern of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in anterior glenohumeral instability is well described. It was recognized recently that posterior GBL after instability has a posteroinferior pattern. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare GBL patterns in a matched cohort of patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. The hypothesis was that the GBL pattern in posterior instability would be more inferior than the GBL pattern in anterior instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 28 patients with posterior instability were matched with 28 patients with anterior instability by age, sex and number of instability events. GBL location was defined using a clockface model. Obliquity was defined as the angle between the long axis of the glenoid and a line tangent to the GBL. Superior and inferior GBL were measured as areas and defined relative to the equator. The primary outcome was the 2-dimensional characterization of posterior versus anterior GBL. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the posterior GBL patterns in traumatic and atraumatic instability mechanisms in an expanded cohort of 42 patients. Results: The mean age of the matched cohorts (n = 56) was 25.2 ± 9.87 years. The median obliquity of GBL was 27.53° (interquartile range [IQR], 18.83°-47.38°) in the posterior cohort and 9.28° (IQR, 6.68°-15.75°) in the anterior cohort (P < .001). The mean superior-to-inferior bone loss ratio was 0.48 ± 0.51 in the posterior cohort and 0.80 ± 0.55 (P = .032) in the anterior cohort. In the expanded posterior instability cohort (n = 42), patients with traumatic injury mechanism (n = 22), had a similar GBL obliquity compared to patients with an atraumatic injury mechanism (n = 20) (mean, 27.73° [95% CI, 20.26°-35.20°] vs 32.20° [95% CI, 21.27°-43.14°], respectively) (P = .49). Conclusion: Posterior GBL occurred more inferiorly and at an increased obliquity compared with anterior GBL. This pattern is consistent for traumatic and atraumatic posterior GBL. Bone loss along the equator may not be the most reliable predictor of posterior instability, and critical bone loss may be reached more rapidly than a model of loss along the equator may predict.

Modified Broström With and Without Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review.

The Modified Broström has become the gold standard for operative management of chronic lateral ankle instability. Despite overall good clinical outcomes with this procedure, recent biomechanical data have called into question the strength and durability of this technique. Accordingly, the addition of suture tape to the Modified Broström construct has been described in an attempt to more closely recreate the natural biomechanical properties of the ankle lateral ligament complex. We performed a systematic review of the literature was using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to identify English-language articles from 2009 to present discussing outcomes with the augmented Modified Broström technique. A total of 4 studies (2 retrospective cohort studies, 2 case series) involving 156 patients with Modified Broström with augmentation met inclusion criteria. Average follow-up time was 13.8 months. Of the 3 studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures both pre- and postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in all measures (p < .05). Two studies compared the Modified Broström directly with and without augmentation, one of which found a statistically significant difference in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in favor of the augmentation group (93.1 vs 90.5, p = .027), while American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was not significantly different (p > .05) between the 2 procedures across studies. There were no significant differences in complications between techniques. Modified Broström with suture tape augmentation for chronic lateral ankle instability can produce good short-term clinical outcomes with few complications, comparable to the Modified Broström alone.

Reliability of the Walter Reed Classification for Heterotopic Ossification Severity in Amputees.

OBJECTIVE: At this time, there is no validated tool for describing heterotopic ossification (HO) severity or measuring efficacy of therapies after amputation. This study aims to validate the Walter Reed classification system for reliable characterization of HO burden in residual limbs. DESIGN: Descriptive, Level IV. SETTING: US Military Trauma Referral Center. STUDY POPULATION: Five orthopaedic surgeon raters with varying experience levels assessed orthogonal radiographs of 100 randomly selected residual upper and lower limbs after combat-related amputation. INTERVENTION: A standardized education session on the Walter Reed HO classification system followed by 2 grading sessions, separated by a 2-week waiting period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores were analyzed for interobserver and intraobserver reliability using weighted Cohen's kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Krippendorff's alpha for ordinal variables. RESULTS: After the waiting period, 89% of HO was rated the same by observers with an intraobserver kappa = 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.92). Interobserver reliability was evaluated using group-wise comparison among observers, resulting in an overall Krippendorff's alpha = 0.78 (95% CI 0.76-0.80). Using intraclass correlation coefficient, interrater consistency was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The Walter Reed HO classification system is substantially reliable for use by raters with any level of orthopaedic training. In addition, it is reliable for evaluation of both through bone and disarticulation type amputations in the upper and lower extremities. However, in 11% of cases, a secondary read may vary, suggesting that this system is useful for understanding HO and developing interventions but may benefit from further refinement, including advanced imaging and clinical correlation.

