Selection of baseline blood pressure to guide management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

INTRODUCTION: Recommendations on vasopressor management during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia suggest maintaining systolic arterial pressure ≥90% of an accurately measured baseline value. The baseline is often taken as the first reading in the operating room. We hypothesise that this reading may not reflect an accurate baseline value. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of 300 non-hypertensive women undergoing caesarean section with neuraxial anaesthesia, including spinal anaesthesia for elective delivery (n=100), and spinal (n=100) and epidural top-up anaesthesia (n=100) for emergency delivery. Systolic arterial pressure values recorded at various time points between the last antenatal visit and the first blood pressure value recorded in the operating room were compared. RESULTS: There was a stepwise and significant increase in systolic arterial pressure over three time points (last antenatal clinic, morning of surgery, operating room) before elective caesarean section (all P <0.001). In women having emergency caesarean under spinal anaesthesia, a stepwise increase over four time points (last antenatal clinic, first reading in labour, final reading in labour, operating room) was observed. A similar trend was seen over these time points for women having emergency caesarean under epidural top-up, although the systolic blood pressure did not rise during labour. CONCLUSIONS: Using the initial blood pressure reading in the operating room as the baseline value may lead to unnecessary vasopressor use and hypertension. Prospective research is required to clarify which reading represents the most accurate baseline to maintain homeostasis and reduce the hypotensive sequelae of neuraxial anaesthesia for both the mother and fetus.

Double-lumen tracheal tubes and bougies: a bench study to investigate factors that influence the risk of shearing.

Tracheal intubation with a double-lumen tube can be more challenging than with a single-lumen tube. A bougie can be used to facilitate intubation. Case reports have described fragment shearing from bougies when they are removed from the tube after intubation. These fragments have the potential to cause harm. It has even been suggested that bougies and double-lumen tubes should not be used together. We conducted a benchtop trial to investigate factors that influence the risk of shearing. We investigated three brands of double-lumen tube (each in three sizes and both lateralities) and four brands of bougie. We simulated one intubation and 29 further insertions/removals of bougie with every bougie-double-lumen tube combination. We inspected the inside of the tube for evidence of shearing after first, tenth and thirtieth removals. We found that brand of bougie, brand of double-lumen tube and size of double-lumen tube (but not its laterality) all influenced the degree of shearing. Certain bougie-double-lumen tube combinations produced a particularly high degree of shearing, so these should be avoided.