Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Skin Res Technol ; 19(1): e366-74, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22694144

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds require frequent dressing changes. Adhesive dressings used for this indication can be damaging to the stratum corneum, particularly in the elderly where the skin tends to be thinner. Understanding the level of damage caused by dressing removal can aid dressing selection. METHODS: This study used a novel methodology that applied a stain to the skin and measured the intensity of that stain after repeated application and removal of a series of different adhesive types. Additionally, a traditional method of measuring skin barrier damage (transepidermal water loss) was also undertaken and compared with the staining methodology. RESULTS: The staining methodology and measurement of transepidermal water loss differentiated the adhesive dressings, showing that silicone adhesives caused least trauma to the skin. CONCLUSION: The staining methodology was shown to be as effective as transepidermal water loss in detecting damage to the stratum corneum and was shown to detect disruption of the barrier earlier than the traditional technique.


Assuntos
Bandagens/efeitos adversos , Colorimetria/métodos , Epiderme/lesões , Epiderme/patologia , Dermatopatias/patologia , Fita Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Vesícula/etiologia , Vesícula/patologia , Água Corporal/metabolismo , Edema/etiologia , Edema/patologia , Epiderme/metabolismo , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Silício/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos , Perda Insensível de Água/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...