Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) ; 84(3): 372-397, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31213326

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Non-cardiac chest pain is defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by retrosternal pain similar to that of angina pectoris, but of non-cardiac origin and produced by esophageal, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, or psychiatric diseases. AIM: To present a consensus review based on evidence regarding the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain, as well as the therapeutic options for those patients. METHODS: Three general coordinators carried out a literature review of all articles published in English and Spanish on the theme and formulated 38 initial statements, dividing them into 3 main categories: (i)definitions, epidemiology, and pathophysiology; (ii)diagnosis, and (iii)treatment. The statements underwent 3rounds of voting, utilizing the Delphi system. The final statements were those that reached >75% agreement, and they were rated utilizing the GRADE system. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The final consensus included 29 statements. All patients presenting with chest pain should initially be evaluated by a cardiologist. The most common cause of non-cardiac chest pain is gastroesophageal reflux disease. If there are no alarm symptoms, the initial approach should be a therapeutic trial with a proton pump inhibitor for 2-4weeks. If dysphagia or alarm symptoms are present, endoscopy is recommended. High-resolution manometry is the best method for ruling out spastic motor disorders and achalasia and pH monitoring aids in demonstrating abnormal esophageal acid exposure. Treatment should be directed at the pathophysiologic mechanism. It can include proton pump inhibitors, neuromodulators and/or smooth muscle relaxants, psychologic intervention and/or cognitive therapy, and occasionally surgery or endoscopic therapy.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito/terapia , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Consenso , Humanos , México
2.
Arch Cardiol Mex ; 71(4): 319-23, 2001.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11806035

RESUMO

The association of AV nodal reentry tachycardia and interatrial septal defect has not been described previously. This article reports a 47-year-old woman with an atrial septal defect (ostium secundum) and history of palpitations without documental tachycardia through resting and ambulatory electrocardiography. Rapid atrial pacing under the influence of isoproterenol, during an electrophysiology study, elicited and AV nodal reentry tachycardia of the common type. Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed targeting the slow pathway. Immediately an Amplatzer device was used for closure of the septal defect. Both procedures were successful and without complications. What makes this case unusual is that both interventional procedures were performed during the same session.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter , Comunicação Interatrial/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Endocr Pract ; 4(2): 76-81, 1998.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15251749

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of major improvement in glycemic control on cardiovascular function tests in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). METHODS: Eight men with chronic, poorly controlled IDDM (serum fructosamine >300 mmol/L and mean fasting blood glucose >200 mg/dL), who were 24 +/- 6 years of age and had a mean duration of diabetes of 8 +/- 1 years, were studied. No patient had microalbuminuria, was taking medication other than insulin, or had evidence of heart disease. Patients underwent baseline continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, echocardiographic studies, and cardiovascular autonomic function tests, which were repeated after 4 weeks of an intensified insulin treatment program (IITP), during which they reached and maintained blood glucose concentrations and serum fructosamine levels in near-normal, nondiabetic ranges. RESULTS: Substantial changes in glycemic control had no significant influence on results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular autonomic function tests, and echocardiographic studies. CONCLUSION: Major improvement in glycemic control during a 1-month period in patients with IDDM had no significant influence on cardiovascular function tests. We cannot exclude the possibility that, after a longer duration of an IITP or in patients with clinically evident heart disease or evidence of major complications of diabetes, different responses might be observed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...