Prospective study comparing skin impedance with EEG parameters during the induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl and etomidate.

OBJECTIVE: Sympathetic stimulation leads to a change in electrical skin impedance. So far it is unclear whether this effect can be used to measure the effects of anaesthetics during general anaesthesia. The aim of this prospective study is to determine the electrical skin impedance during induction of anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery with fentanyl and etomidate. METHODS: The electrical skin impedance was measured with the help of an electro-sympathicograph (ESG). In 47 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, anaesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanyl 10 mug/kg and etomidate 0.3mg/kg. During induction, the ESG (Electrosympathicograph), BIS (Bispectral IndeX), BP (arterial blood pressure) and HR (heart rate) values of each patient were recorded every 20 seconds.The observation period from administration of fentanyl to intubation for surgery lasted 4 min. - RESULTS: The ESG recorded significant changes in the electrical skin impedance after administration of fentanyl and etomidate(p <0.05). During induction of anaesthesia, significant changes of BIS, HR and blood pressure were observed as well (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The electrical skin impedance measurement may be used to monitor the effects of anesthetics during general anaesthesia.

[Cognitive dysfunction after abdominal surgery in elderly patients]. / Kognitive Dysfunktionen nach abdominal-chirurgischen Operationen bei älteren Patienten.

Elderly patients often suffer from postoperative cognitive deficits (POCD) after serious surgical operations. The reasons for this are not well understood. We investigated the influence of the invasiveness of the operation and the duration of the operation as well as the patient's preoperative physical status on measures of cognitive dysfunction. In a prospective study 59 elderly patients (mean age 69.2 years) were subjected to a neuropsychological test battery and a questionnaire following an abdominal surgical operation. The postoperative recovery with a focus on memory function was assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) seven days after the operation. Self-reported cognitive deficits were studied using the a questionnaire of experienced attention deficits (FEDA) three months after the operation. Postoperative psychological and self-reported test results varied as a function of the invasiveness and the duration of the operation. After more invasive operations patients reported a stronger deficit in activities of daily living and a reduction in drive than after less invasive operations. In addition, the duration of anesthesia influenced the experienced deficits. The self-reported deficits were more strongly influenced by the features of the operation than the psychological test data. The physical status of the patients according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) along with the duration of anesthesia as covariate was identified as a good predictor for the cognitive recovery post operation.

Cortical activity assessed by Narcotrend in relation to haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation at different stages of cortical suppression and reflex control.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many anaesthesiologists still interpret haemodynamic responses as signs of insufficient cortical suppression. The aim was to illustrate how haemodynamics may only poorly reflect the level of cortical suppression and that electroencephalographic monitoring could indicate different relationships between cortical effects and haemodynamics. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)), and fentanyl (2 microg kg(-1)) with succinylcholine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) for neuromuscular blockade in the 11 patients of Group 1. In Group 2 (n = 15), thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)) and succinylcholine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) were given. In Group 3, the patients (n = 13) received thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)), fentanyl (2 microg kg(-1)) and cisatracurium (0.1 mg kg(-1)), and they were intubated 3 min later than the patients in Groups 1 and 2. We determined conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) variables and classified 14 EEG stages in real-time ranging from A (= 1), indicating full wakefulness, to F1 (= 14), at profound cortical suppression. RESULTS: All groups had profound cortical suppression 45 s after thiopental administration, which rapidly decreased (EEG stage, 11 (6-13) versus 7 (2-13) at 4 min, P < 0.0001). Decreasing EEG stages were associated with increasing SEF 95, relative alpha and beta power and decreasing relative delta power. During tracheal intubation, profound cortical suppression remained unchanged in Groups 1 and 2. In Group 3, cortical suppression had decreased before laryngoscopy (P < 0.005). In Group 2, 11 patients had heart rate responses to tracheal intubation, whereas only two responded in Group 1 (P = 0.015) and three in Group 3 (P = 0.02). Thirteen patients in Group 2 had arterial pressure responses, and five in Group 1 (P = 0.038). Circulatory responses did not differ between Groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: Electroencephalographic monitoring was suitable to indicate in real-time that haemodynamics only poorly reflect rapidly changing levels of cortical suppression, and how haemodynamics and cortical activity depend on the applied combination of hypnotic and analgesic drugs during anaesthesia induction with thiopental.

