Long-term evaluation of the impact of delivery modalities on anal continence in women with Crohn's disease.

CONTEXT: Crohn's disease (CD) and sphincter injury during childbirth are two risk factors for anal incontinence (AI). The long-term risk of developing AI in women with CD after childbirth has never been studied. GOAL: The main objective of the study is to assess the risk of developing severe AI after childbirth in women with CD. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in women with CD who gave birth in a French "Level 3" maternity hospital between 2000 and 2015. The primary endpoint was severe AI as defined by a Wexner score≥9 or a St. Mark's score≥9, at least five years after childbirth. The association between delivery route and occurrence of severe AI was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Forty-six women were included, 32 of whom were delivered vaginally and 14 by Caesarean section. Thirty-one percent of the women had severe AI according to the Wexner score, and 41% according to the St. Mark's score. Two factors were associated with severe AI: vaginal delivery and the occurrence of an obstetric perineal injury: (crude OR=8.89, 95% (CI: 1.03-76.57) and crude OR=4.16, 95% (CI: 1.06-16.27) respectively for AI defined by the Wexner score, and crude OR=6.8, 95% (CI: 1.30-35.41) and crude OR=4.3, 95% (CI: 1.23-15.2) for AI defined by the St. Mark's score). After adjusting for confounding factors, only vaginal delivery was associated with severe AI (adjusted OR=22.86, 95% CI: 1.52-931.28 for a Wexner score≥9 and adjusted OR=16. 11 (95% CI: 1.43-533.26) for a St Mark score≥9). CONCLUSION: Vaginal birth was associated with the development of severe long-term AI in women with CD.

[Antenatal ultrasound prediction of esophageal atresia type]. / Prédiction échographique anténatale du type d'atrésie de l'œsophage.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital malformation of the upper aerodigestive tract, which can be diagnosed antenatally in 50-65% of cases. Postnatal management differs according to the type of EA. No studies have evaluated the correlation of antenatal ultrasound findings with the type of EA. OBJECTIVE: The main objective is to study the association between antenatal ultrasound signs and the type of EA. The secondary objective is to study the association between postnatal morbidity and the type of EA. METHOD: We conducted a single-center retrospective study between May 2010 and August 2019. Fetuses with suspected prenatal EA and postnatal diagnosis confirmation were included. Postnatal confirmation of EA was performed during surgery for live births and by fetopathological examination for termination of pregnancy. Prenatal signs and postnatal morbidity were compared according to the type of EA. RESULTS: We included 15 cases of postnatally confirmed EA, including 9 type 1EA, 5 type 3EA and 1 type 4EA (11 live births and 4 terminations of pregnancy). The gestational age at diagnosis was earlier in type 1EA: 22+0 [6-21,21-24] versus 30+0 [28+0-32+0] (P=0.03). Compared to type 3EA, type 1EA had a higher incidence of non-visible stomach bubble (89% versus 40%, P=0.09) and upper esophageal cul-de-sac dilatation (56% versus 0%, P=0.09). Neonatal morbidity in type 1EA was more severe with a longer hospital stay in neonatal intensive care. CONCLUSION: The antenatal ultrasound signs seem to be more pronounced in case of type 1EA. Type 1EA is associated with severe morbidity compared to Type 3EA. Improving prenatal diagnosis of EA and its type allows a more accurate prognostic evaluation.