Individualized versus standard diet fortification for growth and development in preterm infants receiving human milk.

BACKGROUND: Human milk as compared to formula reduces morbidity in preterm infants but requires fortification to meet their nutritional needs and to reduce the risk of extrauterine growth failure. Standard fortification methods are not individualized to the infant and assume that breast milk is uniform in nutritional content. Strategies for individualizing fortification are available; however it is not known whether these are safe, or if they improve outcomes in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether individualizing fortification of breast milk feeds in response to infant blood urea nitrogen (adjustable fortification) or to breast milk macronutrient content as measured with a milk analyzer (targeted fortification) reduces mortality and morbidity and promotes growth and development compared to standard, non-individualized fortification for preterm infants receiving human milk at < 37 weeks' gestation or at birth weight < 2500 grams. SEARCH METHODS: We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 9), in the Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions(R); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), on September 20, 2019. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized, quasi-randomized, and cluster-randomized controlled trials of preterm infants fed exclusively breast milk that compared a standard non-individualized fortification strategy to individualized fortification using a targeted or adjustable strategy. We considered studies that examined any use of fortification in eligible infants for a minimum duration of two weeks, initiated at any time during enteral feeding, and providing any regimen of human milk feeding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected using the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal. Two review authors evaluated the quality of the studies and extracted data. We reported analyses of continuous data using mean differences (MDs), and dichotomous data using risk ratios (RRs). We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Data were extracted from seven RCTs, resulting in eight publications (521 total participants were enrolled among these studies), with duration of study interventions ranging from two to seven weeks. As compared to standard non-individualized fortification, individualized (targeted or adjustable) fortification of enteral feeds probably increased weight gain during the intervention (typical mean difference [MD] 1.88 g/kg/d, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26 to 2.50; 6 studies, 345 participants), may have increased length gain during the intervention (typical MD 0.43 mm/d, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.53; 5 studies, 242 participants), and may have increased head circumference gain during the intervention (typical MD 0.14 mm/d, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.23; 5 studies, 242 participants). Compared to standard non-individualized fortification, targeted fortification probably increased weight gain during the intervention (typical MD 1.87 g/kg/d, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.58; 4 studies, 269 participants) and may have increased length gain during the intervention (typical MD 0.45 mm/d, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57; 3 studies, 166 participants). Adjustable fortification probably increased weight gain during the intervention (typical MD 2.86 g/kg/d, 95% CI 1.69 to 4.03; 3 studies, 96 participants), probably increased gain in length during the intervention (typical MD 0.54 mm/d, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.7; 3 studies, 96 participants), and increased gain in head circumference during the intervention (typical MD 0.36 mm/d, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.5; 3 studies, 96 participants). We are uncertain whether there are differences between individualized versus standard fortification strategies in the incidence of in-hospital mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven late-onset bacterial sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, osteopenia, length of hospital stay, or post-hospital discharge growth. No study reported severe neurodevelopmental disability as an outcome. One study that was published after our literature search was completed is awaiting classification. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate- to low-certainty evidence suggesting that individualized (either targeted or adjustable) fortification of enteral feeds in very low birth weight infants increases growth velocity of weight, length, and head circumference during the intervention compared with standard non-individualized fortification. Evidence showing important in-hospital and post-discharge clinical outcomes was sparse and of very low certainty, precluding inferences regarding safety or clinical benefits beyond short-term growth.

Comparison of Types of Breast Milk Fortification at Discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Breast Milk Feeding Rates and Growth at 4 Months Corrected Age.

Background: Effects of breast milk (BM) enhancement on long-term BM feeding in preterm infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have not been examined previously. This study compares any BM feeding rates at 4 months corrected age (CA) in preterm infants discharged from the NICU on BM enhancement by fortification of expressed BM with infant formula additives (BM-F) versus BM supplemented with infant formula feeds (BM-S). Subjects and Methods: We compared infants born between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, with gestational age <32 weeks or birth weight <1500 g, discharged home on BM-F or BM-S from two NICUs and followed at 4 months CA. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity scoring estimated the adjusted associations between nutrition at discharge and any BM feeding at 4 months CA. Results: Two hundred eighty-five infants were followed at 4 months CA. Infants discharged on BM-F were more likely to have mothers with multiple gestation, private insurance and not Caucasian, initiate feeds of human milk, be discharged from NICU-1, and receive any BM at 4 months CA (p < 0.03). No significant difference in growth parameters <10th percentile at 4 months CA was observed between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, discharge from the NICU on BM-F was significantly associated with BM feeding at 4 months CA (odds ratio: 3.89, 95% confidence interval 1.66-9.14, p = 0.002). Conclusion: In this observational study, preterm infants receiving BM fortified with formula powder additives at discharge from the NICU had better BM feeding outcomes without poor growth at 4 months CA relative to those infants receiving BM supplemented with infant formula feeds.

