Appraisal of trimester-specific fetal heart rate and its role in gestational age prediction.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate and report normal sonographic FHR values among low-risk singleton women across the three trimesters of pregnancy and determine FHR role in gestational age prediction. METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study of 2727 low-risk singleton pregnant women was undertaken. FHR measurements were obtained by a consultant radiologist and three experienced sonographers using transabdominal approach from January 2019 to December 2020. Two FHR measurements were taken for each participant. The fetal lie and presentation were also documented in the first trimester. Data were analysed using SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). RESULT: The maternal mean ± SD age was 25.8 ± 6.5 years and mean FHR for first, second and third trimesters were 151 ± 16, 145 ± 6 and 125±6 bpm respectively. The mean ± SD gestational age were 10 ± 2, 19 ± 3 and 34 ± 2 weeks for the first, second and third trimester respectively. Using ANOVA, there were statistically significant differences in FHR across the three trimesters (p ≤ 0.05). A positive correlation existed between maternal age and FHR (r = 0.57, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study has established normal values for FHR in first, second and third trimester respectively. Referring physicians, radiologists, sonographers, obstetricians and gynaecologists may consider FHR of (135-167) bpm (139-151) bpm and (119-131) bpm as normal FHR ranges for the first, second and third trimester respectively. This study has also revealed the possibility of gestational age prediction using FHR with the equation [Gestational Age = 87.8 - (0.47) FHR]. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This paper provides the most up-to-date sonographic FHR recommendations for fetal management. More importantly, findings from this study also suggests that ultrasound practitioners can use FHR measurements as a reliable alternative for fetal dating.

Impact of ultrasound scanning on pregnant Women's compliance with attendance at antenatal care visits and supervised delivery at primary healthcare centres in northern Nigeria: Initial experiences.

INTRODUCTION: The world health organisation (WHO) recommends at least one ultrasound scan amidst eight antenatal care visits, however, most pregnant women in low and middle-income countries do not achieve this. This study aims to assess the impact of limited obstetrics ultrasound (LOUS) within primary healthcare centres in northern Nigeria. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted across selected primary healthcare centres in Bauchi and Kano States (northern Nigeria). The study protocol was approved by the Ministry of Health in each State. Within each State a total of nine primary healthcare centres were randomly selected. Information on all complete antenatal care (ANC) records of women who used the primary healthcare facility for 12 months prior to introduction of ultrasound (January 2016 to December 2016) and 12 months after (January 2018 to December 2018) were collected. Study data were analysed using descriptive (mean, standard deviations) and inferential statistics. Independent sample t-test were used to find out if there was a statistical difference between the pre and post-intervention data on women compliance to ANC visits, facility based delivery, maternal and child mortality. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences and significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of ANC visits and supervised facility delivery after introduction of ultrasound services (LOUS) in the primary healthcare centres. The number of ANC visits in Kano State was 2637.6 ± 972.0 before and 3793.0 ± 517.5 after the introduction of ultrasound services. The number of ANC visits in Bauchi State was 1866.6 ± 488.3 before and 2854.0 ± 631.3 after the introduction of ultrasound services. The number of supervised facility deliveries in Kano state was 520.1 ± 128.7 before and 1021.1 ± 217.0 after the introduction of LOUS. The number of supervised facility deliveries for Bauchi state was 553.1 ± 309.9 before and 1056.3 ± 295.4 after introduction of LOUS. A total of 2486 (11.0%) women were referred for further imaging due to equivocal ultrasound findings. A total of 2185 (9.7%) pregnant women were referred for appropriate care due to multiple gestations. CONCLUSION: This study found that LOUS, in resource scarce settings, has the potential of improving ANC visits, facility delivery rates and reduce maternal and child mortality. It also leads to change in patient management plans resulting in referrals for appropriate care. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Technological interventions using ultrasound have the potential to motivate pregnant women to attend ANC, give birth in a healthcare facility and thus reduce maternal and child morbidity and mortality. This is in line with the global drive to reduce maternal and child death by 2030 to less than 70 maternal deaths in 100,000 live births and neonatal mortality reduction to 12 in 1000 live births and under 5 mortality reduction to 25 in 1000 live births.

Achieving universal access to obstetric ultrasound in resource constrained settings: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: The potential benefits and challenges of achieving universal access to obstetric ultrasound services in resource constrained settings were reviewed, with a view to making some recommendations to address the huge burden of avoidable maternal and child morbidity and mortality. KEY FINDINGS: In most resource-poor settings of the world, antenatal ultrasound is available only to a privileged few in urban centres, while the majority of the population living in rural areas have little or no access to diagnostic imaging services. There is also the extreme shortage of sonographers and doctors with specialist training in sonography. A comprehensive regulation must be put in place to achieve maximum benefits and to ensure quality assurance; appropriate use and application of ethics and training must be comprehensive. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound service provision, in resource-scarce settings, has the potential to improve access and quality of health care services in areas like the point of care ultrasound service provision and in the fields of obstetrics and gynaecology. A comprehensive regulation must be put in place to achieve maximum benefits and to ensure quality assurance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Making ultrasound technology available and affordable in resource scare settings has the potential to improve access to diagnostic imaging services and reduce avoidable maternal and child death in resource constrained settings.