Real-world treatment patterns and survival for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The "real world" treatment mode and clinical efficacy of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) are unclear. Meanwhile, the role of immunotherapy in the clinical practice is also puzzling. We conducted the research to investigate the statue of "real world" LAESCC. The clinical data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma which met the criteria from January 2010 to December 2019 have been retrospectively analyzed, and the distribution of clinical treatment patterns has been analyzed. They cover such aspects as dfferences in survival time and further analysis of the differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who received immunotherapy and those who did not receive immunotherapy. What is more, Cox risk regression model has also been used to evaluate the risk factors affecting the prognosis of LAESCC. The cases of a total of 5328 newly diagnosed patients with esophageal cancer were collected, and a total of 363 patients were included in the study, with a median age of (46.2 ± 7.8) years old; 84 (23.1%) and 279 (76.9%) patients received 1L and ≥ 2L, respectively; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (74.1%) and paclitaxel combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (14.3%) were the main first-line treatment options; fluorouracil combined with cisplatin regimen-based chemotherapy (63.8%) was the main treatment option for ≥ 2L, of which 69 patients (25.3%) received immunization treatment; OS of patients with 1 line of therapy and ≥ 2L were (22.4 ± 7.2) months and (38.7 ± 8.5) months, respectively, and the comparison between groups was statistically significant (P < .05); among 69 patients with ≥ 2L who received immunotherapy, PFS and The OS was (14.6 ± 6.9) and (45.3 ± 9.7) respectively, and the comparison between the groups was statistically significant (all P < .05). Cox multivariate analysis has shown that clinical stage, immunotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and ≥ 2L are the main factors affecting OS. and immunotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and ≥ 2L are independent factors affecting PFS. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is currently one of the standard treatments for LAESCC, and most patients are still willing to receive second-line or above treatments. Adding immunotherapy to standard treatment modalities may further optimize clinical treatment modalities and improve patient outcomes.

Treating the primary in low burden metastatic prostate cancer: Where do we stand?

ABSTRACT: On the basis of endocrine therapy for patients with low burden metastatic prostate cancer (LBMP), the clinical efficacy and quality of life were compared between prostate-only directed radiotherapy (PODT) and prostate and metastasis radiotherapy (PMRT).From November 2009 to November 2015, total 91 patients newly diagnosed with LBMP were retrospectively analyzed, of which 52 patients received PODT and 39 patients received PMRT. The biochemical failure free interval (IBF), prostate specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) time were compared between the 2 groups, and expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) scale was used to evaluate the difference in quality of life between the 2 groups.The median IBF of the PODT group was 31 months, which was significantly lower than the 39 months of the PMRT group (P < .05); the 5-year OS and PCSS were 58.9%, 65.3% in PODT group, and 58.9%, 71.79% in PMRT group, respectively. There was no significant between the 2 groups (P > .05); the side effects of acute radiotherapy in PMRT group were significantly higher than PODT group (P < .05), especially in bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reactions; The scores of urinary system function and intestinal system function in PMRT group were significantly higher than PODT group at the end of radiotherapy, 3 months after radiotherapy, and 6 months after radiotherapy (P < .05). The score of sexual function in PMRT group was significantly lower than that in PODT group after radiotherapy (P < .05), and higher than that in PORT group at other follow-up time points (P < .05). The hormone function was decreased at each follow-up time point in 2 groups, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05).Patients with LBMP receiving PMRT can improve IBF, but cannot increase PCSS and OS, and increase the incidence of acute radiation injury.

Does brain radiotherapy improve survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with brain metastasis?