Predictors of Mother's Own Milk Feeding at Discharge in Preterm Infants.

BACKGROUND: The dose-response benefits of human milk for preterm infants are well documented. Understanding factors that influence duration of mother's own milk (MOM) receipt may have important clinical implications. PURPOSE: To identify variables that significantly affect whether or not preterm infants receive their own mother's milk at discharge. METHODS: Maternal-infant dyads were eligible for inclusion if the infant was born between August 1, 2010, and July 31, 2015, was born at 32 weeks' gestation or less, or was 1800 g or less (institutional donor milk receipt criteria). Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 428 observations, 258 (60.3%) received MOM at discharge and 170 (39.7%) did not. Maternal characteristics that were protective for MOM receipt at discharge were non-Hispanic race, married, partner support, more educated, and private insurance. Protective infant characteristics were higher gestational age at birth, higher percentage of MOM feedings, fewer ventilator days, and more days of direct lactation. In multivariable logistic regression, the odds of receiving MOM at discharge significantly (odds ratio = 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-2.16; P < .001) increased with the increasing proportion of MOM. Regression analysis showed that gestational age and increased maternal age increased the likelihood of MOM receipt at discharge. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinicians will understand the significant effects even small increases in milk volume have on duration of MOM receipt at discharge, informing them of the importance of strategies to encourage and improve milk expression. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Future research studying critical time periods when mothers are most likely to reduce milk expression may have significant clinical importance.

Dose-response Relationship Between Donor Human Milk, Mother's Own Milk, Preterm Formula, and Neonatal Growth Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A dose-response relationship between proportions of donor human milk (DHM) intake and in-neonatal intensive care unit (in-NICU) growth rates, if any, remains poorly defined. Objective was to evaluate interrelationships between percentages of DHM, mother's own milk (MOM), and preterm formula (PF) intake and neonatal growth parameters at 36 weeks postmenstrual age or NICU discharge. METHODS: Infants eligible for this single-center retrospective study were inborn at ≤32 weeks gestation or ≤1800 g, stayed in the NICU for ≥7 days, and received enteral nutrition consisting of human milk fortified with Enfamil human milk fortifier acidified liquid. Study exposures were defined as 10% increments in the total volumetric proportions of infant diet provided as MOM, DHM, or PF. Outcomes were growth parameters at 36 weeks postmenstrual age or NICU discharge. Multivariable linear regression modeled the adjusted additive effect of infant diet on individual growth parameters. RESULTS: A total of 314 infants records were eligible for analysis. Using MOM as reference, the adjusted mean growth velocity for weight significantly decreased by 0.17 g ·â€Škg ·â€Šday for every 10% increase in DHM intake, but did not vary with PF intake. The adjusted mean change in weight z score significantly decreased with increasing proportion of DHM intake but significantly improved with increasing PF intake. The adjusted mean head circumference velocity was significantly decreased by 0.01 cm/wk for every 10% increase in DHM intake, in reference to MOM, but did not vary with PF intake. Neither proportion of DHM nor PF intake was associated with length velocity. CONCLUSIONS: When DHM and MOM are fortified interchangeably, preterm infants receiving incremental amounts of DHM are at increased risk of postnatal growth restriction. The dose-response relationship between DHM, MOM, and PF and long-term growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes warrants further research.

Five-Year Secular Trends and Predictors of Nonconsent to Receive Donor Milk in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To identify independent maternal and infant factors associated with donor milk nonconsent and to examine secular trends in nonconsent rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mothers of infants eligible to receive donor milk (≤32 weeks of gestation or ≤1,800 g) born between August 2010 and 2015 were included. Multivariable logistic regression modeled odds of nonconsent. RESULTS: Of the 486 mother/infant dyads from the first 5 years of the donor milk program, nonwhite race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.76) and increasing gestational age (aOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.21) independently predicted nonconsent. Each year the program existed, there was a 48% reduction in odds of nonconsent (aOR 0.52; 95% CI 0.43-0.62). The most common reason given for nonconsent was "it's someone else's milk." CONCLUSION: Program duration was associated with reduced nonconsent rates and may reflect increased exposure to information and acceptance of donor milk use among neonatal intensive care unit staff and parents. Despite overall improvements in consent rates, race-specific disparities in rates of nonconsent for donor milk persisted after 5 years of this donor milk program. Further research is warranted to clarify the basis for race-based disparities in donor milk nonconsent rates, with the goal of designing interventions to reduce donor milk refusal among minority mothers.