Postoperative reading speed does not indicate implicit memory in elderly cardiac patients after propofol and remifentanyl anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: A recent study in young patients undergoing propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia demonstrated implicit memory for stories presented during operation using a postoperative reading speed task. In this study we investigated whether patients who tolerate only small amounts of anaesthetics are prone to develop implicit and explicit memories about intraoperative events. METHODS: Thirty patients with poor physical status (ASA III-IV) undergoing cardioverter defibrillator implantation were included in the study. Patients were premedicated with intravenous midazolam and anaesthesia was maintained using propofol and remifentanil infusions. During surgery one of two audio-tapes containing two short stories was played to the patients. Reading speed for the stories played during surgery and two similar stories from the other tape was tested 4 h later. Explicit memory was tested at 4 h and 24 h after audiotape presentation using a structured interview and a forced-choice recognition test pertaining to the story content. Thirty additional awake subjects served as controls. RESULTS: Although half of the patients seemed to be awake one or more times during the operation, no explicit memories of intraoperative events were reported. The forced-choice recognition of the stories was at chance level. No effect on reading speed was found in either the patients or the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The possible reasons for reduced explicit and implicit memory performance in elderly patients are age and poor physical status of the patients and the modality change between study and test phases. A non-anaesthetised control group of the same age and physical status should therefore be included in all studies of implicit memory.

[Stand-by and conscious sedation--possibilities and limits of anesthesiological management]. / Stand-by und Analgosedierung--Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der anästhesiologischen Betreuung.

Monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) offers patients more comfort during long and painful procedures than local anaesthesia alone. The spectrum of monitored anaesthesia care has expanded quantitatively and qualitatively during the last few years. Commonly-used sedative and analgesic drugs during MAC are propofol, midazolam, S-ketamine, remifentanil and piritramide. All substances used alone or in combination can lead to respiratory or haemodynamic complications. Therefore, they should be carefully titrated to the desired effect. The same standards as for general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia are required for monitoring devices and other equipment. Clinical monitoring during MAC should be carried out by an experienced anaesthetist.

General anesthesia for interventional neuroradiology: propofol versus isoflurane.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare recovery of psychomotor and cognitive ability after isoflurane and propofol-based general anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective, blinded interventional study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 24 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing embolization procedures for intracranial vascular lesions. INTERVENTIONS: Isoflurane anesthesia or propofol anesthesia was given to patients. MEASUREMENTS: Awakening time; early recovery (5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes) was assessed using orientation and Steward tests; medium recovery (30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes) was tested using Controlled World Association (COWAT) and Digit Span tests; late recovery (4 hours, 24 hours) was assessed using a Verbal Learning and Memory Test and three subtests of a computerized attention test battery. MAIN RESULTS: Awakening time and early recovery of motor and respiratory function did not differ between groups. The propofol group scored worse in COWAT and Digit Span tests up to 60 minutes after anesthesia. Both groups showed an impairment of higher cognitive functions up to 24 hours after anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Both isoflurane- and propofol-based anesthesia allow early extubation and recovery of basic psychomotor functions. More sophisticated tests show a decline of cognitive functions up to 24 hours after isoflurane- as well as propofol-based anesthesia. Because both anesthetics show similar recovery of psychomotor functions after long duration anesthesia, other factors such as subjective well-being and costs may be considered when deciding between these two anesthetics.

Using intranasal midazolam spray to prevent claustrophobia induced by MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 37% of patients undergoing MR imaging examinations experience moderate to severe levels of anxiety that necessitate the termination of the procedure in 5-10% of patients. Although the clinical use of MR imaging has increased, effective procedures to handle claustrophobia are lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness of intranasally administered midazolam spray in preventing claustrophobic responses of patients undergoing MR imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients scheduled for MR imaging were included in this prospective study. Anxiety and sedation of patients were evaluated before drug administration, immediately before MR imaging, and at the end of the procedure. The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the visual analogue scale of anxiety, and a five-point sedation scale were used. Half the patients received intranasal spray applications of 4 mg midazolam, whereas the other patients received a placebo, in a randomized, double-blind study design (six sprayings of 0.5% midazolam solution or NaCl 0.9%, respectively). The intensity of the sensation of burning of the nasal mucosa was rated by patients using a three-point scale (no, slight, or strong burning). The quality of scan images was evaluated by a radiologist using a five-point scale (0 = extremely poor, 5 = excellent). RESULTS: No cancellations occurred with patients who received midazolam, whereas four of 27 patients receiving placebo panicked and terminated the scanning procedure. The initial anxiety and sedation scores did not differ between the groups. Patients who received midazolam spray were more sedated and less anxious immediately before entering the MR scanner and reported a more intense slight transient burning of the nasal mucosa than those in the placebo group. The quality of the MR image was higher in the midazolam group. CONCLUSION: A sizeable reduction in MR imaging-related anxiety and improved MR image quality were seen with patients who received intranasal midazolam spray. With the exception of transient burning of the nasal mucosa, no adverse effects were reported. This simple and safe method is useful in sedating patients for MR imaging and other minor procedures.

Anaesthesia with propofol decreases FMLP-induced neutrophil respiratory burst but not phagocytosis compared with isoflurane.

