RESUMO
Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rt-fMRI-nf) training is an emerging intervention for neurorehabilitation. However, its translation into clinical use on participants with clinical depression is unclear, the effect estimates from randomized control trials and the certainty of the supporting evidence on the effect estimates are unknown. As the number of studies on neurofeedback increases every year, and better quality evidence becomes available, we evaluate the evidence of all randomized control trials available on the clinical application of rt-fMRI-nf training on participants with clinical depression. We performed electronic searches in Pubmed, Embase, CENTRAL, rtFIN database, Epistemonikos, trial registers, reference lists, other systematic reviews, conference abstracts, and cross-citation in Google Scholar. Reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was judged using the GRADE framework. This review complies with PRISMA guidelines and was submitted to PROSPERO registration. We found 435 results. After the selection process, we included 11 reports corresponding to four RCTs. The effect of rt-fMRI-nf on improving the severity of clinical depression scores demonstrated a tendency to favor the intervention; however, the general effect was not significant. At end of treatment, SMD (standardized mean difference): -0.32 (95% CI -0.73 to 0.10). At follow-up, SMD: -0.33 (95% CI -0.91, 1.25). All the studies showed changes in BOLD fMRI activation after training; however, only one study confirmed regulation success during a transfer run. Whole-brain analyses suggests that rt-fMRI nf may alter activity patterns in brain networks. More studies are needed to evaluate quality of life, acceptability, adverse effects, cognitive tasks, and physiology measures. We conclude that the current evidence on the effect of rt-fMRI-nf training for decision-making outcomes in patients with clinical depression is still based on low certainty of the evidence.
RESUMO
Introduction: The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE), sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA), score for pneumonia severity (CURB-65) scales, a low phase angle (PA) and low muscle strength (MS) have demonstrated their prognostic risk for mortality in hospitalized adults. However, no study has compared the prognostic risk between these scales and changes in body composition in a single study in adults with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The great inflammation and complications that this disease presents promotes immobility and altered nutritional status, therefore a low PA and low MS could have a higher prognostic risk for mortality than the scales. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic risk for mortality of PA, MS, APACHE, SOFA, and CURB-65 in adults hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Methodology: This was a longitudinal study that included n = 104 SARS-CoV-2-positive adults hospitalized at General Hospital Penjamo, Guanajuato, Mexico, the PA was assessed using bioelectrical impedance and MS was measured with manual dynamometry. The following disease severity scales were applied as well: CURB-65, APACHE, and SOFA. Other variables analyzed were: sex, age, CO-RADS index, fat mass index, body mass index (BMI), and appendicular muscle mass index. A descriptive analysis of the study variables and a comparison between the group that did not survive and survived were performed, as well as a Cox regression to assess the predictive risk to mortality. Results: Mean age was 62.79 ± 15.02 years (31-96). Comparative results showed a mean PA of 5.43 ± 1.53 in the group that survived vs. 4.81 ± 1.72 in the group that died, p = 0.030. The mean MS was 16.61 ± 10.39 kg vs. 9.33 ± 9.82 in the group that died, p = 0.001. The cut-off points for low PA was determined at 3.66° and ≤ 5.0 kg/force for low grip strength. In the Cox multiple regression, a low PA [heart rate (HR) = 2.571 0.726, 95% CI = 1.217-5.430] and a low MS (HR = 4.519, 95% CI = 1.992-10.252) were associated with mortality. Conclusion: Phase angle and MS were higher risk predictors of mortality than APACHE, SOFA, and CURB-65 in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. It is important to include the assessment of these indicators in patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 and to be able to implement interventions to improve them.