Research on Multimedia Music Teaching Based on Artificial Intelligence.

In order to improve the efficiency of music teaching, this paper constructs a multimedia music teaching system based on artificial intelligence. Moreover, this paper focuses on the technical research of intraframe prediction, intraframe filtering, and transformation technology, respectively proposes the intraframe prediction method based on brightness change and the intraframe filtering technique based on the iterative update, and respectively proposes corresponding optimization algorithms. In addition, this paper proposes intraframe prediction technology based on brightness changes and intraframe filtering technology based on an iterative update, which brings improvements in coding performance, analyzes and verifies the experimental results, and proposes corresponding optimization algorithms, respectively, which saves coding and decoding time. Finally, this paper constructs a corresponding model structure based on actual needs, and analyzes the performance of this model through experimental research. The research results show that the teaching system constructed in this paper has better performance.

TSC/MTOR -associated Eosinophilic Renal Tumors Exhibit a Heterogeneous Clinicopathologic Spectrum : A Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Gene Expression Profiling Study.

BACKGROUND: Several TSC1/2- or MTOR -mutated eosinophilic renal tumor subsets are emerging, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumors (EVTs) and low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOTs). "Unclassified renal tumors with TSC/MTOR mutations" ( TSC -mt RCC-NOS) do not meet the criteria for other histomolecular subtypes. Whether these tumors represent a continuum of 1 TS C/ MTOR -mutation-associated disease is unknown. DESIGN: We evaluated the clinicopathologic and IHC profiles of 39 eosinophilic renal tumors with targeted DNA sequencing-confirmed TSC/MTOR mutations. Twenty-eight of these, plus 6 ChRCC, 5 RO, 5 ccRCC, 7 MiT RCC and 6 normal renal tissues, were profiled transcriptionally by RNA-seq. RESULTS: The 39 cases were reclassified based on morphological and IHC features as ESC RCC (12), EVT (9), LOT, (8) and TSC -mt RCC-NOS (10). The mutation profiles demonstrated consistency; ESC RCCs (12/12) had TSC mutations, and most LOTs (7/8) had MTOR mutations. Ten TSC -mt RCC-NOSs exhibited heterogeneous morphology, arising a differential diagnosis with other renal tumors, including MiT RCC, PRCC and epithelioid PEComa. RNA sequencing-based clustering segregated ESC RCC, EVT and LOT from each other and other renal tumors, indicating expression profile-level differences. Most TSC- mt RCC-NOSs (6/7) formed a mixed cluster with ESC RCC, indicating similar expression signatures; one TSC- mt RCC-NOS with unusual biphasic morphology clustered with EVT. CONCLUSIONS: We expanded the TSC/MTOR -associated eosinophilic renal tumor morphologic spectrum, identified gene mutation characteristics, and highlighted differential diagnosis challenges, especially with MiT RCC. ESC RCC, EVT, and LOT having distinct expression profiles. TSC -mt RCC-NOS may cluster with recognized TSC/MTOR -associated entities.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma: further support for the newly proposed entity.