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical characteristics, influencing factors, and their impact on survival in patients with brain metastases from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BM-ESCC). METHODS: A total of 67 patients with patients with newly diagnosed BM-ESCC were retrospectively analyzed from December 2000 to December 2016, in order to examine the correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and brain metastases, and between brain metastases and survival. RESULTS: The number of BM-ESCC was positively correlated with T and N stages (P<0.05). The higher the T and N stages, the higher the incidence. The median survival time was 9.65 months. N stage was an independent risk factor for BM-ESCC. N0 + N1 was associated with a lower risk of brain metastases (P<0.05). Patients with 1 brain metastasis had a significantly longer survival than those with 2 and 3 brain metastases. N stage-stratified analysis revealed that N0 + N1 patients had a longer survival than N2 and N3 patients (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that mortality in T3 + T4 patients was 2.337 times that of Tis + T1 patients; mortality in N3 patients was 3.486 times that of N0 + N1 patients; and mortality in untreated patients was 2.772 times that of those treated with whole brain radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The number of BM-ESCC is correlated to T and N stages. The higher the N stage, the higher risk of brain metastases. The higher of T and N stages in ESCC, the worse in prognosis. Whole brain radiotherapy could offer greater survival benefits.

Cervical cancer treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy base on Sedlis criteria (NCCN VS RTOG).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of different target volumes in pelvic radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of cervical cancer based on the Sedlis criteria. METHODS: Patients who admitted to our department for post-operative radiotherapy of cervical cancer from December 2001 to December 2011 and met the Sedlis criteria were retrospectively analysed. The incidences of acute and late radiation injuries, and overall, disease-free and tumour-specific survival with reduced-volume pelvic and whole-pelvis radiotherapy were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were included in the study, including 239 receiving whole-pelvis radiotherapy and 132 receiving reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy. The volume of contours for mean PTV volumes, bilateral femoral heads and small intestine volumes in reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy were lower than whole-pelvis radiotherapy; the results were similar to the V10, V20, V30, V40 and V45 for pelvic bone marrow and small intestine dose volume (both p < 0.05). The acute radiation injury observed in the two groups was mainly haematologic toxicity and upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms. The incidences of acute radiation injury, and late radiation injury of gastrointestinal and urinary tracts were both significantly lower with reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy than with whole-pelvis radiotherapy (both p < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of lower extremity oedema, or 2-year or 5-year overall, disease-free or tumour-specific survival between groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy could relieve acute and late radiation injuries, especially myelosuppression, and did not affect long-term survival. Advanced in knowledge: Our study shows that reduced-volume base on National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2016 is more fit for cervical cancer than others.

Prostate cancer treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: Report on the 5-year outcome of a prospective series.

How to define a clinical target volume (CTV) as small as possible for prostate cancer to reduce the dose received by normal organs is an interesting study. We conduct a research to analyze the clinical efficacy of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using reduced CTV in the treatment of prostate cancer. From January 2006 to June 2010, 78 patients with prostate cancer were treated with IMRT according to this institutional protocol. Of them, 18 had stage II tumors, 39 had stage III tumors, and 21 had stage IVa tumors. Clinical outcomes included overall survival, biochemical recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and acute and chronic injuries caused by radiotherapy. Risk factors were evaluated using the Cox regression model. As of December 31, 2014, all patients completed radiotherapy as planned. Myelosuppression was mostly grade 1, acute urinary injury was mostly grades 1 and 2, and intestinal injury was mostly grade 1. The 5-year follow-up rate was 91.0%. The overall, progression-free, biochemical recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 82.1%, 79.4%, 84.6%, and 94.9%, respectively. Tumor volumes defined by small target volumes and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were 274.21 ±â€Š92.64 and 600.68 ±â€Š113.72, respectively, representing a significant difference (P < .05). Age, prostate-specific antigen level, eastern cooperative oncology Group score, Gleason score, and volume of CTV were independent risk factors for mortality and disease progression. Our findings indicated that IMRT with reduced CTV have less acute and chronic injuries caused by radiation, particularly grade 3 or higher urinary and intestinal injuries, while ensuring survival benefits and protecting the hematopoietic function.

Long-term cancer-related fatigue outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy.

