RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, there are just several studies comparing distal locked nails with distal unlocked nails in treating intertrochanteric fractures. We report the first meta-analysis about this issue. METHODS: Systematic search was conducted for studies in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Meta-analyses were performed regarding intra operative outcomes, complications and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Pooled results showed insignificant difference between distal locking group and distal unlocking group in hip pain (relative risk (RR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-2.19), distal tip fracture (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.37-3.11), lag screw cut-out (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.54-4.78), delayed or nonunion (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.25-7.06), deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.23-4.84), wound infection (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28-1.22), Harris hip score (standard mean deviation (SMD) 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.21) and walking ability. However, significant difference was detected in operation time (SMD 0.77, 95% CI 0.36-1.17), fluoroscopy exposure time (SMD 1.02, 95% CI 0.52-1.52), blood loss (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-0.99) and total incision length (SMD 1.16, 95% CI 0.86-1.47). Result of trial sequential analysis indicated conclusive evidence. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that the distal locked intramedullary nails should not be recommended as routine choice for stable intertrochanteric fractures.