The classification of renal neoplasms continues to evolve with novel, emerging, and provisional entities being described constantly. Biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma (BHP RCC) associated with somatic NF2 mutations is one such new renal entity and is considered as a provisional category of RCC due to its very limited data. To provide further support for the newly proposed entity, we identified three additional cases of BHP RCC, with clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and various molecular analyses. There were 2 males and 1 female, aged 65, 56, and 69 years, respectively. The neoplasms were unencapsulated, and all had a characteristic biphasic appearance of smaller cells clustering around basement membrane material within larger acini, forming pseudorosettes or a glomeruloid pattern. Hyalinized sclerotic stroma and psammoma bodies were abundant in two cases and focally present in one case. Focal areas of a less distinctive appearance were also noted; one additionally had an elongated tubular pattern in the myxoid stroma that is reminiscent of mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma; one consisted solid alveolar architectures of epithelioid clear cells, bearing some resemblance to clear cell RCC. The neoplasms did not have a distinctive immunohistochemistry (IHC) profile, though all labeled for vimentin and CK7. Targeted DNA sequencing revealed that one case harbored a pathogenic somatic frameshift mutation in the NF2 gene, which was further confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The other two cases lacked NF2 mutations and instead demonstrated NF2 promoter methylation by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Subsequent IHC assessment showed loss of expression of NF2 in all 3 cases, which evaluated NF2 status at the protein level. According to RNA sequencing-based clustering analysis, the 3 cases formed a distinct group with a shared specific transcriptional profile different from that of other established renal tumor types. In addition, phosphate inositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway was enriched significantly and on the top of all enriched pathways. Clinically, one patient developed bone metastases and died of disease two years after diagnosis. The other two patients had no evidence of recurrence or metastases, at 4- and 5-year follow-up. These findings not only validate previously described clinicopathological features but also expand the potentially genetic alterations and available clinical outcome data.

Malignant melanotic Xp11 neoplasms exhibit a clinicopathologic spectrum and gene expression profiling akin to alveolar soft part sarcoma: a proposal for reclassification.

The classification of the distinct group of mesenchymal neoplasms, first described as 'Xp11 translocation perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa)' and for which the term 'melanotic Xp11 neoplasm' or 'Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation' has recently been proposed, remains challenging and controversial. We collected 27 melanotic Xp11 neoplasms, the largest series to date, for a comprehensive evaluation. Fourteen of the cases, together with eight alveolar soft part sarcomas (ASPS), nine conventional PEComas and a control group of seven normal tissues were submitted to RNA sequencing. Follow-up available in 22 patients showed 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival of 47.6 and 35.7%, respectively, which were similar to ASPS and significantly worse than conventional PEComa. Univariate analysis of location (occurring in the kidney versus not kidney), infiltrative growth pattern, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity ≥2/50 high-power fields (HPF), necrosis and lymphovascular invasion were found to be associated with overall survival and/or disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis identified that location was the only factor found to independently correlate with disease-free survival. More importantly, RNA sequencing-based clustering analysis segregated melanotic Xp11 neoplasm and ASPS from other tumors, including conventional PEComa and Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma, and formed a compact cluster representative of the largely similar expression signature. Here we clearly define the true biologic nature of melanotic Xp11 neoplasms which are distinctive malignant mesenchymal tumors, rather than simply PEComa variants with occasionally unpredictable behavior. Meanwhile, melanotic Xp11 neoplasm and ASPS more likely represent phenotypic variants of the same entity, which is distinct from conventional PEComa and Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Based on these important findings, melanotic Xp11 neoplasm might be reclassified into a distinctive entity together with ASPS, independent from PEComa, in future revisions of the current WHO categories of tumors of soft tissue and bone for the improved reclassification. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Inactivation of BRM/SMARCA2 sensitizes clear cell renal cell carcinoma to histone deacetylase complex inhibitors.

BRM, a key subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, is an important tumor suppressor gene in multiple tumors. BRM is not mutated, but rather epigenetically silenced in a variety of tumor types, which is different from many anti-cancer genes. In addition, histone deacetylase complex (HDAC) inhibitors are known to reverse BRM silencing, but they also inactivate it via acetylation of its c-terminus. HDAC inhibitors have been reported to be effective at pharmacologically restoring BRM and thereby inhibiting cancer cell growth. But we do not know which HDAC inhibitor, if any, regulate BRM in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). By using seven types of HDAC inhibitors, we found that Pan-HDAC inhibitors restored BRM protein expression. Despite their ability to restore BRM expression, these HDAC inhibitors also blocked BRM function when present. However, after their removal, we observed that BRM expression remained elevated for several days, and during this period, BRM activity was detected. In addition, HDAC3 and HDAC9 regulate BRM expression and function, especially for HDAC3 inhibitor, RGFP966. Our study demonstrated that knockdown of BRM promoted RCC cells proliferation, migration and invasion. RGFP966 inhibited the tumor progression of clear cell RCC by restoring BRM expression both in vivo and in vitro. In conclusion, HDAC3 is potential targets for clinical treatment, and our study provides a new approach for targeted therapy of BRM-negative clear cell RCC.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of the TFEB Fusion Variant Reveals New Members of TFEB Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas (RCCs): Expanding the Genomic Spectrum.