Variability of Criteria for Pasteurized Donor Human Milk Use: A Survey of U.S. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Medical Directors.

BACKGROUND: Use of donor human milk (DHM) is increasing, but criteria for its use are not well defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 34-question Internet-based survey of medical directors of U.S. level 3 and level 4 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), with the goal of describing specifics of policies developed to guide DHM use in U.S. NICUs. Respondents reported NICU characteristics and details of policies concerning DHM use. Policy-specified criteria for DHM use, if any, were described. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify NICU characteristics associated with DHM use. RESULTS: Respondents returned 153 (33%) surveys, with use of DHM reported by 91 (59%). Donor human milk use was more likely with more than 100 annual admissions <1500 g at birth (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.7) and with Vermont-Oxford Network participants (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.8-11.6). Among 72 NICUs reporting a written policy, criteria for providing DHM required birth weights varying from <1000 to <1800 g and/or gestational ages from <28 to <34 completed weeks, but criteria were reportedly waived in many circumstances. Policies regarding duration of DHM therapy were similarly varied. CONCLUSIONS: Criteria for initiating and continuing DHM vary widely among U.S. level 3 and level 4 NICUs. Donor human milk use is more frequent in NICUs with many very low-birth-weight admissions and among Vermont-Oxford Network participants. Further research is needed to define short- and long-term outcomes and cost benefits of DHM use in subgroups of NICU patients, particularly for uses other than necrotizing enterocolitis prevention.

Daily Breastmilk Volume in Mothers of Very Low Birth Weight Neonates: A Repeated-Measures Randomized Trial of Hand Expression Versus Electric Breast Pump Expression.

BACKGROUND: There are no randomized trials comparing early exclusive hand expression (HE) with early exclusive electric pump expression (electric expression [EE]) for milk removal in mothers of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Mothers of VLBW infants were randomized to exclusively HE or EE for the first 7 days postpartum. Daily volumes of milk were compared between groups for the first 28 days, adjusting for repeated measures. RESULTS: The HE (n=12) and the EE (n=14) groups did not differ with respect to age, parity, single versus multiple gestation, or number of expression sessions per day. There were 728 values for daily milk volumes in the first 28 days, including 105 HE and 623 EE. Mothers using exclusive HE had significantly (p<0.05) less cumulative daily milk production throughout the first 7 days postpartum compared with exclusive EE. Mean cumulative milk production among mothers using HE in the first postpartum week remained approximately half that of those using the electric pump throughout the first 28 days, without evident catch up. In multivariable analysis, each postpartum day was associated with an adjusted increase of 50 mL of human milk/day during the first 7 days postpartum and an increase of 13 mL/day between postpartum Days 8 and 28. After adjusting for repeated measures, number of expression sessions per day, and postpartum day, EE was associated with an advantage in milk production of 119 mL/day during the first 28 postpartum days compared with HE. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with mothers using EE, mothers using HE had significantly less cumulative daily milk production during the first 7 days postpartum. This trend continued after the intervention had been discontinued, and the great majority of expressions in both groups were with EE. Further research to confirm and expand these findings is warranted.

Establishing breastfeeding with the late preterm infant in the NICU.

OBJECTIVE: To describe challenges that late preterm infants (LPIs) face with breastfeeding and to provide an overview of current policy statements and practice guidelines that support breastfeeding for LPIs. In addition, we describe current breastfeeding research related to the LPI and combine this research with policies and practice guidelines to provide evidence-based recommendations to guide practice and future research in the NICU. DATA SOURCES: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PubMed databases. STUDY SELECTION: Policies, guidelines, and research relevant to breastfeeding the LPI were selected if they were published between January 1, 2009 and March 1, 2014. All documents were published in English and related to breastfeeding management or breastfeeding outcomes for the LPI. DATA EXTRACTION: Information from articles, policies, and guidelines were chosen for their relevance to breastfeeding the LPI. DATA SYNTHESIS: Policy statements and practice guidelines were reviewed to provide an understanding of breastfeeding recommendations for the LPI. Additionally, recent research studies were reviewed and combined with the policy statements and practice guidelines to provide practice recommendations for NICU providers. CONCLUSIONS: LPIs require a unique set of interventions for breastfeeding success; though they might be perceived as small, full-term infants, these infants often have greater challenges with breastfeeding than their term counterparts. Future research should be directed at identifying and testing specific strategies that will best support this at-risk population. Findings from this article are applicable for the LPI in the NICU as well as other care areas such as special care and transitional nurseries.