Propofol has been reported to produce a dose-dependent inhibition of phagocytosis and superoxide anion production during the respiratory burst (RB) of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) in vitro. In this randomized, blinded study, these two parameters were compared during propofol or isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective interventional embolization of cerebral arterio-venous malformations. Anaesthesia was performed with continuous intravenous propofol 6-8 mg kg-1 h-1 (n = 15) or isoflurane 0.8-1.0% end tidal (n = 15). Heparinized blood was drawn before, and 2 and 4 h after induction of anaesthesia. The RB in isolated leucocytes was measured with the fluorescent dye rhodamine after ex vivo induction by Escherichia coli or tumour necrosis factor alpha/N-formyl-methionyl-leucylphenylalanine (TNF-alpha/FMLP). Phagocytosis was carried out in whole blood after incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled, opsonized E. coli and also measured with a flow cytometer. The two groups were similar in terms of biometric data and haemodynamic responsiveness. After 4 h of propofol or isoflurane anesthesia, the mean (SD) phagocytosis of E. coli was 93.2% (7.0%) and 94.3% (9.2%), respectively, of that before anaesthesia. The percentage of PMN with RB activity following TNF-alpha/FMLP stimulation was significantly reduced after 2 h (80.9% (24.2%); P < 0.05) and 4 h (53.7% (27.3); P < 0.05) of anaesthesia with propofol compared with the values before induction. This effect of propofol anaesthesia was significantly different from the effect of isoflurane anaesthesia. In contrast to published in vitro results, 4 h of anaesthesia with propofol did not reduce the phagocytotic capacity of human blood PMN more than isoflurane anaesthesia.

No implicit memory for stories played during isoflurane/alfentanil/nitrous oxide anesthesia: a reading speed measurement.

UNLABELLED: Implicit memory of intraoperatively presented stories was recently detected by using the reading speed paradigm during propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Our main goal was to evaluate the reading speed test procedure under another anesthetic regimen, i.e., isoflurane combined with nitrous oxide and alfentanil-infusion. In both experiments, patients were premedicated with oral midazolam. In a previous experiment, patients postoperatively read "old" stories that had been presented during anesthesia quicker compared with "new," unpresented stories. The same study design and test material as in the previous experiment were used. One of two audio tapes with two short stories was played randomly to patients during lumbar disk surgery and to awake controls. Approximately 7 h later, a structured interview and the reading speed test were used to determine whether the participants had any explicit or implicit memories of the presented stories. The results of 30 patients and 30 controls were calculated. Whereas the control participants showed an intact explicit and implicit memory of the previously presented material, no such effect was found in the anesthetized patients. The present experiment shows that changing the main anesthetic in otherwise equal study conditions, i. e., propofol to isoflurane (end-expiratory 0.7%), implicit memory is abolished in anesthetized patients. IMPLICATIONS: We showed that implicit memory during general anesthesia can be abolished by changing the hypnotic anesthetic. Increased postoperative reading speed for stories presented during propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia was shown in a previous experiment, but not in our study using isoflurane for balanced anesthesia.

Increased reading speed for stories presented during general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of explicit memories such as the recall and recognition of intraoperative events, memory of auditory information played during general anesthesia has been demonstrated with several tests of implicit memory. In contrast to explicit memory, which requires conscious recollection, implicit memory does not require recollection of previous experiences and is evidenced by a priming effect on task performance. The authors evaluated the effect of a standardized anesthetic technique on implicit memory, first using a word stem completion task, and then a reading speed task in a subsequent study. METHODS: While undergoing lumbar disc surgery, 60 patients were exposed to auditory materials via headphones in two successive experiments. A balanced intravenous technique with propofol and alfentanil infusions and a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture was used to maintain adequate anesthesia. In the first experiment, 30 patients were exposed randomly to one of the two lists of 34 repeated German nouns; in the second experiment, 30 patients were exposed to one of two tapes containing two short stories. Thirty control patients for each experiment heard the tapes without receiving anesthesia. All patients were tested for implicit memory 6-8 h later: A word stem completion task for the words and a reading speed task for the stories were used as measures of implicit memory. RESULTS: The control group completed the word stems significantly more often with the words that they had heard previously, but no such effect was found in the anesthetized group. However, both the control and patient groups showed a decreased reading time of about 40 ms per word for the previously presented stories compared with the new stories. The patients had no explicit memory of intraoperative events. CONCLUSIONS: Implicit memory was demonstrated after anesthesia by the reading speed task but not by the word stem completion task. Some methodologic aspects, such as using low frequency words or varying study and test modalities, may account for the negative results of the word stem completion task. Another explanation is that anesthesia with propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide suppressed the word priming but not the reading speed measure of implicit memory. The reading speed paradigm seems to provide a stable and reliable measurement of implicit memory.