Xp11 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with different gene fusions may have different clinicopathologic features. We sought to identify variant fusions in TFEB translocation RCC. A total of 31 cases of TFEB RCCs were selected for the current study; MALAT1-TFEB fusion was identified in 25 cases (81%, 25/31) using fusion probes. The remaining 6 cases (19%, 6/31) were further analyzed by RNA sequencing and 5 of them were detected with TFEB-associated gene fusions, including 2 ACTB-TFEB, 1 EWSR1-TFEB, 1 CLTC-TFEB, and 1 potential PPP1R10-TFEB (a paracentric inversion of the TFEB gene, consistent with "negative" TFEB split FISH result, and advising a potential diagnostic pitfall in detecting TFEB gene rearrangement). Four of the 5 fusion transcripts were successfully validated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Morphologically, approximately one third (29%, 9/31) of TFEB RCCs showed typical biphasic morphology. The remaining two thirds of the cases (71%, 22/31) exhibited nonspecific morphology, with nested, sheet-like, or papillary architecture, resembling other types of renal neoplasms, such as clear cell RCC, Xp11 RCC, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), or papillary RCC. Although cases bearing a MALAT1-TFEB fusion demonstrated variable morphologies, all 9 cases featuring typical biphasic morphology were associated with MALAT1-TFEB genotype. Accordingly, typical biphasic morphology suggests MALAT1-TFEB fusion, whereas atypical morphology did not suggest the specific type of fusion. Isolated or clustered eosinophilic cells were a common feature in TFEB RCCs, which may be a useful morphology diagnostic clue for TFEB RCCs. Clinicopathologic variables assessment showed that necrosis was the only morphologic feature that correlated with the aggressive behavior of TFEB RCC (P=0.004). In summary, our study expands the genomic spectrum and the clinicopathologic features of TFEB RCCs, and highlights the challenges of diagnosis and the importance of subtyping of this tumor by combining morphology and multiple molecular techniques.

Hypermethylation of BRM promoter plays oncogenic roles in development of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Although the inactivation of BRM plays oncogenic roles in tumorigenesis, regulation mechanism is rarely studied in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thus, we aimed to investigate the mechanism of BRM inactivation and explore the tumor suppressing roles of BRM in the development of clear cell RCC. We verified that hypermethylation of the BRM promoter was correlated with decreased expression of BRM by multi-omics analysis based on the TCGA database. This result was further confirmed in our own tumor tissues. Moreover, BRM inhibited the ability of proliferation and invasion of RCC cells in vitro. Consistent with this, BRM overexpressing virtually inhibited the xenograft tumor growth of ACHN cells in vivo. Finally we found that BRM promoted cell apoptosis and cellular cycle arrest in G2/M. In conclusion, our study confirms that the hypermethylation of BRM promoters plays oncogenic roles by the transcription inhibition of BRM in RCC, and the tumor suppressor gene BRM inhibits RCC cell vitality in vitro and in vivo.

Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed distinct clinicopathologic and molecular features of VCL-ALK RCC: A unique case from an older patient without clinical evidence of sickle cell trait.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a novel entity of rare tumors with only 10 cases reported in the literature. Three RCC cases bearing VCL-ALK gene fusion were all young African American patients and associated with sickle cell trait notably. In contrast to the 3 reported cases, this neoplasm occurred in a middle-age woman (57 years old) without any evidence of sickle cell trait and demonstrated an infiltrating growth pattern with tubular, tubulopapillary, and tubulocystic structures, overlapping with collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma. Abundant intraluminal mucin was also noted significantly in the histologic sections. Immunostaining showed strong membranous labeling for ALK protein. We applied a large panel-targeted next-generation sequencing to explore the molecular alterations in the current case, revealing a driver oncogene VCL-ALK gene fusion co-occurring with pathogenic mutations in EP300 and TRRAP genes. Thereafter, fluorescence in situ hybridization assay was used to detect the ALK gene rearrangement. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed the presence of a VCL-ALK gene fusion, a fusion of VCL exon 16 to ALK exon 20. Our report draws the attention to the possibility that VCL-ALK genotype can be involved in older patients unassociated with sickle cell trait, also expanding the spectrum to ALK-rearranged RCC.

RNA sequencing of Xp11 translocation-associated cancers reveals novel gene fusions and distinctive clinicopathologic correlations.

Both Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas and the corresponding mesenchymal neoplasms are characterized by a variety of gene fusions involving TFE3. It has been known that tumors with different gene fusions may have different clinicopathologic features; however, further in-depth investigations of subtyping Xp11 translocation-associated cancers are needed in order to explore more meaningful clinicopathologic correlations. A total of 22 unusual cases of Xp11 translocation-associated cancers were selected for the current study; 20 cases were further analyzed by RNA sequencing to explore their TFE3 gene fusion partners. RNA sequencing identified 17 of 20 cases (85%) with TFE3-associated gene fusions, including 4 ASPSCR1/ASPL-TFE3, 3 PRCC-TFE3, 3 SFPQ/PSF-TFE3, 1 NONO-TFE3, 4 MED15-TFE3, 1 MATR3-TFE3, and 1 FUBP1-TFE3. The results have been verified by fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The remaining 2 cases with specific pathologic features highly suggestive of MED15-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma were identified by fusion FISH assay. We provide the detailed morphologic and immunophenotypic description of the MED15-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, which frequently demonstrate extensively cystic architecture, similar to multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, and expressed cathepsin K and melanotic biomarker Melan A. This is the first time to correlate the MED15-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma with specific clinicopathologic features. We also report the first case of the corresponding mesenchymal neoplasm with MED15-TFE3 gene fusion. Additional novel TFE3 gene fusion partners, MATR3 and FUBP1, were identified. Cases with ASPSCR1-TFE3, SFPQ-TFE3, PRCC-TFE3, and NONO-TFE3 gene fusion showed a wide variability in morphologic features, including invasive tubulopapillary pattern simulating collecting duct carcinoma, extensive calcification and ossification, and overlapping and high columnar cells with nuclear grooves mimicking tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Furthermore, we respectively evaluated the ability of TFE3 immunohistochemistry, TFE3 FISH, RT-PCR, and RNA sequencing to subclassify Xp11 translocation-associated cancers. In summary, our study expands the list of TFE3 gene fusion partners and the clinicopathologic features of Xp11 translocation-associated cancers, and highlights the importance of subtyping Xp11 translocation-associated cancers combining morphology, immunohistochemistry, and multiple molecular techniques.

Novel gene fusion of PRCC-MITF defines a new member of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological analysis and detection of the gene fusion by RNA sequencing and FISH.

