Primum non Nocere: How to ensure continuity of care and prevent cancer patients from being overlooked during the COVID- 19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread to all countries since December 2019, triggering a pandemic within weeks of the initial outbreak. Doctors were presented with the challenge of having to reimagine the traditional hospital organisation in order to effectively manage patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the months of the COVID-19 pandemic our Institution was assisted by a call-center (CC) that triaged cancer patients planned for follow-up in our outpatient clinics: C1 (for female cancers), C2 (for gastrointestinal, urogenital, and thoracic tumours), and D1 (for melanoma and for patients with tumours in over 5 years follow up). Data refers to the period between 15 April and 3 July 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1054 patients have been included in our study and 1005 (95%) of the contacts were successful. The analysis showed a majority of female patients (74%) and patients affected by breast cancer (56%). Among the options provided 646 patients (92.4%) opted for online consultancy. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that cancer patients valued technology-mediated follow-up visits mainly during the beginning of the pandemic because patients themselves were afraid to come to the hospital. Although telemedicine has intrinsic limitations, it is important for providing assistance and preventing cancer patients from feeling isolated during an emergency.

Use of a contact center telephone helpline in rheumatology outpatient management: a five-year experience analysis and patients' perception.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze our five-year experience with a telephone helpline service for patients suffering from chronic rheumatic diseases and provide the patients' perspective derived from a dedicated survey. METHODS: A telephone service (contact center) was set up in the rheumatology unit at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, in September 2007. It is managed by operators from a medical service society who collect the patients'calls. Daily reports with medical issues are transmitted to the physicians who are supposed to call back shortly. A year after the institution of the contact center, a questionnaire was administered to a group of patients to address the level of satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 39,076 calls were registered between September 2007 and August 2012. Each month, an average of 20% of the calls were made by patients referring to our rheumatology unit for the first time and an average of 68.5% patients phoned to request medical consultation. Demographic analysis demonstrated a prevalence of middle-aged female patients. The majority of patients filling in the questionnaire declared an intention to use it again in the future. Furthermore, 85.7% of callers reported full satisfaction with respect to the responses received to their requests. CONCLUSIONS: A telephone helpline may provide extra-clinical advice and support for patients with rheumatic diseases. Although these services cannot replace clinical appointments, they should be encouraged both to assure patients easy access to medical counseling and to optimize the daily clinical workload of physicians.