Optimal periods of exclusive breastfeeding associated with any breastfeeding duration through one year.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify optimal minimum durations of exclusive breastfeeding associated with maintenance of any breastfeeding at 15 time points during the first year of life. STUDY DESIGN: Mothers (n = 1189) from the prospective Infant Feeding Practices Study II cohort who initiated exclusive breastfeeding with healthy term infants were included. In a 80:20 split-sample validation study, receiver operating characteristic curves estimated optimal minimum durations of exclusive breastfeeding needed to predict maintenance of any breastfeeding at 15 time points during the first year (n = 951). Logistic regression estimated the predictive performance of the identified thresholds adjusted for maternal age, race, education, parity, support system, and return-to-work status. Results were validated in the remaining 20% (n = 238). RESULTS: Optimal minimum durations ranged from 4.0-17.1 weeks of exclusive breastfeeding associated with maintenance of any breastfeeding at 15 time points. All estimated threshold durations were statistically significant after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Using a methodological approach unique to breastfeeding duration research, the authors report optimal durations of exclusive breastfeeding associated with duration of any breastfeeding at time points throughout the first year. Perinatal clinicians, pediatricians, lactation professionals, policymakers, researchers, and families might apply these findings to achieve desirable collective breastfeeding duration outcomes.

Patterns and predictors of donor human milk non-consent in the neonatal ICU.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has not evaluated predictors of donor human milk (DHM) non-consent status in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) setting within the United States. The purpose of this study is to identify and describe maternal and infant factors associated with DHM consent status in a Level IV inner-city neonatal ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographics and additional maternal/infant data were stratified by DHM consent and compared with the appropriate parametric/nonparametric hypothesis testing statistic. A predictive multivariable logistic regression model was constructed, adjusted for independent predictors identified in the bivariate analysis (p≤0.2) using a backwards selection process (retention threshold p≤0.1). The adjusted odds ratios generated from the multivariable model identified predictors independently associated with DHM non-consent. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 113 mother-infant dyads from the first 18 months of a DHM program, with 65 mothers consenting to DHM and 48 not consenting. Race, ethnicity, marital status, education, delivery mode, and presence of a breastfeeding duration goal qualified for inclusion into the multivariable model. Only race and marital status were retained in the final model. In this sample, black race, other race, and being married are all independent predictors for DHM non-consent. CONCLUSIONS: Black race, other race, and marital status statistically predicted DHM non-consent in a Level IV inner-city neonatal ICU. These results are relevant to all neonatal ICUs who use DHM and to those who are developing DHM programs.

The discordance between planned use and actual receipt of immediate postpartum depot medroxyprogesterone among low-income women.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the patterns of planned use and actual receipt of immediate postpartum depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA) prior to hospital discharge among low-income breastfeeding initiators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bivariate analyses among DMPA recipients by prenatal planned/unplanned use and the sensitivity of DMPA self-report relative to pharmacologic record were calculated. RESULTS: Among immediate postpartum DMPA recipients (n=58), 72.4% (n=42) did not plan to use DMPA. The sensitivity of self-reported DMPA use was 89.7% (95% confidence interval, 85.2, 94.2). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, it is unclear if the immediate postpartum period is the appropriate time to obtain consent and administer a long-acting contraceptive method. In our sample, women accurately recalled receiving DMPA in the immediate postpartum period. However, the majority did not plan to use this contraceptive method. Further high-quality qualitative and quantitative research regarding women's contraceptive plans and perception of the postpartum DMPA consent process and the healthcare provider's attitudes regarding consent and prescription of immediate postpartum DMPA are warranted.