AIMS: MITF, TFE3, TFEB and TFEC belong to the same microphthalmia-associated transcription factor family (MiT). Two transcription factors in this family have been identified in two unusual types of renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Xp11 translocation RCC harbouring TFE3 gene fusions and t(6;11) RCC harbouring a MALAT1-TFEB gene fusion. The 2016 World Health Organisation classification of renal neoplasia grouped these two neoplasms together under the category of MiT family translocation RCC. RCCs associated with the other two MiT family members, MITF and TFEC, have rarely been reported. Herein, we identify a case of MITF translocation RCC with the novel PRCC-MITF gene fusion by RNA sequencing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Histological examination of the present tumour showed typical features of MiT family translocation RCCs, overlapping with Xp11 translocation RCC and t(6;11) RCC. However, this tumour showed negative results in TFE3 and TFEB immunochemistry and split fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) assays. The other MiT family members, MITF and TFEC, were tested further immunochemically and also showed negative results. RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed the presence of a PRCC-MITF gene fusion: a fusion of PRCC exon 5 to MITF exon 4. We then developed FISH assays covering MITF break-apart probes and PRCC-MITF fusion probes to detect the MITF gene rearrangement. CONCLUSIONS: This study both proves the recurring existence of MITF translocation RCC and expands the genotype spectrum of MiT family translocation RCCs.

EWSR1 rearrangement is present in a subset of myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands with variable morphology and does not correlate with clinical behavior.

To investigate that whether myoepithelial tumors of salivary glands (MTs) with EWSR1 rearrangement display distinctive morphological characteristics and whether EWSR1 detection aids to distinguish malignant myoepithelial tumors (MMTs) from benign myoepithelial tumors (BMTs) of salivary glands. We examined 37 cases of MTs, including 24 BMTs, 13 MMTs, by histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis. All of 37 cases were immunoreactive for CKpan, and at least one myoepithelial marker. 26 of 37 cases of MTs were available to be analyzed for EWSR1 rearrangement, with the result that EWSR1 gene break was detected in 4 cases of 15 BMTs, and 4 cases of 11 MMTs. In addition, the 8 EWSR1-rearranged cases displayed not exactly similar morphological features, covering 4 clear-cell cases, 1 plasmacytoid-cell case, 1 spindle-cell case, 1 epithelioid-cell case, and 1 chordoid-cell case. Our study proposed that EWSR1 rearrangement was present in a subset of MTs, with variable morphological features. Moreover, the presence of EWSR1 rearrangement could not be a forceful evidence to distinguish MMTs from BBTs.

Xp11 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinomas (RCCs) With RBM10-TFE3 Gene Fusion Demonstrating Melanotic Features and Overlapping Morphology With t(6;11) RCC: Interest and Diagnostic Pitfall in Detecting a Paracentric Inversion of TFE3.

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are characterized by several different translocations involving the TFE3 gene. Tumors with different specific gene fusions may have different clinicopathologic manifestations. Only 3 RBM10-TFE3 RCCs have been reported to date. Here, we added 4 cases of this rare type of tumors with clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, molecular, and ultrastructural analyses. Most tumors had similar patterns with mixed architectures as follows: acinar, tubular and papillary patterns of epithelioid cells combined with sheets of small cells with "pseudorosette-like" architectures, mimicking the typical morphology of t(6;11) RCC. Cytoplasmic vacuolization, nuclear groove, and psammoma bodies were observed in most cases. Immunohistochemically, all 4 cases demonstrated moderate to strong immunoreactivity for TFE3, Cathepsin K, CD10, Ksp-cadherin, E-cadherin, P504S, RCC marker, PAX8 and vimentin, whereas negativity for TFEB, HMB45, and CK7. CKpan and Melan-A were at least focally expressed. The antibody to Ki-67 showed labeling of 3% to 8% (mean, 5%) of tumor cell nuclei. ;Of interest, several immunostainings demonstrated expression discrepancy in different histology patterns. RBM10-TFE3 fusion transcripts were identified in all cases by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. By fluorescence in situ hybridization, all 4 cases showed unusual split signals with a distance <1 signal diameter (co-localized or subtle split signals) and usually had false-negative results. We also observed ultrastructures, including melanin pigment, nuclear groove, numerous glycogens, mitochondrion with areas of high electron density material, basement membrane material, and cell junctions with poor development. All 4 patients were alive with no evidence of recurrent disease. Our report adds to the known data regarding RBM10-TFE3 RCC.