Definitive External Fixation for Anterior Stabilization of Combat-related Pelvic Ring Injuries, With or Without Sacroiliac Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Combat-related pelvic ring injuries frequently lead to placement of a temporizing external fixation device for early resuscitation and transport. These injuries are commonly complicated by concomitant polytrauma and extensive soft-tissue injuries, which may preclude early internal fixation and lead to prolonged use of external fixation. To date, few studies have reported on the outcomes of definitive external fixation for combat-related pelvic ring injuries. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) In patients treated with definitive external fixation after combat-related pelvic ring injuries, how often is the quality of reduction within radiographically acceptable parameters at the end of treatment? (2) What proportion of patients demonstrate local heterotopic ossification after these injuries? (3) What patient- and treatment-related factors are associated with increased complications and pain? METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients with pelvic ring injuries treated at a tertiary military referral center from January 2003 to December 2012. In total, 114 patients were identified, 55 of whom maintained an external fixation frame throughout their treatment. During that time, the general indications for definitive external fixation were an open, contaminated pelvic ring injury with a high risk of infection or open urologic injury; confluent abdominal, perineal, and thigh wounds; or comminution of the pubic ramus that would necessitate plate fixation extending up the anterior column in patients with open abdomen or exposure-compromising abdominal wounds. Posterior fixation, either sacroiliac or lumbopelvic, was applied in patients with sacroiliac instability. Of the 55 patients with pelvic ring injuries treated with definitive external fixation (27 open and 28 closed), four underwent hemipelvectomy and construct removal for massive ascending infections and four were lost to follow-up, leaving 47 patients (85%) who were available at a minimum follow-up of 12 months (median 29 months, interquartile range 17-43 months). All 47 patients underwent serial imaging to assess their injury and reduction during treatment. External fixators were typically removed after 12 weeks, except in patients in whom pin-site irritation or infection prompted earlier removal, and all were confirmed to be grossly stable during an examination under anesthesia. Clinical union was defined as the absence of radiographically present fracture lines and stable examination findings under anesthesia when the external fixator was removed. Data on demographics, injury pattern, associated injuries, revision procedures, complications, and final functional outcomes including ambulation status, sexual function, and pain were collected. Pelvic radiographs were reviewed for the initial injury pattern, type of pelvic fixation construct, residual displacement after removal of the frame, and evidence of formation of heterotopic ossification in the pelvis or bilateral hips. Pelvic displacement and diastasis were determined by digital caliper measurement on plain images; malunion was defined as anterior diastasis of the pelvis or vertical incongruity of the hemipelvis greater than 10 mm. RESULTS: Radiographic malunion after construct removal occurred in eight of 24 patients with open injuries and in five of 23 patients with closed injuries. Heterotopic ossification developed in the pelvis or hips of all 24 patients with open injuries and in two of the 23 patients with closed injuries. In patients with open pelvic ring injuries, concomitant acetabular fractures were associated with pelvic pain at the final follow-up examination (risk ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.5; p = 0.017). No treatment factor resulted in superior functional outcomes. In the closed-injury group, concomitant lower-extremity amputation was associated with improved radiographic final reduction (RR 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7; p = 0.02). There was no association between radiographic malunion and increased pain (RR 1.9; 95% CI, 0.5-7.0; p = 0.54 for the open group; RR 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-1.0; p = 0.86 for the closed group). CONCLUSION: In this series of patients with severe combat-related pelvic ring injuries who were treated anteriorly with definitive external fixation because of a severe soft-tissue injury, high infection risk, or unacceptable physiologic cost of internal fixation, malunion and chronic pelvic pain were less common than previously observed. Prior studies primarily differ in their lack of sacroiliac or lumbopelvic stabilization for posteriorly unstable fracture patterns, likely accounting for much of these differences. There may have been important between-study differences such as extremely severe injuries, concomitant injuries, and study population. Our study also differs because we specifically analyzed a large cohort of patients who sustained open pelvic ring injuries. Future studies should prospectively investigate the ideal construct type and pin material, optimize the length of treatment and assessment of healing, and improve radiographic measures to predict long-term functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.