The Effect of a Donor Milk Policy on the Diet of Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

BACKGROUND: Use of donor milk (DM) to supplement mother's own milk (MOM) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is steadily increasing based on health and developmental benefits to premature infants. A paucity of data exists documenting the effect of DM use on the diet of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants related to the implementation of a DM policy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare VLBW enteral intake type in the first 28 days of life before versus after establishing a DM policy. METHODS: This single-center pre-post prospective cohort study included all inborn infants ≤ 1500 grams in a level 4 NICU remaining hospitalized at 28 days and admitted either before (pre-DM period, October 2009-March 2010) or after (DM period, October 2010-September 2012) implementing a DM policy. The feeding protocol was unchanged in both periods. Collected data included maternal/infant demographics, infant clinical data, and daily volume of enteral intake as MOM, DM, and formula. The proportion of enteral feeds from these sources during the first 28 days of life was compared pre-DM versus DM. RESULTS: Compared to pre-DM baseline, formula exposure was significantly decreased, and human milk exposure and proportion of diet as human milk increased. The proportion of infants fed exclusively human milk increased. Exposure to and proportion of diet as MOM was unchanged. Infants were fed earlier in the DM period. CONCLUSION: Establishment of a DM policy was associated with reduced exposure to formula, promoting an exclusively human milk diet, with earlier initiation of feeds and no decrease in use of MOM.

Donor human milk bank data collection in north america: an assessment of current status and future needs.

BACKGROUND: The Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA) is a nonprofit association that standardizes and facilitates the establishment and operation of donor human milk (DHM) banks in North America. Each HMBANA milk bank in the network collects data on the DHM it receives and distributes, but a centralized data repository does not yet exist. In 2010, the Food and Drug Administration recognized the need to collect and disseminate systematic, standardized DHM bank data and suggested that HMBANA develop a DHM data repository. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe data currently collected by HMBANA DHM banks and evaluate feasibility and interest in participating in a centralized data repository. METHODS: We conducted phone interviews with individuals in different HMBANA milk banks and summarized descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eight of 13 (61.5%) sites consented to participate. All respondents collected donor demographics, and half (50%; n = 4) rescreened donors after 6 months of continued donation. The definition of preterm milk varied between DHM banks (≤ 32 to ≤ 40 weeks). The specific computer program used to house the data also differed. Half (50%; n = 4) indicated that they would consider participation in a centralized repository. CONCLUSIONS: Without standardized data across all HMBANA sites, the creation of a centralized data repository is not yet feasible. Lack of standardization and transparency may deter implementation of donor milk programs in the neonatal intensive care unit setting and hinder benchmarking, research, and quality improvement initiatives.

Independent predictors of human milk receipt at neonatal intensive care unit discharge.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to construct a predictive model for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants' receipt of mother's own milk within 24 hours before neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge. STUDY DESIGN: Vermont Oxford Network (VON) clinical data were analyzed retrospectively for VLBW infants admitted between 2002 and 2012 at an inner city, level IV NICU with a well-established lactation program. Bivariate analyses compared infant characteristics between recipients and nonrecipients of human milk before 24 hours of NICU discharge. Independent predictors identified in the bivariate analyses (p ≤ 0.05), were eligible for inclusion into a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: We observed a 60.4% human milk feeding rate at NICU discharge. Multiple independent maternal (black race and Hispanic ethnicity) and clinical factors (need for mechanical ventilation, patent ductus arteriosus, late-onset sepsis, or discharge to home on a cardiorespiratory monitor) positively predicted the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our results were inconsistent with previous studies and suggest that a strong NICU lactation program in combination with a community-based peer counselor program may increase rates of human milk receipt among VLBW infants born to black/Hispanic mothers and those with more complicated neonatal courses.

Use of school gardens in academic instruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the status of gardens in California schools. DESIGN: A self-administered Internet and mailed survey was sent to all California principals (N = 9805). PARTICIPANTS: 4194 California school principals. VARIABLES MEASURED: School garden practices, attitudes associated with the use of gardens in schools, and perceptions of barriers to having and using school gardens in academic instruction. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and chi-square; P < .05. RESULTS: A 43% response rate was achieved. The most frequent reason for having a garden was for enhancement of academic instruction. Gardens were most commonly used for teaching science, environmental studies, and nutrition. Principals strongly agreed that resources such as curriculum materials linked to academic instruction and lessons on teaching nutrition in the garden would assist in the school garden being used for academic instruction. Principals deemed the garden as being not to slightly effective at enhancing the school meal program. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: School gardens appear to be predominantly used by most schools to enhance academic instruction. There is a need for curriculum materials and teacher training for gardening and nutrition. The link between the garden and the school meal program is an area that clearly requires attention. School lunch would be a logical setting for provision of edible produce, in addition to taste-testing of fresh produce in the garden or classroom setting.