BRM/SMARCA2-negative clear cell renal cell carcinoma is associated with a high percentage of BRM somatic mutations, deletions and promoter methylation.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate potential molecular mechanisms associated with loss of BRM expression in poorly differentiated clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen previously selected BRM-negative RCC tissues were examined by DNA sequencing, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the BRM gene. BRM mutation was identified in 78.9% (15 of 19) cases, chromosome 9 monosomy or BRM deletion in 43.8% (seven of 16) and BRM promoter region cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) methylation in 42.8% (six of 14). These results indicated that 89.5% (17 of 19) of the cases harboured at least one type of BRM genetic alteration, with two or more types of alteration in 47.4% (nine of 19). Such alterations were found rarely in adjacent non-neoplastic tissues and low-grade areas of composite tumours. CONCLUSIONS: BRM gene mutation, chromosome 9 monosomy or BRM deletion and CpG methylation contribute collectively to the loss of BRM expression in ccRCC. This work focusing on composite tumours indicated that BRM abnormality occurred during tumour progression.

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma with NONO-TFE3 gene fusion: morphology, prognosis, and potential pitfall in detecting TFE3 gene rearrangement.

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas are characterized by several different translocations involving the TFE3 gene. Tumors with different specific gene fusions may have different clinicopathological manifestations. Fewer than 10 renal cell carcinoma cases with NONO-TFE3 have been described. Here we examined eight additional cases of this rare tumor using clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses. The male-to-female ratio of our study cohort was 1:1, and the median age was 30 years. The most distinctive feature of the tumors was that they exhibited glandular/tubular or papillary architecture that was lined with small-to-medium cuboidal to high columnar cells with indistinct cell borders and an abundantly clear or flocculent eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei were oriented toward the luminal surface and were round and uniform in shape, which resulted in the appearance of secretory endometrioid subnuclear vacuolization. The distinct glandular/tubular or papillary architecture was often accompanied by sheets of epithelial cells that presented a biphasic pattern. Immunohistochemically, all eight cases demonstrated moderate (2+) or strong (3+) positive staining for TFE3, CD10, RCC marker, and PAX-8. None of the tumors were immunoreactive for CK7, Cathepsin K, Melan-A, HMB45, Ksp-cadherin, Vimentin, CA9, 34ßE12 or CD117. NONO-TFE3 fusion transcripts were identified in six cases by RT-PCR. All eight cases showed equivocal split signals with a distance of nearly 2 signal diameters and sometimes had false-negative results. Furthermore, we developed a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to serve as an adjunct diagnostic tool for the detection of the NONO-TFE3 fusion gene and used this method to detect the fusion gene in all eight cases. Long-term follow-up (range, 10-102 months) was available for 7 patients. All 7 patients were alive with no evidence of recurrent disease or disease progression after their initial resection. This report adds to the known data regarding NONO-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma.

P16 overexpression in BRAF-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to analyze the histopathology, immunophenotype, molecular features, and prognosis in cases of BRAF-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to examine the p16 expression in these tumors, and further discuss its effects on tumor formation and progression. METHODS: In all, 283 GIST cases (201 KIT mutants, 12 PDGFRA mutants and 70 wild-type) from the 2010 to 2014 surgical pathology files of the Department of Pathology at Nanjing Jinling Hospital were analyzed for mutations in BRAF exon 15. Patient follow-up and clinical data were collected if available in the medical records. To determine the clinicopathological features and potential molecular mechanism, the authors examined 10 BRAF-mutated GIST cases for KIT, DOG1, SMA, desmin, S-100, Ki-67 and p16 expression. RESULTS: The authors identified 10 cases (3.5%) of BRAF (V600E) mutations in a series of 283 primary GISTs, without KIT (exons 9, 11, 13, 17) or PDGFRA (exons 12, 18) gene mutations. All 10 cases exhibited spindle-cell features, and the morphology and immunophenotype of these cases were no different from those in cases of KIT-mutated GISTs. The clinical results indicated that BRAF-mutated GISTs tended to occur more frequently in females (7/10), older individuals (mean age, 54.9 years) and the stomach (7/10), and that these tumors were low risk and exhibited low recurrence and mortality rates. Two different forms of p16 were identified, which presented with simultaneously strong and diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic expression patterns. CONCLUSION: GISTs with the BRAF V600E mutation are relatively benign tumors with a distinctive molecular mechanism. The expression of the nuclear and cytoplasmic forms of p16 represent two independent mechanisms, and both seemed to control proliferation in response to oncogenic stimuli, protecting the cell from malignant transformation in BRAF-mutated GISTs.

Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation of the prostate harbouring the novel NONO-TFE3 gene fusion: report of a unique case expanding the gene fusion spectrum.

Recently, an increasing number of TFE3 rearrangement-associated tumours have been reported, such as TFE3 rearrangement-associated perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas), melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers and melanotic Xp11 neoplasms. We have suggested that these tumours belong to a single clinicopathological spectrum. 'Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation' or 'melanotic Xp11 neoplasm' have been proposed to designate this unique neoplasm. Herein, we describe the first case of an Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation to be described in the prostate, bearing the novel NONO-TFE3 gene fusion. This study both adds to the spectrum regarding melanotic Xp11 neoplasms and expands its gene fusion spectrum. Moreover, we discuss the relationship of these rare tumours to neoplasms such as conventional PEComas, alveolar soft part sarcomas, malignant melanomas, clear cell sarcomas and Xp11 translocation renal cancers.

DCN deficiency promotes renal cell carcinoma growth and metastasis through downregulation of P21 and E-cadherin.

Decorin (DCN), as an important component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), is a small leucine-rich proteoglycan and synthesized by fibroblasts. Although DCN is dysregulated in numerous cancer types, limited data are available on the expression level and important role of DCN proteins in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In our study, we examined the expression patterns of DCN messenger RNA (mRNA) in RCCs through the Oncomine database and DCN protein in 94 RCC specimens by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The results revealed that DCN expression was decreased in cancerous tissues compared to adjacent noncancerous tissues and was highly correlated to tumor size. Then, via gain-of-function analyses, DCN overexpression could inhibit RCC cell proliferation and metastasis in vitro and vivo. At the mechanism level, we found that an ectopic expression of DCN significantly upregulated P21 and E-cadherin expression. Altogether, these results revealed that DCN is a tumor suppressor in RCC, and it could serve as a potential therapeutic target in patients with RCC.

[Clinicopathologic study of primary renal hemangioblastoma].

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinicopathologic characteristics of primary renal hemangioblastoma. METHODS: The morphologic features, immunophenotype and molecular findings of 3 cases of primary renal hemangioblastoma were studied, with review of literature. RESULTS: The age of patients ranged from 43 to 57 years. There were 2 women and a man. The patients often presented with renal mass. Histologically, the tumors were surrounded by thick fibrous capsule and composed of epithelioid or spindle cells. Two cases had a prominent stromal component and the other one was rich in capillary network. Lipid vacuoles were observed in all cases. Features of hemorrhage were demonstrated in 2 cases. Capsular invasion and necrosis were seen in 1 case. Immunohistochemical study showed that the stromal cells were positive for alpha-inhibin (3/3), S-100 protein (3/3), EGFR (2/2), PAX-2 (2/2), PAX-8 (2/2) and CA9 (2/2) but negative for CKpan (2/2) and HMB45 (2/2). Focal membranous staining for CD10 (3/3) was noted. No VHL gene mutations or chromosome 3p deletion were detected in the 2 cases studied. CONCLUSIONS: Renal hemangioblastoma shows distinctive morphologic appearance with a wide range of variation. The unexpected positive staining for PAX-2, PAX-8 and CD10 in renal hemangioblastoma needs to be aware. Immunohistochemical study may be helpful in differential diagnosis of these renal tumors.

