RESUMO
Background: Fingerprint drug concentrations can be used as a noninvasive and convenient alternative to evaluate adherence to pharmacotherapy. Methods: Fingerprints were applied over glass slides, extracted and analyzed by ultra-high performance LC-MS/MS. The assay and drug adherence questionnaires were applied to 30 epilepsy patients. Results: The assay had linearity in the range 0.05-10 ng fingerprint-1, with precision of 2.16-7.9% and accuracy of 95.0-102.8%. Carbamazepine (CBZ) levels in fingerprints were stable at 45°C for 15 days. Concentrations in patient samples were 0.06-9.28 ng fingerprint-1. A significant difference (p = 0.003) was found between CBZ concentrations in fingerprints between patient groups divided as low and medium/high adherence. Conclusion: This method can potentially be applied to the identification of epilepsy patients with low adherence to CBZ pharmacotherapy.
[Box: see text].
Assuntos
Carbamazepina , Epilepsia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Adesão à Medicação , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Masculino , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Dermatoglifia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The use of dried blood spots (DBS) has gained interest in the field of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) due to its potential advantages, such as minimally invasive capillary blood collection, potential stabilization of drugs and metabolites at room or high temperatures, and lower biohazard, allowing for inexpensive storage and transportation. However, there are several drawbacks to the clinical use of DBS in TDM, mostly related to hematocrit (Hct) effects, differences between venous and capillary blood concentrations, among others, that must be evaluated during analytical and clinical method validation. AREA COVERED: This review focuses on the most recent publications on the applications of DBS sampling for TDM (2016-2022), with a special focus on the challenges presented by this alternative sampling strategy, as well as the opportunities for clinical applications. Real-life studies presenting clinical applications were reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: With the availability of method development and validation guidelines for DBS-based methods in TDM, higher levels of assay validation standardization have been achieved, expanding the clinical applications of DBS sampling in patient care. New sampling devices that overcome the limitations of classical DBS, such as the Hct effects, will further encourage the use of DBS in routine TDM.
