Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma for acute nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a prospective cohort study.

Background: As the most common acute optic neuropathy in older patients, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) presents with varying degrees of visual acuity loss and visual field defect. However, there is no generally accepted treatment for NAION. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for patients with acute NAION within 2 months. Design: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial. Methods: Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients were enrolled. Of them, 13 received anisodine hydrobromide and butylphthalide-sodium chloride injection continuously for 10 days as basic treatment in the control group, and 12 received two tenon capsule injections of PRP on a 10 days interval as an additional treatment in the PRP group. We compared the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and capillary perfusion density (CPD) of radial peripapillary capillaries and the moth-eaten eara of the peripapillary superficial capillary plexus and deep capillary plexus at 1 day (D1) before the first PRP treatment and 7 days (D7), 14 days (D14), and 30 days (D30) after the first PRP injection. Ocular and systemic adverse effects were assessed. Results: In the PRP group, a better BCVA occurred at D30 (adjusted p = 0.005, compared with D1, recovered from 0.67 ± 0.59 to 0.43 ± 0.59), and a significant improvement in CPD was observed at D30 (adjusted p < 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.027, compared with D1, D7, D14, in sequence, the value was 35.97 ± 4.65, 38.73 ± 4.61, 39.05 ± 5.26, 42.71 ± 4.72, respectively). CPD at D7 in the PRP group was better than that in the control group (p = 0.043). However, neither BCVA nor the moth-eaten area index were significantly different (all p > 0.5) between the two groups. The main adverse effect was local discomfort resolved within 1 week, and no other systemic adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Tenon capsule injection of PRP was a safe treatment for AION and could improve capillary perfusion of the optic nerve head and might be helpful in increasing short-term vision in patients with acute NAION.

Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma in preventing adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in reducing adhesion reformation in women with moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA)? DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, women with moderate-to-severe IUA were recruited between November 2019 and June 2021 from a university hospital and randomized into the PRP or control group. The PRP group was treated using an intrauterine-suitable balloon combined with PRP infusion following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, whereas the control group received only the former intervention. The reductions in adhesion scores from before to after surgery and the adhesion reformation rate were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 123 participants successfully completed the study (PRP group, 63; control group, 60). Age, pregnancy history, menstrual score and American Fertility Society score before surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. At the second-look hysteroscopy, the PRP group had a significantly greater reduction in adhesion score than the control group (7 versus 6, respectively; P = 0.027). The postoperative adhesion reformation rates in the PRP group and the control group were 20.6% and 30.0%, respectively (risk ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.27-1.38, P = 0.232; number needed to treat 10.6). CONCLUSIONS: Intrauterine PRP infusion seems to be beneficial in reducing postoperative adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.

[Preparation of Platelet-Rich Plasma from the White Slurry and Its Effect on MSC Proliferation].

OBJECTIVE: To isolate platelet-rich plasma(PRP) from the white slurry(WS), a depleted fraction of the clinical blood supply, so as to provide an easier method to harvest PRP for related studies and clinical use. METHODS: The protocols preparing PRP from whole blood and WS were compared. The morphological characteristics of the different PRPs were observed under transmission electron microscope; the expression of the platelet markers CD41a and CD42b were detected by the flow cytometry. Moreover, the ingredients of the PRPs were measured by using cytoanalyzer. for detecting the physiological function of the PRP, the harvested PRP were added to MSC culture and the cell proliferation was detected by using CCK-8 method. RESULTS: a large amount of PRP from WS was easier harvested. the WS-derived PRP shared similar morphological characteristics and ingredients as compared with whole blood-derived PRP. Importantly, the WS-derived PRP exhibited a higher expression of CD41a and CD42b than that of traditional PRP, which indicate that the WS is a promising reservoir for PRP. CONCLUSION: The WS can be used to prepare PRP, and the novel PRP share similar biological characteristics as traditional PRP prepared from whole blood. The present study provides an easier and economical method to harvest PRP and this findings may be helpful for PRP related studies.