A double blind comparative multicentre study of remoxipride and haloperidol in schizophrenia.

Seventy-two patients fulfilling the DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia and schizophreniform psychosis were admitted to a multicentre, double-blind controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remoxipride in comparison to haloperidol. The mean daily dose of remoxipride at the end of treatment was 353 mg and of haloperidol, 11 mg. Patients were assessed each week on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the symptoms checklist. No significant differences in efficacy were found between the two treatments. The median total BPRS score in the remoxipride group was 25 at start of active treatment and 17 at the last valid rating (n = 31). For the haloperidol group the corresponding figures were 24 and 15 (n = 29). According to the CGI, 40% of remoxipride patients and 50% of haloperidol patients were much or very much improved. Treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms, such as akathisia and rigidity, occurred significantly more frequently, and were more severe during treatment with haloperidol than with remoxipride (p = 0.012 and 0.024, respectively). Haloperidol-treated patients reported significantly more drowsiness and increased sleep during treatment (p = 0.026 and 0.012, respectively). No statistically significant differences were seen in endocrine or autonomic symptoms. Remoxipride seemed to be as effective as haloperidol, had a lower frequency of side effects, and was used safely in the dose range 150-600 mg/day.

Paroxetine: pharmacokinetic and antidepressant effect in the elderly.

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and tolerability of paroxetine in elderly depressed patients, a clinical study was set up--initially at Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital in Denmark, and subsequently at the University Hospital in Linköping, Sweden. A total of 21 patients with a median age of 72 years were included in the study. After a single dose of 20 or 30 mg of paroxetine followed by two drug-free days, treatment continued with 20 or 30 mg daily for seven weeks. The majority of patients showed a continuous reduction in their HAMD scores, starting in the second week of treatment. Paroxetine was well tolerated at the doses given, and side-effects were mostly mild and transient. Steady-state, pre-dose plasma levels of paroxetine showed considerable variability, and the median steady-state concentration was higher in elderly patients compared with data from a previous study in young volunteers. Elimination half-lives also showed variability between these elderly patients, but tended to be longer after cessation of multiple dosing than after a single dose. They also tended to be longer than in the young volunteers. The results of this study do not advocate reduced doses of paroxetine in the elderly, but further studies are warranted.