PSF/SFPQ is a very common gene fusion partner in TFE3 rearrangement-associated perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) and melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics suggesting classification as a distinct entity.

An increasing number of TFE3 rearrangement-associated tumors, such as TFE3 rearrangement-associated perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas), melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers, and melanotic Xp11 neoplasms, have recently been reported. We examined 12 such cases, including 5 TFE3 rearrangement-associated PEComas located in the pancreas, cervix, or pelvis and 7 melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers, using clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses. All the tumors shared a similar morphology, including a purely nested or sheet-like architecture separated by a delicate vascular network, purely epithelioid cells displaying a clear or granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, a lack of papillary structures and spindle cell or fat components, uniform round or oval nuclei containing small visible nucleoli, and, in most cases (11/12), melanin pigmentation. The levels of mitotic activity and necrosis varied. All 12 cases displayed moderately (2+) or strongly (3+) positive immunoreactivity for TFE3 and cathepsin K. One case labeled focally for HMB45 and Melan-A, whereas the others typically labeled moderately (2+) or strongly (3+) for 1 of these markers. None of the cases were immunoreactive for smooth muscle actin, desmin, CKpan, S100, or PAX8. PSF-TFE3 fusion genes were confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in cases (7/7) in which a novel PSF-TFE3 fusion point was identified. All of the cases displayed TFE3 rearrangement associated with Xp11 translocation. Furthermore, we developed a PSF-TFE3 fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of the PSF-TFE3 fusion gene and detected it in all 12 cases. Clinical follow-up data were available for 7 patients. Three patients died, and 2 patients (cases 1 and 3) remained alive with no evidence of disease after initial resection. Case 2 experienced recurrence and remained alive with disease. Case 5, a recent case, remained alive with extensive abdominal cavity metastases. Our data suggest that these tumors belong to a single clinicopathologic spectrum and expand the known characteristics of TFE3 rearrangement-associated tumors.

TMED6-COG8 is a novel molecular marker of TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma.

TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinoma is a highly aggressive malignancy which often occurs primarily in children and young adults. The pathognomonic molecular lesion in this subtype is a translocation event involving the TFE3 transcription factor at chromosome Xp11.2. Hence, the pathological diagnosis of an Xp11.2 translocation RCC is based upon morphology, TFE3 immunohistochemistry, or genetic analyses. However, due to the false-positive immunoreactivity for TFE3 IHC and expensive for TFE3 break-apart FISH assay, additional molecular markers are necessary to help provide early diagnose and individualization treatment. Owing to recent advances in microarray and RNA-Seq, Pflueger et al. have discovered that TMED6-COG8 is dramatically increased in TFE3 translocation RCCs, compared with clear cell RCCs and papillary RCCs, implying that TMED6-COG8 might be a new molecular tumor marker of TFE3 translocation RCCs. To extend this observation, we firstly validated the TMED6-COG8 expression level by qRT-PCR in RCCs including Xp11.2 translocation RCCs (n=5), clear cell RCCs (n=7) and papillary RCCs (n=5). Then, we also examined the expression level of TMED6-COG8 chimera in Xp11.2 translocation alveolar soft part sarcoma. We found that TMED6-COG8 chimera expression level was higher in Xp11.2 translocation RCCs than in ASPS (P<0.05). What's more, the expression levels of TMED6-COG8 chimera in esophagus cancers (n=32), gastric cancers (n=11), colorectal cancers (n=12), hepatocellular carcinomas (n=10) and non-small-cell lung cancers (n=12) were assessed. Unexpectedly, TMED6-COG8 chimera was decreased in these five human types. Therefore, our observations from this study indicated that TMED6-COG8 chimera might act as a novel diagnostic marker in Xp11.2 translocation RCCs.