The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between cancer-related fatigue and clinical parameters, and the effect factors of fatigue for the prostate cancer patients. Long-term follow-up is performed using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory before treatment (A), at the end of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (B), and 3 months (C), 12 months (D), 24 months (E), 36 months (F), and 48 months (G) after the end of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Three dimensions of fatigue are assessed during follow-up: severity, perceived interference with quality of life, and duration in the past week. In all, 97 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Median follow-up time was 43.9 months. The fatigue index was significantly higher in the prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, Gleason score >8, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, and the higher education. The most severe fatigue occurred at time points B and C. The score for duration of fatigue fluctuated across the time points, with significantly increased scores at time points D, E, and F.In conclusion, we show that cancer-related fatigue is the important symptom which affects the quality of life for the prostate cancer patients. For patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with a high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, a Gleason score of >8 points, prostate-specific antigen levels of >20 ng/mL, and high education, attention should be paid to the interference of fatigue with quality of life, especially general level of activity, ability to concentrate, and mood, after radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy.

Long-term quality of life outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation.

With great improvements in survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, quality of life (QOL) is becoming an important factor in the selection of treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in health-related QOL in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were treated with IMRT combined with androgen deprivation. Total dose to the prostate was 68.2 Gy (2.2 Gy per fraction), and patients received 50 mg of oral Casodex once daily and 3.6 mg of subcutaneous Zoladex once every 28 days for 2.5 years. QOL was measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. The time points were baseline, end of radiotherapy, and 3, 12, 36, 48, and 60 months after radiotherapy. From 2002 to 2007, a total of 87 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 76.8 months. Compared with baseline, all four domain summary scores were decreased to varying degrees. Statistically significant changes in the urinary, bowel, and hormonal domain scores were observed (P < 0.05). The changes in scores for urinary incontinence and dysuria were -13.0 ± 8.3 and -6.12 ± 3.9, respectively (P < 0.05). QOL was decreased in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after IMRT combined with androgen deprivation therapy in all four primary domains, especially in urinary, bowel, and hormonal domains. Nevertheless, the treatment was well tolerated in most patients during the 5 years of follow-up.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate acute adverse events and efficacy of three-dimensional intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were treated with three-dimensional IMRT combined with maximum androgen blockade. The correlation between radiation-induced rectal injury and clinical factors was further analyzed. RESULTS: After treatment, 21 patients had complete remission (CR), 37 had partial remission (PR), and nine had stable disease (SD), with an overall response rate of 86.5%. The follow-up period ranged from 12.5 to 99.6 months. Thirty-nine patients had a follow-up time of ≥ five years. In this group, three-year and five-year overall survival rates were 89% and 89.5%, respectively; three-year and five-year progression-free survival rates were 72% and 63%. In univariate analyses, gross tumor volume was found to be prognostic for survival (χ2 = 5.70, P = 0.037). Rates of leucopenia and anemia were 91.1% and 89.5%, respectively. Two patients developed acute liver injury, and a majority of patients developed acute radiation proctitis and cystitis, mainly grade 1/2. Tumor volume before treatment was the only prognostic factor influencing the severity of acute radiation proctitis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with intermediate and advanced prostate cancer.

A preliminary study on the consistency between the non-surgical staging and the surgical-pathological staging in oesophageal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the consistency between the clinical staging of non-surgically treated oesophageal carcinoma (preliminary draft) and the surgical-pathological staging of the oesophageal carcinoma. METHODS Comprehensive clinical data from 112 patients with oesophageal cancer were collected from January 2009 to June 2010. Based on the clinical staging standard for oesophageal carcinomas treated with non-surgical methods, the preoperative TNM staging was performed and the results were compared with pTNM. The Kappa statistic was used to analyse the degree of consistency. RESULTS The Kappa values from the T staging, N staging and TNM staging of surgical-pathological results were 0.545, 0.615 and -0.090, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Consistency was observed between the non-surgical T staging and N staging and the postoperative pathological T staging and N staging, but the degree of consistency was only moderate. Additionally, no consistency was observed between the TNM staging results from the two staging systems. Whether the non-surgical staging system can replace the pathological staging system and its significance in evaluating the prognosis remain to be determined.