Change in Neuropsychological Test Performance Seen in a Longitudinal Study of Patients With Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19: A 6-Month Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 may include physical, psychiatric, and neurocognitive symptoms. Few studies of cognitive symptoms have been longitudinal, with many following participants briefly after infection and relying on subjective complaints, screening instruments, or computerized testing. This group previously reported diminished neuropsychological (NP) test performance in over half of 60 individuals tested in-person 7 months post-COVID-19, particularly those seeking care for cognitive complaints. The current study describes the initial and 6-month follow-up results of an expanded cohort of 75 participants. OBJECTIVE: To measure longitudinal changes in neuropsychological test performance, as well as medical and psychiatric changes, post-COVID-19. METHODS: Participants underwent NP, psychiatric, and medical assessments approximately 7 months after acute COVID-19 infection. Sixty-three (84%) returned approximately 6 months later for repeat evaluation. RESULTS: At the initial visit, 29 (38.7%) met criteria for low NP performance, and 16 (21.3%) met criteria for extremely low NP performance. At 6-month follow-up, several NP domains that were significantly below normative values at the initial visit were no longer abnormal, with the exception of language. Only measures of delayed memory and fatigue showed significant improvements between the 2 time points. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of individuals recovered from acute COVID-19 infection have persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms over 1 year after infection. While the overall sample in this study showed some improvement in NP test performance relative to norms, only fatigue and delayed memory improved significantly between times 1 and 2. No individual declined in NP test performance, though relatively few individuals made significant clinical improvement, indicating the need for serial neuropsychiatric assessment and treatment supports. Longitudinal follow-up of this cohort is in progress.

Frequency, Characteristics, and Correlates of Cognitive Complaints in a Cohort of Individuals with Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive complaints are among the most frequent symptoms of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). This study aimed to investigate the frequency, characteristics, and clinical correlates of cognitive complaints (CC) in PASC, particularly in relation to objective neuropsychological (NP) performance. METHODS: Seventy-four participants underwent psychiatric, medical, and NP testing approximately 7 months after acute COVID-19. The Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) was used to characterize the frequency and severity of CC in domains of memory, language, and cognitive/executive function. The associations of CC with sociodemographic, medical, psychiatric, and NP variables were assessed utilizing correlational analysis, logistic regression, and pairwise comparisons of those categorized as having CC vs. not having CC. RESULTS: Taken together, approximately one-third of the study participants had clinically significant CC. Memory difficulty was the most frequent CC, although all categories were frequently endorsed. Memory and cognitive/executive complaints correlated with NP tests in these and multiple other NP domains. CC were more likely to be under-reported in those with diminished NP performance than over-reported in those without diminished performance. Acute COVID-19 symptom severity, elevated depressive symptoms, and NP tests of diminished attention and psychomotor processing speed were independent predictors of CC in logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive complaints after acute COVID-19 should be taken seriously, as they are likely to reflect diminished NP performance, as well as medical, psychiatric, and functional burdens. However, patients with PASC may not accurately identify or characterize objective cognitive difficulties, so programs offering comprehensive care for patients with PASC should offer formal neuropsychological testing.

A meta-analysis of the potential antidepressant effects of buprenorphine versus placebo as an adjunctive pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Numerous reports have suggested that buprenorphine may have antidepressant effects. Many individuals with depressive disorders don't respond to first-line treatment and are classified with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Novel therapies for depression are required to better treat this population. This meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials sought to evaluate the potential antidepressant effects of buprenorphine as an adjunctive pharmacological treatment for individuals with TRD. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until June 2019 for original peer-reviewed reports of buprenorphine used for the treatment of depression. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were generated from random effects models. Risk of publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored in subgroup analyses. RESULTS: In six studies that met inclusion criteria, depression symptom severity in individuals with TRD was not significantly decreased after an adjunctive intervention with buprenorphine when compared to placebo (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.21-0.06, p = 0.30). Five of the six studies utilized a combination of buprenorphine/samidorphan. In these studies, depression symptom severity was also not significantly reduced after intervention compared to placebo (SMD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.21 - 0.05, p = 0.23). LIMITATIONS: Five included studies were performed by the same research group with significant conflicts of interest. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis did not reveal a significant reduction in depression symptom severity in individuals with TRD after an adjunctive intervention with buprenorphine when compared to placebo. However, more optimal doses of buprenorphine (2 mg/day) and longer treatment lengths should be explored.