Effect of a dalteparin prophylaxis protocol using anti-factor Xa concentrations on venous thromboembolism in high-risk trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Low anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) concentrations with twice-daily enoxaparin are associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in high-risk trauma patients. Concerns have been raised with once-daily dalteparin regarding effectiveness and achievable anti-Xa concentrations. The purpose of this before-and-after study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a VTE prophylaxis protocol using anti-Xa concentrations and associated dalteparin dose adjustment in high-risk trauma patients. METHODS: Adult trauma patients receiving VTE chemoprophylaxis and hospitalized for at least 3 days were prospectively followed during two 6-month epochs before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of anti-Xa monitoring. In both groups, high-risk patients received dalteparin 5,000 U subcutaneously once daily; low-risk patients received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin. High-risk POST patients with anti-Xa less than 0.1 IU/mL 12 hours after initial dalteparin dose received dalteparin every 12 hours. All patients underwent routine VTE ultrasound surveillance of the lower extremities. The primary outcome was incidence of VTE. RESULTS: A total of 785 patients (PRE, n = 428; POST, n = 357) were included. Demographics, injury patterns, Injury Severity Score (ISS), red blood cell transfusions, intensive care unit and hospital stays, and mortality did not differ between groups. Overall, POST patients had lower VTE (7.0% vs. 13%, p = 0.009) including acute VTE (6.4% vs. 12%, p = 0.01) and proximal deep vein thromboembolism (2.2% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.019). Between high-risk patients, VTE occurred in 53 (16.3%) PRE compared with 24 (9.0%) POST patients (p = 0.01); there was no difference in VTE between low-risk patients (PRE, 2.0% vs. POST, 1.1%; p = 0.86). Among 190 high-risk POST patients with anti-Xa, 97 (51%) were less than 0.1 IU/mL. Patients with low anti-Xa had higher rates of VTE (14.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.05) and deep vein thromboembolism (14.4% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.01). Younger age (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.99) and greater weight (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.03) predicted low anti-Xa on multivariate regression. CONCLUSION: A VTE prophylaxis protocol using anti-Xa-based dalteparin dosage adjustment in high-risk trauma patients was associated with decreased VTE. Once-daily dalteparin 12-hour anti-Xa concentrations are suboptimal in a majority of patients and associated with VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Antibiotic allergies in the medical record: effect on drug selection and assessment of validity.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency with which reported antibiotic allergies alter drug selection and to assess the validity of these allergies. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review, with concurrent interviews conducted in a selected subgroup of patients. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Three hundred patients with at least one documented antibiotic allergy and who received an antibiotic while hospitalized. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected to determine the patients' allergies documented in the medical record. The first antibiotic regimen that each patient received while hospitalized was evaluated for deviation from the standard of care as determined from institutional protocols, recommendations in the literature, and expert opinion. A total of 416 allergies to antibiotics were reported. Penicillins were the agents most commonly reported (198 reports), followed by sulfonamides, cephalosporins, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. The reported allergies altered antibiotic therapy in 91 (30.3%) patients. Report of a penicillin or cephalosporin allergy and use of antibiotics for prophylaxis were strong predictors of altered therapy. The subgroup consisted of 100 patients who were interviewed to determine the specific details of their reported allergic reactions. For 22 of the 100 patients, major discrepancies were found between their verbal reports and medical record documentation. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale was used to determine the validity of their reactions. Among these 100 patients, 109 (78.4%) of 139 reported reactions to antibiotics were deemed to be allergic in nature. For 55 (50.5%) of the 109 allergic reactions, the Naranjo score was 5 or greater, which correlates with probable to definite validity. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies between the medical record and in-depth allergy histories are common, and the validity of reported allergic reactions is frequently questionable. Because documentation of an antibiotic allergy frequently alters therapy, increased effort to verify these reactions may be beneficial.