Correlation between sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cN0 breast carcinoma: comparison of invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have suggested that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in women with cN0 breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes (SLNs). However, these studies included only a few patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), so the validity of omitting ALDN in these patients remains controversial. This study compared the frequency of non-sentinel lymph nodes (non-SLNs) metastases in ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). MATERIALS METHODS: Data relating to a total of 2583 patients with infiltrating breast carcinoma operated at our institution between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed: 2242 (86.8%) with IDC and 341 (13.2%) with ILC. We compared the incidence of metastasis to SLNs and non-SLNs between the ILC and IDC cohorts and examined factors that influenced non-SLNs metastasis. RESULTS: SLN biopsies were performed in 315 patients with ILC and 2018 patients with IDC. Metastases to the SLNs were found in 78/315 (24.8%) patients with ILC and in 460 (22.8%) patients with IDC (p = 0.31). The incidence of metastases to non-SLNs was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in ILC (52/78-66.7%) compared to IDC (207/460 - 45%). Multivariate analysis showed that ILC was the most influential predictive factor in predicting the presence of metastasis to non-SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: ILC cases have more non-SLNs metastases than IDC cases in SLN-positive patients. The ILC is essential for predicting non-SLN positivity in macro-metastases in the SLN. The option of omitting ALND in patients with ILC with 1-2 positive SLNs still requires further investigation.

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Axillary Surgical Management of Patients With Breast Cancer and Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is effective in patients with breast cancer (BC) and positive axillary lymph nodes undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, the frequency with which axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) can be avoided remains debated. This study aimed to identify patient populations that can benefit from this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 195 consecutive patients with BC and positive axillary lymph nodes at diagnosis who underwent NAC were retrospectively analyzed. In all cases, the positivity of the lymph nodes was confirmed by cytological examination. Patients converted to ycN0 after NAC were considered eligible for SLNB. Indications for ALND were failed mapping, fewer than three SLNs recovered, and positive SLNs. RESULTS: Of 195 cN1 patients potentially eligible for SLNB, 71 (36.4%) remained clinically ycN+ after NAC and underwent elective ALND, while 124 (83.7%) converted to ycN0 after NAC and SLNB. The lymph node identification rate was 95.9% (119/124 patients) with three or more SLNs recovered in 83 cases (89.8%). One or two lymph nodes were recovered in 36 cases (30.2%). Nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) was found in 34/83 (40.9%) patients with three or more SLNs recovered. Considering all 195 patients initially included in the study, 55 patients (28.2%) achieved lymph node pCR after NAC. Nodal pCR varied based on hormone receptor and HER2 status, with rates ranging from 20.7% for ER+/HER2- patients to 95.3% for ER-/HER2+ patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: More than 80% of cN1 patients in our study were eligible for SLNB after NAC. ALND could be avoided in approximately 30% of cases, supporting the role of NAC in reducing the need for ALND among patients with lymph node metastases.

Effects of the number of removed lymph nodes on survival outcome in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the gold standard surgical technique for axillary staging in patients with clinically node-negative. However, it is still uncertain what is the optimal number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to be removed to reduce the false-negative rate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with a single negative SLN have a worse prognosis than those with two or more negative SLNs. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a large series of SLN-negative breast cancer patients. Survival outcomes and regional recurrence rate were evaluated according to the number of removed SLNs. Secondly, the contribution of different adjuvant therapies on disease-free survival was explored. Statistical analysis included the chi-square, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1080 patients were included in the study. A first group consisted of 328 patients in whom a single SLN was retrieved, and a second group consisted of 752 patients in whom two or more SLNs were retrieved. There was no relevant difference in median DFS (64.9 vs 41.4) for SLN = 1 vs SLN > 1 groups (HR 0.76, CI 95% 0.39-1.46; p = 0.38). A statistically significant difference in mDFS was showed only for HT-treated patients who were SLN = 1 if compared to SLN > 1 (100.6 months versus 35.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: There is likely a relationship between the number of resected SNL and mDFS. Our results, however, showed no relevant difference in median DFS for SLN = 1 vs SLN > 1 group, except for a subset of the patients treated with hormone therapy.

Impact of BMI on Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound Assessment in Patients With Early Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of axillary ultrasound (AUS) with fine-needle aspiration with varying patient body mass index (BMI) is still unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the US features of axillary lymph nodes changes with BMI of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed involving 144 out of 270 patients with early breast cancer who underwent breast surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Diagnostic efficacy of AUS in preoperative axillary nodal staging was assessed in relation to BMI. RESULTS: Negative predictive values of AUS for the overweight and obese groups were statistically significantly lower compared to the normal/underweight group (p=0.02 and p=0.003, respectively). Additionally, Spearman's correlation coefficient R between BMI and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy was 0.257, suggesting a significantly positive linear relationship between the two variables in the cohort overall. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate how in our cohort the negative predictive value of AUS was significantly influenced by adipose tissue and that the selection of the most suitable instrumental diagnostic technique might contribute to improving heterogeneous results.