Barriers to the effective treatment of sepsis: antimicrobial agents, sepsis definitions, and host-directed therapies.

Sepsis is a complex clinical syndrome involving both infection and a deleterious host immune response. Antimicrobial agents are key elements of sepsis treatment, yet despite great strides in antimicrobial development in the last decades, sepsis continues to be associated with unacceptably high mortality (~30%). This is the result, on one hand, of the rise of antimicrobial resistant organisms and, on the other hand, of the dearth of effective host-directed immune therapies. A major obstacle to the development of good host-directed therapies is the lack of understanding of the host immune response. The problem is exacerbated by poor nonspecific clinical definitions of disease. Poor definitions have had a profound impact on sepsis research, from epidemiologic studies to the failed clinical trials of host-directed therapies. Therefore, better definitions must be developed to enable advancement in the field.

An Endotoxin Tolerance Signature Predicts Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction at Initial Clinical Presentation.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis involves aberrant immune responses to infection, but the exact nature of this immune dysfunction remains poorly defined. Bacterial endotoxins like lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are potent inducers of inflammation, which has been associated with the pathophysiology of sepsis, but repeated exposure can also induce a suppressive effect known as endotoxin tolerance or cellular reprogramming. It has been proposed that endotoxin tolerance might be associated with the immunosuppressive state that was primarily observed during late-stage sepsis. However, this relationship remains poorly characterised. Here we clarify the underlying mechanisms and timing of immune dysfunction in sepsis. METHODS: We defined a gene expression signature characteristic of endotoxin tolerance. Gene-set test approaches were used to correlate this signature with early sepsis, both newly and retrospectively analysing microarrays from 593 patients in 11 cohorts. Then we recruited a unique cohort of possible sepsis patients at first clinical presentation in an independent blinded controlled observational study to determine whether this signature was associated with the development of confirmed sepsis and organ dysfunction. FINDINGS: All sepsis patients presented an expression profile strongly associated with the endotoxin tolerance signature (p < 0.01; AUC 96.1%). Importantly, this signature further differentiated between suspected sepsis patients who did, or did not, go on to develop confirmed sepsis, and predicted the development of organ dysfunction. INTERPRETATION: Our data support an updated model of sepsis pathogenesis in which endotoxin tolerance-mediated immune dysfunction (cellular reprogramming) is present throughout the clinical course of disease and related to disease severity. Thus endotoxin tolerance might offer new insights guiding the development of new therapies and diagnostics for early sepsis.

CCR5 expression is reduced in lymph nodes of HIV type 1-infected women, compared with men, but does not mediate sex-based differences in viral loads.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected women have lower viral loads than men but similar rates of disease progression. We hypothesized that sex-based differences in CCR5 expression mediate viral load differences. METHODS: CCR5 was analyzed by flow cytometry in disaggregated lymph node cells from untreated HIV-1-infected women (n = 28) and men (n = 27). The frequencies of HIV-1 RNA-producing cells in the lymph node were determined by in situ hybridization. Linear and generalized linear regression models were used. RESULTS: The percentage of CCR5(+)CD3(+)CD4(+) cells was lower in women (mean, 12%) than men (mean, 16%; P = .034). Neither the percentage of CCR5(+)CD3(+)CD4(+) cells nor the CCR5 density predicted viral load or HIV-1 RNA-producing lymph node cells (P ≥ .24), after adjusting for CD4(+) T-cell count, race, and age. Women had marginally fewer HIV-1 RNA-producing cells (mean, 0.21 cells/mm(2)) than men (mean, 0.44 cells/mm(2); P = .046). After adjusting for the frequency of HIV-1 RNA-producing cells and potential confounders, the viral load in women were 0.46 log10 copies/mL lower than that in men (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced lymph node CCR5 expression in women did not account for the viral load difference between sexes. CCR5 expression did not predict viral load or frequencies of HIV-1 RNA-producing cells, indicating that physiologic levels of CCR5 do not limit HIV-1 replication in lymph node. Less plasma virus was associated with each HIV-1 RNA-producing cell in women as compared to men, suggesting that women may either produce fewer virions per productively infected cell or more effectively clear extracellular virus.

INVEX--a web-based tool for integrative visualization of expression data.

SUMMARY: Gene expression or metabolomics data generated from clinical settings are often associated with multiple metadata (i.e. diagnosis, genotype, gender, etc.). It is of great interest to analyze and to visualize the data in these contexts. Here, we introduce INVEX-a novel web-based tool that integrates the server-side capabilities for data analysis with the browse-based technology for data visualization. INVEX has two key features: (i) flexible differential expression analysis for a wide variety of experimental designs; and (ii) interactive visualization within the context of metadata and biological annotations. INVEX has built-in support for gene/metabolite annotation and a fully functional heatmap builder. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available at http://www.invex.ca.