RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Utility, a major principle for allocation in the context of transplantation, is questioned in patients with acute-on chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF-3) who undergo liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to explore long-term outcomes of patients included the three-center retrospective French experience published in 2017. METHOD: All patients with ACLF-3 (n=73) as well as their transplanted matched controlled with ACLF-2 (n=145), 1 (n=119) and no ACLF (n=292) that have participated in the princeps study published in 2017 were included. We explored 5- and 10-year patient and graft survivals, causes of death and their predictive factors. RESULTS: Median follow-up of patients ACLF-3 patients was 7.5 years. At LT, median MELD was 40. In patients with ACLF-3, 2, 1 and no ACLF, 5-year patients' survivals were respectively 72.6% vs. 69.7% vs. 76.4% vs. 77.0% (p=0.31). Ten-year patients' survival ACLF-3 was 56.8% and was not different other groups (p=0.37) Leading causes of death in ACLF-3 patients were infections (33.3%), and cardiovascular events (23.3%). After exclusion of early death, UCLA futility risk score, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index and Chronic Liver Failure Consortium ACLF score were independently associated with 10-year patients' survival. Long-term grafts' survivals were not different across the groups. Clinical frailty scale and WHO performance status improved over time in patients alive after 5 years. CONCLUSION: 5- and 10-year patients' and grafts' survivals in ACLF-3 patients were not different from their controls. 5-year patients' survival is higher than that of the 50%-70% threshold defining the utility of liver graft. Efforts should focus on candidates' selection based on comorbidities as well as the prevention of infection and cardiovascular events standing as the main cause of death. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: While short-term outcomes following liver transplantation in the most severely ill cirrhotic patients (ACLF-3) are known, long-term data are limited, raising questions about the utility of graft allocation in the context of scarce medical resources. This study provides a favorable long-term update, confirming no differences in 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival following liver transplantation in ACLF-3 patients compared to matched ACLF-2, ACLF-1, and no-ACLF patients. The study highlights the risk of dying from infection and cardiovascular causes in the long-term and identifies scores including comorbidities evaluation, such as the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, as independently associated with long-term survival. Therefore, physicians should consider the cumulative burden of comorbidities when deciding to transplant these patients. Additionally, after transplantation, the study encourages mitigating infectious risk with tailored immunosuppressive regimens and managing tightly cardiovascular risk over time.
RESUMO
Currently, one-year survival following liver transplantation (LT) exceeds 90% in large international registries, and LT is considered definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and liver cancer. Recurrence of disease, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), significantly hampers post-LT outcomes. An optimal approach to immunosuppression (IS), including safe weaning, may benefit patients by mitigating the effect on recurrent diseases, as well as reducing adverse events associated with over-/under-IS, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prediction of these outcome measures-disease recurrence, CKD, and immune status-has long been based on relatively inaccurate clinical models. To address the utility of new biomarkers in predicting these outcomes in the post-LT setting, the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) and International Liver Transplant Society (ILTS) convened a working group of experts to review literature pertaining to primary disease recurrence, development of CKD, and safe weaning of IS. Summaries of evidence were presented to the group of panelists and juries to develop guidelines, which were discussed and voted in-person at the Consensus Conference in Prague November 2022. The consensus findings and recommendations of the Liver Working Group on new biomarkers in LT, clinical applicability, and future needs are presented in this article.
